Orthostatic hypertension in hypertensive patients: should we bother?

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r493
Artur Fedorowski, Jens Jordan
{"title":"Orthostatic hypertension in hypertensive patients: should we bother?","authors":"Artur Fedorowski, Jens Jordan","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blood pressure should be taken in different positions Although we were taught in medical school that blood pressure should be measured in different body positions, particularly in older patients, an active standing test, in which blood pressure and heart rate are taken in supine, seated, and standing positions, is rarely done. Clinical trials, hypertension guidelines, and daily practice have over many years relied on office blood pressure measurement in the sitting position. Seated blood pressure is a well established cardiovascular risk marker, as evidenced by multiple epidemiological surveys and hypertension trials. However, important clinical information may be lost when we ignore the dynamic blood pressure response to changes in posture, which occurs many times during the day. In a linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-080507), Juraschek and colleagues report results of a systematic review of interventional trials in hypertension assessing the effect of antihypertensive therapy on occurrence of orthostatic hypertension—that is, a distinct rise in blood pressure on standing.1 The question is relevant because initial studies have suggested that antihypertensive drugs might promote orthostatic hypertension by reducing blood volume and venous return.2 But why bother about orthostatic hypertension at all? When one changes body position from supine to …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood pressure should be taken in different positions Although we were taught in medical school that blood pressure should be measured in different body positions, particularly in older patients, an active standing test, in which blood pressure and heart rate are taken in supine, seated, and standing positions, is rarely done. Clinical trials, hypertension guidelines, and daily practice have over many years relied on office blood pressure measurement in the sitting position. Seated blood pressure is a well established cardiovascular risk marker, as evidenced by multiple epidemiological surveys and hypertension trials. However, important clinical information may be lost when we ignore the dynamic blood pressure response to changes in posture, which occurs many times during the day. In a linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-080507), Juraschek and colleagues report results of a systematic review of interventional trials in hypertension assessing the effect of antihypertensive therapy on occurrence of orthostatic hypertension—that is, a distinct rise in blood pressure on standing.1 The question is relevant because initial studies have suggested that antihypertensive drugs might promote orthostatic hypertension by reducing blood volume and venous return.2 But why bother about orthostatic hypertension at all? When one changes body position from supine to …
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信