AI-guided precision parenteral nutrition for neonatal intensive care units

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Thanaphong Phongpreecha, Marc Ghanem, Jonathan D. Reiss, Tomiko Oskotsky, Samson J. Mataraso, Davide De Francesco, S. Momsen Reincke, Camilo Espinosa, Philip Chung, Taryn Ng, Jean M. Costello, Jennifer A. Sequoia, Sheila Razdan, Feng Xie, Eloise Berson, Yeasul Kim, David Seong, May Y. Szeto, Faith Myers, Hannah Gu, John Feister, Courtney P. Verscaj, Laura A. Rose, Lucas W. Y. Sin, Boris Oskotsky, Jacquelyn Roger, Chi-hung Shu, Sayane Shome, Liu K. Yang, Yuqi Tan, Steven Levitte, Ronald J. Wong, Brice Gaudillière, Martin S. Angst, Thomas J. Montine, John A. Kerner, Roberta L. Keller, Gary M. Shaw, Karl G. Sylvester, Janene Fuerch, Valerie Chock, Shabnam Gaskari, David K. Stevenson, Marina Sirota, Lawrence S. Prince, Nima Aghaeepour
{"title":"AI-guided precision parenteral nutrition for neonatal intensive care units","authors":"Thanaphong Phongpreecha, Marc Ghanem, Jonathan D. Reiss, Tomiko Oskotsky, Samson J. Mataraso, Davide De Francesco, S. Momsen Reincke, Camilo Espinosa, Philip Chung, Taryn Ng, Jean M. Costello, Jennifer A. Sequoia, Sheila Razdan, Feng Xie, Eloise Berson, Yeasul Kim, David Seong, May Y. Szeto, Faith Myers, Hannah Gu, John Feister, Courtney P. Verscaj, Laura A. Rose, Lucas W. Y. Sin, Boris Oskotsky, Jacquelyn Roger, Chi-hung Shu, Sayane Shome, Liu K. Yang, Yuqi Tan, Steven Levitte, Ronald J. Wong, Brice Gaudillière, Martin S. Angst, Thomas J. Montine, John A. Kerner, Roberta L. Keller, Gary M. Shaw, Karl G. Sylvester, Janene Fuerch, Valerie Chock, Shabnam Gaskari, David K. Stevenson, Marina Sirota, Lawrence S. Prince, Nima Aghaeepour","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03601-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One in ten neonates are admitted to neonatal intensive care units, highlighting the need for precise interventions. However, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in guiding neonatal care remains underexplored. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a life-saving treatment for preterm neonates; however, implementation of the therapy in its current form is subjective, error-prone and resource-consuming. Here, we developed TPN2.0—a data-driven approach that optimizes and standardizes TPN using information collected routinely in electronic health records. We assembled a decade of TPN compositions (79,790 orders; 5,913 patients) at Stanford to train TPN2.0. In addition to internal validation, we also validated our model in an external cohort (63,273 orders; 3,417 patients) from a second hospital. Our algorithm identified 15 TPN formulas that can enable a precision-medicine approach (Pearson’s <i>R</i> = 0.94 compared to experts), increasing safety and potentially reducing cost. A blinded study (<i>n</i> = 192) revealed that physicians rated TPN2.0 higher than current best practice. In patients with high disagreement between the actual prescriptions and TPN2.0, standard prescriptions were associated with increased morbidities (for example, odds ratio = 3.33; <i>P</i> value = 0.0007 for necrotizing enterocolitis), while TPN2.0 recommendations were linked to reduced risk. Finally, we demonstrated that TPN2.0 employing a transformer architecture enabled guideline-adhering, physician-in-the-loop recommendations that allow collaboration between the care team and AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03601-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One in ten neonates are admitted to neonatal intensive care units, highlighting the need for precise interventions. However, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in guiding neonatal care remains underexplored. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a life-saving treatment for preterm neonates; however, implementation of the therapy in its current form is subjective, error-prone and resource-consuming. Here, we developed TPN2.0—a data-driven approach that optimizes and standardizes TPN using information collected routinely in electronic health records. We assembled a decade of TPN compositions (79,790 orders; 5,913 patients) at Stanford to train TPN2.0. In addition to internal validation, we also validated our model in an external cohort (63,273 orders; 3,417 patients) from a second hospital. Our algorithm identified 15 TPN formulas that can enable a precision-medicine approach (Pearson’s R = 0.94 compared to experts), increasing safety and potentially reducing cost. A blinded study (n = 192) revealed that physicians rated TPN2.0 higher than current best practice. In patients with high disagreement between the actual prescriptions and TPN2.0, standard prescriptions were associated with increased morbidities (for example, odds ratio = 3.33; P value = 0.0007 for necrotizing enterocolitis), while TPN2.0 recommendations were linked to reduced risk. Finally, we demonstrated that TPN2.0 employing a transformer architecture enabled guideline-adhering, physician-in-the-loop recommendations that allow collaboration between the care team and AI.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信