Prognostic value of baseline RV dysfunction using TAPSE and TAPSE to PASP ratio in patients undergoing mitra-clip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anan Abu Rmilah, Ramy Ghaly, Carlos Pfeiffer, Mohamed H Saeed, Abdulrahman Khojah, Suhaib Jaber, Hossam Alzu'Bi, Aziz Tabash, Anjula Chib, Raed Darwish, Larry Prokop, Tarec K Elajami, Reza Arsanjani
{"title":"Prognostic value of baseline RV dysfunction using TAPSE and TAPSE to PASP ratio in patients undergoing mitra-clip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Anan Abu Rmilah, Ramy Ghaly, Carlos Pfeiffer, Mohamed H Saeed, Abdulrahman Khojah, Suhaib Jaber, Hossam Alzu'Bi, Aziz Tabash, Anjula Chib, Raed Darwish, Larry Prokop, Tarec K Elajami, Reza Arsanjani","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03354-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mitra-clip is an established therapy for high-risk surgical candidates who are refractory to optimal medical treatment. Reports have shown that right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. Our goal of this systematic review/meta-analysis is to assess the prognosis of baseline RV function markers including TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) and TAPSE:PASP (pulmonary artery systolic pressure) ratio after Mitra-clip. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 20th, 2023, for studies discussing the prognostic outcome of pre-existing RVD in Mitra-clip patients. Definition of RV dysfunction was reported as an abnormal TAPSE (< 15-16 mm) or RV-PA (right ventricle-pulmonary artery) uncoupling expressed as abnormal TAPSE:PASP ratio (< 0.30-0.37 mm/mmHg). We included all original research studies (excluding reviews, meta-analysis, commentaries/editorials, and animal studies) that assessed the prognostic utility of TAPSE and TAPSE:PASP ratio in patients with MR undergoing Mitra-clip. Reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the pertinent data. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twelve reports enrolling 3526 patients were included. Mean age ranged from 70 to 81 years and 61.1% patients were male. Primary, secondary, and mixed MR were reported in 36.9%, 61.4%, and 1.8% respectively. Mean LVEF ranged from 27% to 57.1% and 93.7% of patients had MR grade ≥ 3 + (at least moderate to severe MR). Patients with RVD had a reduction in the overall survival (OS) after Mitra-clip at 6 months (81.8% vs 90.5%, OR = 0.45 [0.35-0.58]; P < 0.001), 1-year (71.1% vs 85.7%, OR = 0.40 [0.33-0.48]; P < 0.001), and 2-year (60.3% vs 76.8%, OR = 0.37 [0.31-0.45]; P < 0.001) compared to normal RV group. Likewise, HF re-admission free survival was minimized among RVD patients at 6 months (76.8% vs 88.1%, OR = 0.47 [0.34-0.65]; P < 0.001), 1-year (64.5% vs 81.3%, OR = 0.44 [0.35-0.55]; P < 0.001), and 2-year (58.2% vs 78.9%, OR = 0.41 [0.30-0.56]; P < 0.001) compared to normal RV group. Decreased TAPSE: PASP was associated with lower OS at 6-month (OR = 0.46 [0.31-0.68]; P < 0.001), 1-year (OR = 0.37 [0.29-0.47]; P < 0.001), and 2-year (OR = 0.35 [0.25-0.47]; P < 0.001) and reduced HF re-admission free survival at 6-month ((OR = 0.44 [0.31-0.62]; P < 0.001), 1-year (OR = 0.41[0.31-0.54]; P < 0.001), and 2-year (OR = 0.41 [0.31-0.58]; P < 0.001) after Mitra-clip. Furthermore, decreased TAPSE negatively impacted the OS and HF re-admission at 6-month (OR = 0.40 [0.21-0.77]; P = 0.006), and 1-year (OR = 0.50 [0.31-0.80]; P = 0.004) and increased HF re-admission rate at 6-month (OR = 0.27 [0.13-0.56]; P = 0.0005), and 1-year (OR = 0.30 [0.15-0.58]; P = 0.0004). Pre-existing RVD as expressed by TAPSE < 15-16 mm or TAPSE:PASP ratio < 0.30-0.37 mmHg reduced the OS and HF readmission free survival after Mitra-clip.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"827-846"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03354-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mitra-clip is an established therapy for high-risk surgical candidates who are refractory to optimal medical treatment. Reports have shown that right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. Our goal of this systematic review/meta-analysis is to assess the prognosis of baseline RV function markers including TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) and TAPSE:PASP (pulmonary artery systolic pressure) ratio after Mitra-clip. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 20th, 2023, for studies discussing the prognostic outcome of pre-existing RVD in Mitra-clip patients. Definition of RV dysfunction was reported as an abnormal TAPSE (< 15-16 mm) or RV-PA (right ventricle-pulmonary artery) uncoupling expressed as abnormal TAPSE:PASP ratio (< 0.30-0.37 mm/mmHg). We included all original research studies (excluding reviews, meta-analysis, commentaries/editorials, and animal studies) that assessed the prognostic utility of TAPSE and TAPSE:PASP ratio in patients with MR undergoing Mitra-clip. Reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the pertinent data. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twelve reports enrolling 3526 patients were included. Mean age ranged from 70 to 81 years and 61.1% patients were male. Primary, secondary, and mixed MR were reported in 36.9%, 61.4%, and 1.8% respectively. Mean LVEF ranged from 27% to 57.1% and 93.7% of patients had MR grade ≥ 3 + (at least moderate to severe MR). Patients with RVD had a reduction in the overall survival (OS) after Mitra-clip at 6 months (81.8% vs 90.5%, OR = 0.45 [0.35-0.58]; P < 0.001), 1-year (71.1% vs 85.7%, OR = 0.40 [0.33-0.48]; P < 0.001), and 2-year (60.3% vs 76.8%, OR = 0.37 [0.31-0.45]; P < 0.001) compared to normal RV group. Likewise, HF re-admission free survival was minimized among RVD patients at 6 months (76.8% vs 88.1%, OR = 0.47 [0.34-0.65]; P < 0.001), 1-year (64.5% vs 81.3%, OR = 0.44 [0.35-0.55]; P < 0.001), and 2-year (58.2% vs 78.9%, OR = 0.41 [0.30-0.56]; P < 0.001) compared to normal RV group. Decreased TAPSE: PASP was associated with lower OS at 6-month (OR = 0.46 [0.31-0.68]; P < 0.001), 1-year (OR = 0.37 [0.29-0.47]; P < 0.001), and 2-year (OR = 0.35 [0.25-0.47]; P < 0.001) and reduced HF re-admission free survival at 6-month ((OR = 0.44 [0.31-0.62]; P < 0.001), 1-year (OR = 0.41[0.31-0.54]; P < 0.001), and 2-year (OR = 0.41 [0.31-0.58]; P < 0.001) after Mitra-clip. Furthermore, decreased TAPSE negatively impacted the OS and HF re-admission at 6-month (OR = 0.40 [0.21-0.77]; P = 0.006), and 1-year (OR = 0.50 [0.31-0.80]; P = 0.004) and increased HF re-admission rate at 6-month (OR = 0.27 [0.13-0.56]; P = 0.0005), and 1-year (OR = 0.30 [0.15-0.58]; P = 0.0004). Pre-existing RVD as expressed by TAPSE < 15-16 mm or TAPSE:PASP ratio < 0.30-0.37 mmHg reduced the OS and HF readmission free survival after Mitra-clip.

使用TAPSE和TAPSE / PASP比值对接受mitra-clip患者基线RV功能障碍的预后价值:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
Mitra-clip是一种确定的治疗方法,用于高危手术候选人,他们难以进行最佳的药物治疗。有报道表明,右心室功能障碍(RVD)与心力衰竭(HF)患者的发病率和死亡率增加有关。本系统综述/荟萃分析的目的是评估Mitra-clip后基线RV功能指标的预后,包括TAPSE(三尖瓣环平面收缩偏移)和TAPSE:PASP(肺动脉收缩压)比。MEDLINE和EMBASE从建立到2023年12月20日进行检索,以讨论Mitra-clip患者先前存在的RVD的预后结果。RV功能障碍的定义为TAPSE异常(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信