Comparison of windblown sand environmental effects between railway embankment and bridge and its engineering significance

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
ShengBo Xie , Xiang Wan , Xian Zhang , QingJie Han , YingJun Pang
{"title":"Comparison of windblown sand environmental effects between railway embankment and bridge and its engineering significance","authors":"ShengBo Xie ,&nbsp;Xiang Wan ,&nbsp;Xian Zhang ,&nbsp;QingJie Han ,&nbsp;YingJun Pang","doi":"10.1016/j.rcar.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The embankment and bridge are the basic forms of railway lines. To date, no reports have addressed the optimal form to adopt when passing through sandy areas. Therefore, models of railway embankment and bridge were created, and wind tunnel experiments were conducted to compare the differences in wind speed, flow field, sand transport rate, and other wind–sand environmental effects of railway embankment and bridge. Results show that wind speed reduction areas in the upwind and downwind directions were observed for the railway embankment and bridge. In these areas, the extent and degree of wind speed reduction on the embankment were greater than those on the bridge. At the top of the embankment, especially on the windward slope shoulder, an obvious area of wind speed increase was observed. Similarly, a distinct area of wind speed increase was found between the top of the windward side slope shoulder and 3H downwind of the bridge. Within these regions, the range of wind speed increase on the embankment was smaller than that on the bridge, but the degree of increase was greater than that on the bridge. The range of variation in wind speed on the embankment was generally greater than that on the bridge. The wind–sand flow field around the embankment exhibited greater variability than that around the bridge. Moreover, higher wind–sand flow passage rates on the embankment than on the bridge. This study aims to offer recommendations to assist in the route selection, surveying, and design of railways in sandy regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53163,"journal":{"name":"Research in Cold and Arid Regions","volume":"17 1","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Cold and Arid Regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097158324000818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The embankment and bridge are the basic forms of railway lines. To date, no reports have addressed the optimal form to adopt when passing through sandy areas. Therefore, models of railway embankment and bridge were created, and wind tunnel experiments were conducted to compare the differences in wind speed, flow field, sand transport rate, and other wind–sand environmental effects of railway embankment and bridge. Results show that wind speed reduction areas in the upwind and downwind directions were observed for the railway embankment and bridge. In these areas, the extent and degree of wind speed reduction on the embankment were greater than those on the bridge. At the top of the embankment, especially on the windward slope shoulder, an obvious area of wind speed increase was observed. Similarly, a distinct area of wind speed increase was found between the top of the windward side slope shoulder and 3H downwind of the bridge. Within these regions, the range of wind speed increase on the embankment was smaller than that on the bridge, but the degree of increase was greater than that on the bridge. The range of variation in wind speed on the embankment was generally greater than that on the bridge. The wind–sand flow field around the embankment exhibited greater variability than that around the bridge. Moreover, higher wind–sand flow passage rates on the embankment than on the bridge. This study aims to offer recommendations to assist in the route selection, surveying, and design of railways in sandy regions.
铁路路堤与桥梁的风吹砂环境效应比较及其工程意义
路堤和桥梁是铁路线路的基本形式。到目前为止,还没有报告涉及通过沙质地区时采用的最佳形式。为此,建立铁路路堤和桥梁模型,进行风洞试验,比较铁路路堤和桥梁的风速、流场、输沙率等风沙环境效应的差异。结果表明:铁路路堤和桥梁在顺风方向和顺风方向上均存在减速区;在这些地区,路堤上的风速减小幅度和程度大于桥梁上的风速减小幅度和程度。在路堤顶部,特别是迎风坡肩处,风速增加区域明显。同样,在迎风坡肩顶至桥梁下风3H处风速增大区域明显。在这些区域内,路堤风速的增加幅度小于桥梁,但风速的增加程度大于桥梁。路堤上的风速变化幅度一般大于桥上的风速变化幅度。路堤周围的风沙流场变异性明显大于桥梁周围。此外,路堤上的风沙流通过率高于桥上的风沙流通过率。本研究旨在为沙质地区铁路的选线、勘测和设计提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信