Clinical and System-Level Factors Driving Donor Lung Utilization Decisions: A Qualitative Study.

IF 5.4
Brittany Koons, James D Mendez, Michaela R Anderson, Edward Cantu, Matthew Hartwig, Christian Merlo, Krishna Pandya, Emily Vail, Jonathan P Singer, Jason D Christie
{"title":"Clinical and System-Level Factors Driving Donor Lung Utilization Decisions: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Brittany Koons, James D Mendez, Michaela R Anderson, Edward Cantu, Matthew Hartwig, Christian Merlo, Krishna Pandya, Emily Vail, Jonathan P Singer, Jason D Christie","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1175OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Key knowledge gaps exist in understanding what drives donor utilization decisions and contributes to the significant variability in organ offer acceptance rates. Defining and addressing the factors that explain variability in organ offer acceptance rates across U.S. transplant centers is a key area of need. <b>Objectives:</b> To identify the clinical and system-level factors that influence donor evaluation and graft acceptance decisions by lung transplant clinicians. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted semistructured interviews with lung transplant clinicians who actively participate in donor evaluation calls and make donor utilization decisions at a U.S. transplant center between December 2022 and September 2023. Interviews were thematically analyzed. <b>Results:</b> From 12 interviews with lung transplant pulmonologists (<i>n</i> = 6) and surgeons(<i>n</i> = 6) across eight different centers, we identified four main themes that represent distinct layers of influence on donor decision-making: <i>1</i>) variability in donor factors considered acceptable for transplant (i.e., donor age, smoking history, oxygenation, imaging) and how to consider donation after cardiac death donor offers; <i>2</i>) the complexity of matching critically ill and difficult-to-match (i.e., highly sensitized, rare blood type) candidates with offered organs; <i>3</i>) the influence of provider training and experience on decision-making; and <i>4</i>) the impact of multiple system factors, including organ allocation, transplant center experience, resources, logistics, donor data availability, donor management strategies, and collaboration with organ procurement organization staff. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings offer insight into clinical practice variability, identify areas that may be improved by policy change, highlight opportunities to improve clinical training, and identify directions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1155-1164"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1175OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Key knowledge gaps exist in understanding what drives donor utilization decisions and contributes to the significant variability in organ offer acceptance rates. Defining and addressing the factors that explain variability in organ offer acceptance rates across U.S. transplant centers is a key area of need. Objectives: To identify the clinical and system-level factors that influence donor evaluation and graft acceptance decisions by lung transplant clinicians. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with lung transplant clinicians who actively participate in donor evaluation calls and make donor utilization decisions at a U.S. transplant center between December 2022 and September 2023. Interviews were thematically analyzed. Results: From 12 interviews with lung transplant pulmonologists (n = 6) and surgeons(n = 6) across eight different centers, we identified four main themes that represent distinct layers of influence on donor decision-making: 1) variability in donor factors considered acceptable for transplant (i.e., donor age, smoking history, oxygenation, imaging) and how to consider donation after cardiac death donor offers; 2) the complexity of matching critically ill and difficult-to-match (i.e., highly sensitized, rare blood type) candidates with offered organs; 3) the influence of provider training and experience on decision-making; and 4) the impact of multiple system factors, including organ allocation, transplant center experience, resources, logistics, donor data availability, donor management strategies, and collaboration with organ procurement organization staff. Conclusions: Our findings offer insight into clinical practice variability, identify areas that may be improved by policy change, highlight opportunities to improve clinical training, and identify directions for future research.

驱动供体肺利用决策的临床和系统层面因素:一项定性研究。
理由:在理解驱动供体利用决策和导致器官提供接受率显著变化的因素方面存在关键的知识差距。定义和解决解释美国(US)移植中心器官接受率变异性的因素是一个关键的需求领域。目的:探讨影响肺移植临床医生对供体评价和移植接受决定的临床和系统因素。方法:我们对2022年12月至2023年9月期间在美国一家移植中心积极参与供体评估电话并做出供体利用决策的肺移植临床医生进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈进行主题分析。结果:通过对8个不同中心的12位肺移植内科医生(n=6)和外科医生(n=6)的访谈,我们确定了四个主要主题,它们代表了对供体决策的不同影响层面:1)移植可接受的供体因素(即供体年龄、吸烟史、氧合、影像学)的可变性以及心脏死亡供体提供后如何考虑捐赠;2)危重患者和难以匹配(即高度敏感、罕见血型)候选人与供体器官匹配的复杂性;3)提供者培训和经验对决策的影响;4)包括器官分配在内的多个系统因素的影响。移植中心的经验,资源,后勤,供体数据的可用性,供体管理策略,以及与器官采购组织工作人员的合作。结论:我们的研究结果提供了对临床实践可变性的见解,确定了政策变化可能改善的领域,突出了改善临床培训的机会,并确定了未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信