Organically managed Sanqi alters the soil C metabolism and purine metabolism pathway through metagenomic and metabolomic analyses

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Shu He, Rui Rui, Jingying Hei, Yue Li, Noor Faisal, Biao Wang, Xiahong He, Shu Wang
{"title":"Organically managed Sanqi alters the soil C metabolism and purine metabolism pathway through metagenomic and metabolomic analyses","authors":"Shu He, Rui Rui, Jingying Hei, Yue Li, Noor Faisal, Biao Wang, Xiahong He, Shu Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07396-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p><i>Panax notoginseng</i> (Sanqi), organically cultivated in the forest understory, has been shown to enhance its quality. However, the impact of organically vs. conventionally managed Sanqi on soil community composition, function, and metabolites remains unclear.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Here, we compared various land use patterns, including monoculture pine (MP), organically managed Sanqi (OMS), and conventionally managed Sanqi (CMS), to explore the diversity, function, and metabolism of the soil microbiome using metagenomic and metabolomic techniques.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Our findings revealed that OMS and MP exhibited similar microbial α-diversity, community structure, and function as opposed to CMS. Moreover, both the OMS and CMS demonstrated a higher level of microbial complexity and stability than the MP, with respective enhancements ranging from 1.106% to 1.359% and 1.037% to 1.113%. Acidobacteria and <i>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</i> were significantly enriched in OMS but not in CMS. The OMS soils exhibited a notable enhancement in the carbon fixation pathway. In addition, differential metabolites such as deoxynucleosine, hypoxanthine, deoxyadenosine, deoxyguanosine, inosine, and guanine were found in the highest content in the OMS soils, primarily enriched in the purine metabolism pathway of nucleotide metabolism (map01232). OMS exhibited two additional factors (microbial α-diversity and community structure) directly influencing soil metabolites compared with CMS.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>OMS significantly enhances microbial complexity and stability and the accumulation of beneficial metabolites. As a result, the land use conversion from MP to OMS fosters the development of a more stable and healthier soil environment, thereby providing a robust ecological foundation for the growth of Sanqi.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07396-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Panax notoginseng (Sanqi), organically cultivated in the forest understory, has been shown to enhance its quality. However, the impact of organically vs. conventionally managed Sanqi on soil community composition, function, and metabolites remains unclear.

Methods

Here, we compared various land use patterns, including monoculture pine (MP), organically managed Sanqi (OMS), and conventionally managed Sanqi (CMS), to explore the diversity, function, and metabolism of the soil microbiome using metagenomic and metabolomic techniques.

Results

Our findings revealed that OMS and MP exhibited similar microbial α-diversity, community structure, and function as opposed to CMS. Moreover, both the OMS and CMS demonstrated a higher level of microbial complexity and stability than the MP, with respective enhancements ranging from 1.106% to 1.359% and 1.037% to 1.113%. Acidobacteria and Bradyrhizobium japonicum were significantly enriched in OMS but not in CMS. The OMS soils exhibited a notable enhancement in the carbon fixation pathway. In addition, differential metabolites such as deoxynucleosine, hypoxanthine, deoxyadenosine, deoxyguanosine, inosine, and guanine were found in the highest content in the OMS soils, primarily enriched in the purine metabolism pathway of nucleotide metabolism (map01232). OMS exhibited two additional factors (microbial α-diversity and community structure) directly influencing soil metabolites compared with CMS.

Conclusion

OMS significantly enhances microbial complexity and stability and the accumulation of beneficial metabolites. As a result, the land use conversion from MP to OMS fosters the development of a more stable and healthier soil environment, thereby providing a robust ecological foundation for the growth of Sanqi.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信