Critical field evaluations of biochar-amended stormwater biofilters for PFAS and other organic micropollutant removals

IF 11.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ali Beryani, Kelsey Flanagan, Shujie You, Fredrik Forsberg, Maria Viklander, Godecke-Tobias Blecken
{"title":"Critical field evaluations of biochar-amended stormwater biofilters for PFAS and other organic micropollutant removals","authors":"Ali Beryani, Kelsey Flanagan, Shujie You, Fredrik Forsberg, Maria Viklander, Godecke-Tobias Blecken","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biochar is often promoted as an ideal amendment for stormwater biofilters; however, its effectiveness has rarely been tested under field conditions. This study evaluates the impact of biochar addition on the removal of organic micropollutants (OMPs) in field-scale biofilters operating under real-world conditions for the first time. The research comprised four vegetated biofilter facilities (3−5 years old), two without and two with 2.1 <em>wt.</em>% (10 <em>vol.</em>%) biochar amendment. Stormwater and filter material samples from various locations after four years of operation were analyzed for a wide range of common and emerging OMPs found in urban runoff. Unlike hydrophobic OMPs (hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate), the investigated biofilters demonstrated low, or inconsistent, removal of hydrophilic and slow-adsorbing OMPs like bisphenol A, monobutyltin, and per-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Although the physiochemical properties of biochar were well-adapted to pollutant removal, biochar amendment did not significantly improve OMP removal when compared with the status quo. This can be attributed to several field conditions and suboptimal design interfering with the biochar's sorption capacity, namely, the large particle size (D<sub>50</sub> ∼4 mm) and low quantity of biochar, high levels of competing agents (i.e., dissolved oxygen carbon (DOC) and cations), co-contaminants in stormwater, limited contact time, biochar pore blockage (e.g., by DOC molecules and sediments/minerals), diminished biochar surface porosity, and sometimes increased removal uncertainty due to low influent concentrations. Our findings demonstrated the complexities associated with applying biochar for stormwater treatment. Further research on biochar-specific biofilter designs is needed to optimize the sorption potential of this material under field conditions.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123547","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biochar is often promoted as an ideal amendment for stormwater biofilters; however, its effectiveness has rarely been tested under field conditions. This study evaluates the impact of biochar addition on the removal of organic micropollutants (OMPs) in field-scale biofilters operating under real-world conditions for the first time. The research comprised four vegetated biofilter facilities (3−5 years old), two without and two with 2.1 wt.% (10 vol.%) biochar amendment. Stormwater and filter material samples from various locations after four years of operation were analyzed for a wide range of common and emerging OMPs found in urban runoff. Unlike hydrophobic OMPs (hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate), the investigated biofilters demonstrated low, or inconsistent, removal of hydrophilic and slow-adsorbing OMPs like bisphenol A, monobutyltin, and per-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Although the physiochemical properties of biochar were well-adapted to pollutant removal, biochar amendment did not significantly improve OMP removal when compared with the status quo. This can be attributed to several field conditions and suboptimal design interfering with the biochar's sorption capacity, namely, the large particle size (D50 ∼4 mm) and low quantity of biochar, high levels of competing agents (i.e., dissolved oxygen carbon (DOC) and cations), co-contaminants in stormwater, limited contact time, biochar pore blockage (e.g., by DOC molecules and sediments/minerals), diminished biochar surface porosity, and sometimes increased removal uncertainty due to low influent concentrations. Our findings demonstrated the complexities associated with applying biochar for stormwater treatment. Further research on biochar-specific biofilter designs is needed to optimize the sorption potential of this material under field conditions.

Abstract Image

生物炭通常被宣传为雨水生物滤池的理想添加剂,但其有效性很少在现场条件下进行测试。本研究首次评估了添加生物炭对在实际条件下运行的实地生物滤池去除有机微污染物(OMPs)的影响。研究包括四个植被生物滤池设施(3-5 年),其中两个未添加生物炭,另两个添加了 2.1 wt.%(10 vol.%)的生物炭。对运行四年后来自不同地点的雨水和过滤材料样本进行了分析,以检测城市径流中常见和新出现的各种 OMP。与疏水性 OMPs(碳氢化合物、多氯联苯和邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己酯))不同,所调查的生物过滤器对亲水性和慢吸附性 OMPs(如双酚 A、单丁基锡和全氟烷基物质)的去除率较低或不一致。虽然生物炭的理化特性非常适合去除污染物,但与现状相比,生物炭添加剂并没有显著提高对 OMP 的去除率。这可能是由于一些现场条件和次优设计干扰了生物炭的吸附能力,即生物炭的粒径大(D50 ∼ 4 毫米)、数量少、竞争介质(即溶解氧碳(DOC))含量高、生物炭的物理化学特性(D50 ∼ 4 毫米)和生物炭的化学性能(D50 ∼ 4 毫米)均影响了生物炭的吸附能力、例如,溶解氧碳 (DOC) 和阳离子)、雨水中的共污染物、有限的接触时间、生物炭孔隙阻塞(如 DOC 分子和沉积物/矿物质)、生物炭表面孔隙率降低,以及有时因进水浓度低而增加的去除不确定性。我们的研究结果表明了将生物炭用于雨水处理的复杂性。需要进一步研究生物炭特定的生物滤池设计,以优化这种材料在现场条件下的吸附潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Research
Water Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1307
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include: •Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management; •Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure; •Drinking water treatment and distribution; •Potable and non-potable water reuse; •Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment; •Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions; •Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment; •Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution; •Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation; •Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts; •Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle; •Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信