Intertransverse Process Block With Catheter Placement for Postoperative Pain Management in a Patient With Alcoholic Liver Disease and Portal Hypertension: A Case Report.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.80788
Keisuke Nakazawa, Ayano Takenaka, Takahiro Suzuki
{"title":"Intertransverse Process Block With Catheter Placement for Postoperative Pain Management in a Patient With Alcoholic Liver Disease and Portal Hypertension: A Case Report.","authors":"Keisuke Nakazawa, Ayano Takenaka, Takahiro Suzuki","doi":"10.7759/cureus.80788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidural analgesia is typically avoided in patients with portal hypertension due to multiple risk factors: engorgement of epidural venous plexuses, platelet dysfunction despite normal counts, and potential postoperative coagulopathy following liver surgery. These risks persist even when preoperative coagulation parameters appear normal. While peripheral nerve blocks are increasingly utilized for minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures, intertransverse process block (ITPB) with catheter placement offers a high-quality analgesic strategy that supports early ambulation and postoperative recovery with a significantly reduced risk profile in such patients. A 76-year-old male patient with alcoholic liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A) and a history of esophageal variceal bleeding underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy of segment 3 for suspected hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite normal coagulation parameters (prothrombin time-international normalized ratio 1.1 and activated partial thromboplastin time 33 seconds), epidural analgesia was contraindicated due to portal hypertension with multiple vascular anomalies. Bilateral ultrasound-guided ITPB was performed at the Th8-9 level with catheter placement in the intertransverse tissue complex. Analgesia was maintained with intermittent boluses of 0.25% levobupivacaine (10 mL bilaterally, twice daily) for three postoperative days, supplemented with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) fentanyl (baseline infusion 10 μg/hour, bolus dose 10 μg, lockout time 10 minutes). The patient reported minimal pain scores (numerical rating scale 0-2 at rest, 2-3 with movement), achieved early mobilization, and did not require any PCA boluses throughout recovery. Cold testing confirmed adequate sensory blockade from Th8 to Th11 on each postoperative day until catheter removal. ITPB with catheter placement provided safe and effective analgesia in a patient with portal hypertension, enabling early mobilization and rehabilitation without risking complications associated with epidural techniques. This approach represents a viable alternative to epidural analgesia in high-risk patients with compromised liver function and vascular abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 3","pages":"e80788"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidural analgesia is typically avoided in patients with portal hypertension due to multiple risk factors: engorgement of epidural venous plexuses, platelet dysfunction despite normal counts, and potential postoperative coagulopathy following liver surgery. These risks persist even when preoperative coagulation parameters appear normal. While peripheral nerve blocks are increasingly utilized for minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures, intertransverse process block (ITPB) with catheter placement offers a high-quality analgesic strategy that supports early ambulation and postoperative recovery with a significantly reduced risk profile in such patients. A 76-year-old male patient with alcoholic liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A) and a history of esophageal variceal bleeding underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy of segment 3 for suspected hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite normal coagulation parameters (prothrombin time-international normalized ratio 1.1 and activated partial thromboplastin time 33 seconds), epidural analgesia was contraindicated due to portal hypertension with multiple vascular anomalies. Bilateral ultrasound-guided ITPB was performed at the Th8-9 level with catheter placement in the intertransverse tissue complex. Analgesia was maintained with intermittent boluses of 0.25% levobupivacaine (10 mL bilaterally, twice daily) for three postoperative days, supplemented with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) fentanyl (baseline infusion 10 μg/hour, bolus dose 10 μg, lockout time 10 minutes). The patient reported minimal pain scores (numerical rating scale 0-2 at rest, 2-3 with movement), achieved early mobilization, and did not require any PCA boluses throughout recovery. Cold testing confirmed adequate sensory blockade from Th8 to Th11 on each postoperative day until catheter removal. ITPB with catheter placement provided safe and effective analgesia in a patient with portal hypertension, enabling early mobilization and rehabilitation without risking complications associated with epidural techniques. This approach represents a viable alternative to epidural analgesia in high-risk patients with compromised liver function and vascular abnormalities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信