{"title":"Middle School Students' Experiences with Place-Based STEM Outreach","authors":"Tugba Boz, Nora Smith, Rebekah Hammack, Hilarie Davis, Jamie Cornish","doi":"10.1007/s11165-025-10245-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A five-day workshop, rooted in place-based approaches, was offered to 24 underserved/underrepresented middle school students. The workshop's activities centered around three key concepts of disease ecology: 1) the interactions between living things and their environment, 2) the impact of environmental interactions on health, and 3) the role of scientists and students in improving health. Throughout the week, students reflected on the disease ecology concepts in relation to their own lives and communities after each session. Daily reflections and student interviews were used to explore students' successes and challenges with the activities, as well as the relevance of place-based learning for their understanding of these three disease ecology concepts. The analysis revealed that the workshop was influential not just in teaching disease ecology to middle school students but also in fostering a deeper interest in science through hands-on learning and place-based activities. The connection to their places made the learning more relevant and interesting for students. The student reflections on each of the disease ecology questions showed that while students faced challenges in connecting disease ecology concepts to personal and community health practices, the overall trend indicated a positive trajectory in students' understanding and application of disease ecology topics. We conclude that the workshop demonstrated the effectiveness of combining place-based pedagogies in engaging underserved middle school students in disease ecology and its real-world implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10245-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A five-day workshop, rooted in place-based approaches, was offered to 24 underserved/underrepresented middle school students. The workshop's activities centered around three key concepts of disease ecology: 1) the interactions between living things and their environment, 2) the impact of environmental interactions on health, and 3) the role of scientists and students in improving health. Throughout the week, students reflected on the disease ecology concepts in relation to their own lives and communities after each session. Daily reflections and student interviews were used to explore students' successes and challenges with the activities, as well as the relevance of place-based learning for their understanding of these three disease ecology concepts. The analysis revealed that the workshop was influential not just in teaching disease ecology to middle school students but also in fostering a deeper interest in science through hands-on learning and place-based activities. The connection to their places made the learning more relevant and interesting for students. The student reflections on each of the disease ecology questions showed that while students faced challenges in connecting disease ecology concepts to personal and community health practices, the overall trend indicated a positive trajectory in students' understanding and application of disease ecology topics. We conclude that the workshop demonstrated the effectiveness of combining place-based pedagogies in engaging underserved middle school students in disease ecology and its real-world implications.
期刊介绍:
2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021
2020 Impact Factor: 5.439
Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus
2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus
Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership.
RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal.
You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research:
Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and
Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know.
RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted.
The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers.
Empircal contributions are:
Theoretically or conceptually grounded;
Relevant to science education theory and practice;
Highlight limitations of the study; and
Identify possible future research opportunities.
From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks.
Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is:
No longer than 6000 words, including references.
Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability;
Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education;
Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and
Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE.
While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.