Effect of triple inhaled therapy on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared with dual inhaled therapy in COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.9 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
A. Calderón-Montero , M. García Fernández , M.E. García-Velasco , M. Joshi , K. Khan , C. Calderón-Ferrer , M. Núñez-Núñez
{"title":"Effect of triple inhaled therapy on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared with dual inhaled therapy in COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"A. Calderón-Montero ,&nbsp;M. García Fernández ,&nbsp;M.E. García-Velasco ,&nbsp;M. Joshi ,&nbsp;K. Khan ,&nbsp;C. Calderón-Ferrer ,&nbsp;M. Núñez-Núñez","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2025.102478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is uncertainty about the role of triple inhaled therapy with LAMA/LABA/ICS (long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist/inhaled glucocorticoids) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on cardiovascular mortality. We estimated the effect of triple inhaled therapy (TT) compared with dual inhaled therapy (DT, including either LAMA/LABA or LABA/ICS) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in an evidence synthesis,</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following prospective registration (<span><span>https://osf.io/gtfvm</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), a comprehensive search strategy of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was performed, without language or time restrictions until September 30, 2024. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating TT vs. DT and reporting cardiovascular or all-cause mortality were included. We assessed risk of bias and conducted a random effect meta-analysis estimating summary relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), evaluating heterogeneity using <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was undertaken to hierarchically rank the therapies using P-score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 781 citations, 5 RCTs were selected. There were 3 three-arm RCTs comparing TT vs. LABA/ICS vs. LAMA/LABA, 1 two-arm RCT comparing TT vs. LABA/ICS, and 1 two-arm RCT comparing TT vs. LAMA/LABA (total of 7855 patients receiving TT, 7003 LABA/ICS and 5059 LAMA/LABA). The risk of bias was moderate in 2 (40%), and low in 3 (60%) RCTs. TT reduced cardiovascular mortality by 48% vs. LAMA/LABA (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32–0.86, 3 RCTs, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0%) and by a non-significant 11% vs. LABA/ICS (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.57–1.37, 3 RCTs, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0%). TT reduced all-cause mortality by 34% vs. LAMA/LABA (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.90, 4 RCTs, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->23.7%) and by 10% vs. LABA/ICS (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71–1.13, 4 RCTs, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0%). For both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, NMA P-score showed that TT ranked first (81%/91%), LABA/ICS ranked second (58%/57%) and LAMA/LABA ranked last (11%/&lt;1%) in effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with moderate to very severe COPD and previous exacerbations, TT inhaled significantly reduces cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared to LAMA/LABA dual therapy, but not when compared to LABA/ICS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53212,"journal":{"name":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 102478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359325000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is uncertainty about the role of triple inhaled therapy with LAMA/LABA/ICS (long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist/inhaled glucocorticoids) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on cardiovascular mortality. We estimated the effect of triple inhaled therapy (TT) compared with dual inhaled therapy (DT, including either LAMA/LABA or LABA/ICS) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in an evidence synthesis,

Methods

Following prospective registration (https://osf.io/gtfvm), a comprehensive search strategy of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was performed, without language or time restrictions until September 30, 2024. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating TT vs. DT and reporting cardiovascular or all-cause mortality were included. We assessed risk of bias and conducted a random effect meta-analysis estimating summary relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), evaluating heterogeneity using I2. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was undertaken to hierarchically rank the therapies using P-score.

Results

From 781 citations, 5 RCTs were selected. There were 3 three-arm RCTs comparing TT vs. LABA/ICS vs. LAMA/LABA, 1 two-arm RCT comparing TT vs. LABA/ICS, and 1 two-arm RCT comparing TT vs. LAMA/LABA (total of 7855 patients receiving TT, 7003 LABA/ICS and 5059 LAMA/LABA). The risk of bias was moderate in 2 (40%), and low in 3 (60%) RCTs. TT reduced cardiovascular mortality by 48% vs. LAMA/LABA (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32–0.86, 3 RCTs, I2 = 0%) and by a non-significant 11% vs. LABA/ICS (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.57–1.37, 3 RCTs, I2 = 0%). TT reduced all-cause mortality by 34% vs. LAMA/LABA (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.90, 4 RCTs, I2 = 23.7%) and by 10% vs. LABA/ICS (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71–1.13, 4 RCTs, I2 = 0%). For both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, NMA P-score showed that TT ranked first (81%/91%), LABA/ICS ranked second (58%/57%) and LAMA/LABA ranked last (11%/<1%) in effectiveness.

Conclusions

In patients with moderate to very severe COPD and previous exacerbations, TT inhaled significantly reduces cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared to LAMA/LABA dual therapy, but not when compared to LABA/ICS.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
39 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信