Christian Krohn , Leadin Khudur , Sali Khair Biek , Jake AK Elliott , Seyedali Tabatabaei , Chenjing Jiang , Jennifer L. Wood , Daniel Anthony Dias , Morten K.D. Dueholm , Catherine A. Rees , Denis O'Carroll , Richard Stuetz , Damien J. Batstone , Aravind Surapaneni , Andrew S. Ball
{"title":"Microbial population shifts during disturbance induced foaming in anaerobic digestion of primary and activated sludge","authors":"Christian Krohn , Leadin Khudur , Sali Khair Biek , Jake AK Elliott , Seyedali Tabatabaei , Chenjing Jiang , Jennifer L. Wood , Daniel Anthony Dias , Morten K.D. Dueholm , Catherine A. Rees , Denis O'Carroll , Richard Stuetz , Damien J. Batstone , Aravind Surapaneni , Andrew S. Ball","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Foaming during anaerobic digestion (AD) of sewage sludge is poorly understood and remains an uncontrollable operational obstacle for sewage treatment systems globally, causing mechanical damage, increased hazards and reduced biogas recovery. Foams during AD commonly occur after process disturbances, such as organic loading shocks. However, it is still unclear whether these foam events are biologically driven and linked to the abundance of organisms like filamentous or hydrophobic bacteria. A time-series study was conducted, comparing digestion performance, microbial community succession, metagenomes, and metabolomes in six anaerobic continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs): a control group fed normally (<em>n</em> = 3), and one treated group inhibited through organic shock loading of more than twice the steady state loading rate with glycerol (treatment, <em>n</em> = 3). As soon as microbial activity and methanogenesis recovered after inhibition, significant volumes of foam accumulated simultaneously in the reactor headspace of the three treated CSTRs. Microbial abundance profiles (16S rRNA, V3-V4) from 165 days of operation showed that filamentous or mycolic acid-producing organisms were not associated with this foam event. Shock loading led to acidification, biomass decline and microbial imbalance, contributing indirectly to the foam event. During that period, metabolomes and functional pathway abundances indicated that the stressed microbial biomass was enriched in long-chain fatty acids prior to foaming. This biomass, combined with pH changes, may have modified the physicochemical properties of sludge, leading to the fractionation of organic mass once gas production resumed. More research is needed to understand how abiotic and biotic interactions contribute to foam formation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"281 ","pages":"Article 123548"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425004610","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Foaming during anaerobic digestion (AD) of sewage sludge is poorly understood and remains an uncontrollable operational obstacle for sewage treatment systems globally, causing mechanical damage, increased hazards and reduced biogas recovery. Foams during AD commonly occur after process disturbances, such as organic loading shocks. However, it is still unclear whether these foam events are biologically driven and linked to the abundance of organisms like filamentous or hydrophobic bacteria. A time-series study was conducted, comparing digestion performance, microbial community succession, metagenomes, and metabolomes in six anaerobic continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs): a control group fed normally (n = 3), and one treated group inhibited through organic shock loading of more than twice the steady state loading rate with glycerol (treatment, n = 3). As soon as microbial activity and methanogenesis recovered after inhibition, significant volumes of foam accumulated simultaneously in the reactor headspace of the three treated CSTRs. Microbial abundance profiles (16S rRNA, V3-V4) from 165 days of operation showed that filamentous or mycolic acid-producing organisms were not associated with this foam event. Shock loading led to acidification, biomass decline and microbial imbalance, contributing indirectly to the foam event. During that period, metabolomes and functional pathway abundances indicated that the stressed microbial biomass was enriched in long-chain fatty acids prior to foaming. This biomass, combined with pH changes, may have modified the physicochemical properties of sludge, leading to the fractionation of organic mass once gas production resumed. More research is needed to understand how abiotic and biotic interactions contribute to foam formation.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.