Nebulized hyaluronic acid and xylitol based solution after turbinate radiofrequency ablation. A triple blind randomized multicentric clinical trial.

Christian Calvo-Henríquez, Ainhoa García-Lliberos, Byron Maldonado-Alvarado, Miguel Rodriguez-Iglesias, David Lobo-Duro, Juan Maza-Solano, Serafín Sánchez-Gomez, Isam Alobid
{"title":"Nebulized hyaluronic acid and xylitol based solution after turbinate radiofrequency ablation. A triple blind randomized multicentric clinical trial.","authors":"Christian Calvo-Henríquez, Ainhoa García-Lliberos, Byron Maldonado-Alvarado, Miguel Rodriguez-Iglesias, David Lobo-Duro, Juan Maza-Solano, Serafín Sánchez-Gomez, Isam Alobid","doi":"10.1016/j.otoeng.2025.512218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective, triple blind randomized clinical trial aims to specifically evaluate the effect of Aluneb® (hyaluronic acid plus xilitol) in the postoperative treatment of inferior turbinate radiofrequency in adults compared to nebulized isotonic saline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing radiofrequency turbinate ablation were included. Treatment group received Aluneb® (hyaluronic acid plus xylitol) while the control group received nebulized isotonic saline for two months after treatment. Participants were studied the week before surgery (visit 0), and at 7, 15, 30 and 60 days after surgery. At all visits, participants underwent physical examination, rhinomanometry, SNOT-22, and visual analogue scale (VAS) of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 participants were recruited. Crusts (endoscopy) were less in the Aluneb® hyaluronic acid plus xylitol group. Nasal crusting, epistaxis and nasal obstruction VAS were statistically significant lower. VAS for Rhinorrea, halitosis, cacosmia and pain and nasal resistance obtained lower self-reported values in the hyaluronic acid plus xilitol group, but these differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hyaluronic acid plus xilitol demonstrated promise in improving postoperative outcomes, future studies with larger sample sizes and different surgical techniques are encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":93855,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":" ","pages":"512218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2025.512218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This prospective, triple blind randomized clinical trial aims to specifically evaluate the effect of Aluneb® (hyaluronic acid plus xilitol) in the postoperative treatment of inferior turbinate radiofrequency in adults compared to nebulized isotonic saline.

Methods: Adults undergoing radiofrequency turbinate ablation were included. Treatment group received Aluneb® (hyaluronic acid plus xylitol) while the control group received nebulized isotonic saline for two months after treatment. Participants were studied the week before surgery (visit 0), and at 7, 15, 30 and 60 days after surgery. At all visits, participants underwent physical examination, rhinomanometry, SNOT-22, and visual analogue scale (VAS) of symptoms.

Results: 34 participants were recruited. Crusts (endoscopy) were less in the Aluneb® hyaluronic acid plus xylitol group. Nasal crusting, epistaxis and nasal obstruction VAS were statistically significant lower. VAS for Rhinorrea, halitosis, cacosmia and pain and nasal resistance obtained lower self-reported values in the hyaluronic acid plus xilitol group, but these differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Hyaluronic acid plus xilitol demonstrated promise in improving postoperative outcomes, future studies with larger sample sizes and different surgical techniques are encouraged.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信