Virtual Reality Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma: Benefits and Drawbacks.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S511803
Adrian T Babel, Mohamed M Soumakieh, Allison Y Chen, Caroline Wong, Douglas R da Costa, David R P Almeida
{"title":"Virtual Reality Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma: Benefits and Drawbacks.","authors":"Adrian T Babel, Mohamed M Soumakieh, Allison Y Chen, Caroline Wong, Douglas R da Costa, David R P Almeida","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S511803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Virtual reality-assisted visual field testing (VRVFT) is a novel modality for evaluating glaucoma progression, offering potential advantages over standard automated perimetry (SAP). To date, no narrative literature review has comprehensively discussed the benefits and drawbacks of VRVFT for glaucoma patients.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, covering articles published from 2014 to October 2023. The search terms used were \"virtual reality visual field\" AND \"glaucoma\". Filters applied included \"Free full text\", \"Full text\", and \"Peer Reviewed.\" Inclusion criteria encompassed studies evaluating VRVFT in relation to glaucoma. Exclusion criteria included duplicates, meta-analyses, literature not discussing glaucoma or VRVFT, and other literature reviews. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising various study designs. VRVFT showed comparable reliability and efficacy to SAP in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects. Benefits of VRVFT included improved accessibility, patient comfort, and resource optimization. Drawbacks included technical limitations such as restricted luminance range, lack of sophisticated eye-tracking in some devices, and implementation challenges like patient technology familiarity and access to equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VRVFT presents several benefits, making it a promising alternative or complement to conventional glaucomatous visual field testing in outpatient clinics and remote settings. Addressing technical limitations and standardizing protocols are essential for broader clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"933-937"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S511803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Virtual reality-assisted visual field testing (VRVFT) is a novel modality for evaluating glaucoma progression, offering potential advantages over standard automated perimetry (SAP). To date, no narrative literature review has comprehensively discussed the benefits and drawbacks of VRVFT for glaucoma patients.

Observations: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, covering articles published from 2014 to October 2023. The search terms used were "virtual reality visual field" AND "glaucoma". Filters applied included "Free full text", "Full text", and "Peer Reviewed." Inclusion criteria encompassed studies evaluating VRVFT in relation to glaucoma. Exclusion criteria included duplicates, meta-analyses, literature not discussing glaucoma or VRVFT, and other literature reviews. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising various study designs. VRVFT showed comparable reliability and efficacy to SAP in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects. Benefits of VRVFT included improved accessibility, patient comfort, and resource optimization. Drawbacks included technical limitations such as restricted luminance range, lack of sophisticated eye-tracking in some devices, and implementation challenges like patient technology familiarity and access to equipment.

Conclusion: VRVFT presents several benefits, making it a promising alternative or complement to conventional glaucomatous visual field testing in outpatient clinics and remote settings. Addressing technical limitations and standardizing protocols are essential for broader clinical adoption.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信