Mountains are not like poles for symbiotic and saprotrophic soil fungi

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1111/nph.70084
Peter G. Kennedy, Matthew E. Smith
{"title":"Mountains are not like poles for symbiotic and saprotrophic soil fungi","authors":"Peter G. Kennedy, Matthew E. Smith","doi":"10.1111/nph.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>Understanding how soil fungal communities respond to environmental gradients is crucial for predicting ecosystem functions in a changing climate (Baldrian <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). In a recent study published in <i>New Phytologist</i>, Barbi <i>et al</i>. (<span>2025</span>; doi: 10.1111/nph.70012) investigate how different fungal guilds – ectomycorrhizal (ECM), saprotrophic (SAP), and root endophytic (REND) fungi – are distributed across latitudinal and elevational gradients at 17 sites throughout Europe. This work provides a much-needed perspective on whether mountains function as ‘latitudinal analogs’ for soil fungal communities and how different fungal lifestyles mediate biogeographical patterns. Their findings both confirm and challenge our prevailing understanding, particularly regarding the universality of the mid-domain effect as an explanation for fungal elevational distributions. <blockquote><p><i>…the findings highlight the need to move beyond simplistic models that assume uniform responses across taxonomic or functional groups</i>.</p>\n<div></div>\n</blockquote>\n</div>\n<p>This study employs a standardized, continent-wide sampling protocol across sites spanning from Spain and Greece, in the south, to Iceland and Norway, in the north, ensuring robust cross-site comparability. By applying various statistical models, including joint species distribution models, the researchers capture both guild-level diversity patterns and species-specific responses to both elevational and latitudinal gradients, with a specific effort toward disentangling the impacts of climate relative to other ecological variables. This rigorous approach, combined with thorough bioinformatic analyses, meets all the important benchmarks for assessing fungal community structure at large spatial scales.</p>\n<p>All three fungal guilds displayed a significant trend in operational taxonomic unit (OTU) richness, but none were significant for both elevation and latitude (Fig. 1). This suggests that the responses to these two gradients are not direct analogs, despite sharing similar climatic and vegetational trends. SAP fungal richness significantly decreased with increasing elevation, while REND fungal richness significantly increased with increasing latitude. By contrast, ECM fungal richness displayed a nonlinear response, showing a significant positive unimodal relationship with elevation. Importantly, for all three guilds, there was no significant interaction between the effects of elevation and latitude on OTU richness. This finding contrasts with the idea that ‘mountain passes are higher in the tropics’ (Janzen, <span>1967</span>); that is, high elevations at low latitudes present more significant physiological barriers to organisms than similar elevations at higher latitudes. This result does not, however, mean that climate was not an important predictor of fungal OTU richness, as multiple climate-related variables were identified as significant explanatory variables of OTU richness in random forest models. Instead, this finding indicates that additional ecological variables beyond climate also strongly impact fungal guild spatial distributions.</p>\n<figure><picture>\n<source media=\"(min-width: 1650px)\" srcset=\"/cms/asset/cf8fe21d-74e6-4a18-b8f5-4cf454905edd/nph70084-fig-0001-m.jpg\"/><img alt=\"Details are in the caption following the image\" data-lg-src=\"/cms/asset/cf8fe21d-74e6-4a18-b8f5-4cf454905edd/nph70084-fig-0001-m.jpg\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"/cms/asset/35b2b2cb-d93f-4613-ad36-d13b9b418454/nph70084-fig-0001-m.png\" title=\"Details are in the caption following the image\"/></picture><figcaption>\n<div><strong>Fig. 1<span style=\"font-weight:normal\"></span></strong><div>Open in figure viewer<i aria-hidden=\"true\"></i><span>PowerPoint</span></div>\n</div>\n<div>Summary of species richness trends by soil fungal guild across latitude and elevation relative to trends typically observed for plants and animals.</div>\n</figcaption>\n</figure>\n<p>The range of richness patterns across guilds provides strong evidence that fungal species distributions are not the product of ‘null’ ecological processes. One well-cited explanation for a unimodal richness pattern across a bounded domain is the mid-domain effect (Colwell <i>et al</i>., <span>2000</span>), which posits that because of hard constraints at each end of the domain (i.e. a species cannot have any of its range outside the domain), more species' ranges will overlap toward the center of the domain and thereby increase richness. While this study did find that ECM fungal richness was unimodal with elevation, the authors convincingly argue that the absence of similar patterns in either of the other two guilds indicates that fungal species distributions based on simple geometric space-filling are not the norm. Interestingly, for ECM fungi, soil pH emerged as a significant elevation-independent driver of species richness. It is well known that some evolutionary lineages of ECM fungi (e.g. Pezizales) respond favorably to higher soil pH (peak ECM fungal richness in this study was observed at <i>c</i>. pH 6), which hints at the importance of considering how the diverse evolutionary histories of different ECM fungal lineages might differentially impact their distributions (Petersen, <span>1985</span>). The extent to which modifying soil pH might be used as a management tool to optimize or maintain ECM fungal richness is also an interesting possibility uncovered by these findings.</p>\n<p>The current working explanation for why ECM fungal richness has a unimodal latitudinal pattern globally – that temperate forests have a unique combination of higher host phylogenetic richness and stem density than tropical and boreal forests (Kennedy <i>et al</i>., <span>2012</span>; Tedersoo <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>) – was partially controlled for in the study design. Here, ECM host tree species richness was held effectively constant at each elevation and latitude, with no more than two species of ECM trees per site. However, whether the phylogenetic richness of the hosts, which increases ECM fungal richness (Nguyen <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>), or ECM host stem density including understory shrubs (Tedersoo <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>), was higher at mid-elevations was not presented. Support of nonhost-related factors driving ECM fungal richness elevation patterns has been previously demonstrated by Truong <i>et al</i>. (<span>2019</span>), who examined ECM fungal communities across a range of elevations but with a single host tree species (<i>Nothofagus pumilio</i>) in Patagonia. Although they found a similar unimodal richness pattern for ECM fungi as in this study, they also showed that fungal-associated soil enzyme activity did not change with elevation. That difference was attributed to a shift in ECM fungal composition toward specific taxa known to produce proteolytic enzymes at higher elevations. This study by Barbi <i>et al</i>. does not address whether there were similar shifts in fungal community composition with elevational gradients in Europe, but the results of Truong <i>et al</i>. (<span>2019</span>) suggest that documenting changes in richness alone is not sufficient to assess soil fungal community impacts on C and N cycling across environmental gradients.</p>\n<p>As with all scientific studies, the results of this study generate as many questions as they answer. For example, do increases in REND fungal OTU richness at higher latitudes correspond with any shifts in their facultatively saprotrophic lifestyle? For SAP fungi, given the wide diversity of substrates targeted, are there cryptic richness patterns within litter vs wood vs soil saprotrophs by elevation or latitude? For ECM fungi, are there higher-level taxonomic changes across these two gradients? For example, were there notable changes in richness for particular evolutionary lineages of ECM fungi across latitudinal or elevational gradients that could help to inform the larger pattern? ECM fungi share a dependence on their host plants for carbon, but they are morphologically and physiologically diverse, have evolved &gt; 65 times across a wide geological timescale (Tedersoo &amp; Smith, <span>2013</span>), and have diverse geographical origins, including both temperate and tropical zones (Looney <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>). As such, it will be important in future studies to more fully integrate how this evolutionary diversity also shapes the distribution patterns and functions of distinct ECM fungal lineages.</p>\n<p>Perhaps most intriguingly, is whether the authors' suggested explanation for the decreased ECM fungal richness at low elevations is correct. They speculate that the higher interval and longer history of human disturbance at low-elevation sites may erode ECM fungal OTU richness, similar to declines in ECM fungal richness across rural–urban gradients (Tatsumi <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Testing this hypothesis will require additional study, perhaps by surveying forests with different intensities and intervals of logging history (Kebli <i>et al</i>., <span>2012</span>). Regardless of these additional questions, this study provides an important step forward by demonstrating that different fungal guilds follow distinct patterns along both elevation and latitude gradients. The standardized sampling and processing approach strengthens confidence in the results, and the findings highlight the need to move beyond simplistic models that assume uniform responses across taxonomic or functional groups. As global change continues to reshape ecosystems, studies like this will be invaluable for predicting how soil fungal communities – and the ecosystem functions they support – respond to environmental shifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how soil fungal communities respond to environmental gradients is crucial for predicting ecosystem functions in a changing climate (Baldrian et al., 2023). In a recent study published in New Phytologist, Barbi et al. (2025; doi: 10.1111/nph.70012) investigate how different fungal guilds – ectomycorrhizal (ECM), saprotrophic (SAP), and root endophytic (REND) fungi – are distributed across latitudinal and elevational gradients at 17 sites throughout Europe. This work provides a much-needed perspective on whether mountains function as ‘latitudinal analogs’ for soil fungal communities and how different fungal lifestyles mediate biogeographical patterns. Their findings both confirm and challenge our prevailing understanding, particularly regarding the universality of the mid-domain effect as an explanation for fungal elevational distributions.

…the findings highlight the need to move beyond simplistic models that assume uniform responses across taxonomic or functional groups.

This study employs a standardized, continent-wide sampling protocol across sites spanning from Spain and Greece, in the south, to Iceland and Norway, in the north, ensuring robust cross-site comparability. By applying various statistical models, including joint species distribution models, the researchers capture both guild-level diversity patterns and species-specific responses to both elevational and latitudinal gradients, with a specific effort toward disentangling the impacts of climate relative to other ecological variables. This rigorous approach, combined with thorough bioinformatic analyses, meets all the important benchmarks for assessing fungal community structure at large spatial scales.

All three fungal guilds displayed a significant trend in operational taxonomic unit (OTU) richness, but none were significant for both elevation and latitude (Fig. 1). This suggests that the responses to these two gradients are not direct analogs, despite sharing similar climatic and vegetational trends. SAP fungal richness significantly decreased with increasing elevation, while REND fungal richness significantly increased with increasing latitude. By contrast, ECM fungal richness displayed a nonlinear response, showing a significant positive unimodal relationship with elevation. Importantly, for all three guilds, there was no significant interaction between the effects of elevation and latitude on OTU richness. This finding contrasts with the idea that ‘mountain passes are higher in the tropics’ (Janzen, 1967); that is, high elevations at low latitudes present more significant physiological barriers to organisms than similar elevations at higher latitudes. This result does not, however, mean that climate was not an important predictor of fungal OTU richness, as multiple climate-related variables were identified as significant explanatory variables of OTU richness in random forest models. Instead, this finding indicates that additional ecological variables beyond climate also strongly impact fungal guild spatial distributions.

Abstract Image
Fig. 1
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
Summary of species richness trends by soil fungal guild across latitude and elevation relative to trends typically observed for plants and animals.

The range of richness patterns across guilds provides strong evidence that fungal species distributions are not the product of ‘null’ ecological processes. One well-cited explanation for a unimodal richness pattern across a bounded domain is the mid-domain effect (Colwell et al., 2000), which posits that because of hard constraints at each end of the domain (i.e. a species cannot have any of its range outside the domain), more species' ranges will overlap toward the center of the domain and thereby increase richness. While this study did find that ECM fungal richness was unimodal with elevation, the authors convincingly argue that the absence of similar patterns in either of the other two guilds indicates that fungal species distributions based on simple geometric space-filling are not the norm. Interestingly, for ECM fungi, soil pH emerged as a significant elevation-independent driver of species richness. It is well known that some evolutionary lineages of ECM fungi (e.g. Pezizales) respond favorably to higher soil pH (peak ECM fungal richness in this study was observed at c. pH 6), which hints at the importance of considering how the diverse evolutionary histories of different ECM fungal lineages might differentially impact their distributions (Petersen, 1985). The extent to which modifying soil pH might be used as a management tool to optimize or maintain ECM fungal richness is also an interesting possibility uncovered by these findings.

The current working explanation for why ECM fungal richness has a unimodal latitudinal pattern globally – that temperate forests have a unique combination of higher host phylogenetic richness and stem density than tropical and boreal forests (Kennedy et al., 2012; Tedersoo et al., 2014) – was partially controlled for in the study design. Here, ECM host tree species richness was held effectively constant at each elevation and latitude, with no more than two species of ECM trees per site. However, whether the phylogenetic richness of the hosts, which increases ECM fungal richness (Nguyen et al., 2016), or ECM host stem density including understory shrubs (Tedersoo et al., 2024), was higher at mid-elevations was not presented. Support of nonhost-related factors driving ECM fungal richness elevation patterns has been previously demonstrated by Truong et al. (2019), who examined ECM fungal communities across a range of elevations but with a single host tree species (Nothofagus pumilio) in Patagonia. Although they found a similar unimodal richness pattern for ECM fungi as in this study, they also showed that fungal-associated soil enzyme activity did not change with elevation. That difference was attributed to a shift in ECM fungal composition toward specific taxa known to produce proteolytic enzymes at higher elevations. This study by Barbi et al. does not address whether there were similar shifts in fungal community composition with elevational gradients in Europe, but the results of Truong et al. (2019) suggest that documenting changes in richness alone is not sufficient to assess soil fungal community impacts on C and N cycling across environmental gradients.

As with all scientific studies, the results of this study generate as many questions as they answer. For example, do increases in REND fungal OTU richness at higher latitudes correspond with any shifts in their facultatively saprotrophic lifestyle? For SAP fungi, given the wide diversity of substrates targeted, are there cryptic richness patterns within litter vs wood vs soil saprotrophs by elevation or latitude? For ECM fungi, are there higher-level taxonomic changes across these two gradients? For example, were there notable changes in richness for particular evolutionary lineages of ECM fungi across latitudinal or elevational gradients that could help to inform the larger pattern? ECM fungi share a dependence on their host plants for carbon, but they are morphologically and physiologically diverse, have evolved > 65 times across a wide geological timescale (Tedersoo & Smith, 2013), and have diverse geographical origins, including both temperate and tropical zones (Looney et al., 2016). As such, it will be important in future studies to more fully integrate how this evolutionary diversity also shapes the distribution patterns and functions of distinct ECM fungal lineages.

Perhaps most intriguingly, is whether the authors' suggested explanation for the decreased ECM fungal richness at low elevations is correct. They speculate that the higher interval and longer history of human disturbance at low-elevation sites may erode ECM fungal OTU richness, similar to declines in ECM fungal richness across rural–urban gradients (Tatsumi et al., 2023). Testing this hypothesis will require additional study, perhaps by surveying forests with different intensities and intervals of logging history (Kebli et al., 2012). Regardless of these additional questions, this study provides an important step forward by demonstrating that different fungal guilds follow distinct patterns along both elevation and latitude gradients. The standardized sampling and processing approach strengthens confidence in the results, and the findings highlight the need to move beyond simplistic models that assume uniform responses across taxonomic or functional groups. As global change continues to reshape ecosystems, studies like this will be invaluable for predicting how soil fungal communities – and the ecosystem functions they support – respond to environmental shifts.

了解土壤真菌群落如何对环境梯度做出反应,对于预测气候变化下的生态系统功能至关重要(Baldrian 等人,2023 年)。在最近发表于《新植物学家》(New Phytologist)的一项研究中,Barbi 等人(2025;doi: 10.1111/nph.70012)调查了欧洲 17 个地点的不同真菌行会--外生菌根真菌(ECM)、嗜渍真菌(SAP)和根内生真菌(REND)--在纬度和海拔梯度上的分布情况。这项研究提供了一个亟需的视角,即山区是否具有土壤真菌群落 "纬度模拟 "的功能,以及不同的真菌生活方式如何介导生物地理模式。他们的研究结果既证实了我们的普遍认识,也对我们的认识提出了挑战,特别是关于中域效应作为真菌海拔分布解释的普遍性。......研究结果突出表明,我们有必要超越那些假定不同分类群或功能群之间反应一致的简单模式。这项研究采用了标准化的全洲取样方案,取样地点从南部的西班牙和希腊到北部的冰岛和挪威,确保了可靠的跨地点可比性。通过应用各种统计模型(包括物种联合分布模型),研究人员捕捉到了行会水平的多样性模式以及物种对海拔和纬度梯度的特异性反应,特别是努力厘清气候相对于其他生态变量的影响。这种严谨的方法与全面的生物信息学分析相结合,满足了在大空间尺度上评估真菌群落结构的所有重要基准。所有三个真菌行会都显示出操作分类单元(OTU)丰富度的显著变化趋势,但没有一个行会在海拔和纬度上都有显著变化(图 1)。这表明,尽管气候和植被趋势相似,但对这两种梯度的响应并不直接相似。随着海拔的升高,SAP 真菌的丰富度明显下降,而 REND 真菌的丰富度则随着纬度的升高而明显上升。相比之下,ECM 真菌丰富度呈现非线性反应,与海拔呈显著的正单峰关系。重要的是,对于所有三个行业来说,海拔和纬度对 OTU 丰富度的影响之间没有明显的交互作用。这一发现与 "热带地区的山口更高"(Janzen,1967 年)的观点形成了鲜明对比;也就是说,低纬度地区的高海拔比高纬度地区的类似海拔对生物构成了更大的生理障碍。不过,这一结果并不意味着气候不是真菌 OTU 丰富度的重要预测因素,因为在随机森林模型中,多个与气候相关的变量被认为是 OTU 丰富度的重要解释变量。图 1在图形浏览器中打开PowerPoint不同纬度和海拔高度的土壤真菌行业物种丰富度趋势与动植物典型趋势的对比图1各行业物种丰富度模式的范围有力地证明了真菌物种分布并非 "空 "生态过程的产物。中域效应(Colwell 等人,2000 年)是对有界域中单峰丰富度模式的一种广为流传的解释,它认为由于域两端存在硬约束(即一个物种的任何分布范围都不能超出域外),更多物种的分布范围将向域中心重叠,从而增加丰富度。虽然这项研究确实发现 ECM 真菌的丰富度随海拔高度呈单峰分布,但作者令人信服地指出,其他两个行业中没有类似的模式,这表明基于简单几何空间填充的真菌物种分布并非常态。有趣的是,对于 ECM 真菌来说,土壤 pH 值是物种丰富度的一个重要驱动因素,与海拔无关。众所周知,ECM 真菌的某些进化品系(如 Pezizales)对较高的土壤 pH 值反应良好(在本研究中,ECM 真菌的物种丰富度峰值出现在 pH 值为 6 左右时),这提示了考虑不同 ECM 真菌品系的不同进化史如何对其分布产生不同影响的重要性(Petersen,1985 年)。这些发现还揭示了一种有趣的可能性,即改变土壤 pH 值可在多大程度上被用作优化或维持 ECM 真菌丰富度的管理工具。目前对 ECM 真菌丰富度在全球具有单峰纬度模式的解释是,温带森林具有比热带和北方森林更高的寄主系统发育丰富度和茎干密度的独特组合(Kennedy 等人,2012 年;Tedersoo 等人,2009 年)。 ,2014 年)--在研究设计中进行了部分控制。在这里,每个海拔高度和纬度的 ECM 寄主树种丰富度实际上保持不变,每个地点的 ECM 树种不超过两种。不过,没有说明寄主系统发育的丰富性(这会增加 ECM 真菌的丰富性)(Nguyen 等人,2016 年)或包括林下灌木在内的 ECM 寄主茎干密度(Tedersoo 等人,2024 年)是否在中海拔地区更高。Truong 等人(2019 年)之前也证明了非寄主相关因素驱动 ECM 真菌丰富度海拔模式,他们研究了巴塔哥尼亚海拔范围内的 ECM 真菌群落,但只研究了单一寄主树种(Nothofagus pumilio)。尽管他们发现了与本研究类似的单模式 ECM 真菌丰富度模式,但他们还发现,真菌相关的土壤酶活性并没有随着海拔的升高而变化。这种差异被归因于 ECM 真菌的组成向已知在海拔较高地区能产生蛋白水解酶的特定类群转移。巴比等人的这项研究并没有解决欧洲真菌群落组成是否随着海拔梯度发生类似变化的问题,但张荣等人(2019 年)的研究结果表明,仅仅记录丰富度的变化不足以评估土壤真菌群落对跨环境梯度的碳和氮循环的影响。例如,在高纬度地区,REND真菌OTU丰富度的增加是否与它们兼性嗜渍生活方式的转变相对应?就 SAP 真菌而言,鉴于目标基质的广泛多样性,在垃圾与木材与土壤之间是否存在海拔或纬度上的隐性丰富度模式?对于 ECM 真菌,在这两个梯度上是否存在更高层次的分类变化?例如,在纬度或海拔梯度上,ECM 真菌的特定进化系的丰富度是否发生了显著变化?ECM真菌共同依赖寄主植物获取碳,但它们在形态和生理上多种多样,在广阔的地质年代范围内进化了65次(Tedersoo &amp; Smith, 2013),并且具有不同的地理起源,包括温带和热带地区(Looney等人,2016)。因此,在未来的研究中,更全面地整合这种进化多样性如何塑造了独特的 ECM 真菌系的分布模式和功能将非常重要。他们推测,在低海拔地区,人类干扰的时间间隔更长、历史更悠久,可能会侵蚀 ECM 真菌 OTU 的丰富度,这与农村-城市梯度上 ECM 真菌丰富度的下降类似(Tatsumi 等人,2023 年)。要验证这一假设,还需要更多的研究,或许可以通过调查不同强度和不同伐木历史间隔的森林(Kebli 等人,2012 年)。无论这些额外的问题是什么,这项研究都向前迈出了重要的一步,它证明了不同的真菌行会在海拔和纬度梯度上都遵循着不同的模式。标准化的取样和处理方法增强了对研究结果的信心,研究结果突出表明,有必要超越假设不同分类群或功能群反应一致的简单模式。随着全球变化不断重塑生态系统,像这样的研究对于预测土壤真菌群落及其支持的生态系统功能如何应对环境变化将是非常有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信