Lauren C LaMonica, Thomas Hester, Reinie Thomas, Frank Wang
{"title":"Skin of colour dermatology education in US primary care residency programmes: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of programme directors.","authors":"Lauren C LaMonica, Thomas Hester, Reinie Thomas, Frank Wang","doi":"10.1093/skinhd/vzae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians-in-training report inadequate education in skin of colour (SOC) dermatology during residency. Although dermatology programmes have made progress in teaching SOC dermatology, the status of SOC dermatology education in primary care residency programmes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize SOC didactic and clinical training opportunities available to primary care residents, laying the groundwork for future curriculum development of SOC dermatology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study consisted of a nationwide 16-question survey disseminated by email between October 2022 and February 2023 to US primary care residency programmes identified using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of responding programmes (<i>n</i> = 49/1224, 4.0%), 29/49 offered SOC didactic training, most often through integration of content within general dermatology lectures (<i>n</i> = 29/49, 59.2%) and board review sessions (<i>n</i> = 13/49, 26.5%). Over half of programmes (<i>n</i> = 35/49, 71.4%) offered SOC clinical training through rotation in a general dermatology clinic (<i>n</i> = 33/49, 67.3%) and skin-related chief concerns in primary care clinics (<i>n</i> = 29/49, 59.2%). Programmes with directors indicating that they planned to incorporate SOC education into future curricula (<i>n</i> = 20/49, 40.8%) were more likely to already have SOC didactic and clinical training opportunities (<i>P</i> = 0.01 and <i>P</i> = 0.02, respectively). Regarding future directions, programme directors were most interested in integrating SOC topics within dermatology lectures (<i>n</i> = 31/49, 63.3%); identifying an expert (<i>n</i> = 31/49, 63.3%) and allocating lecture time (<i>n</i> = 10/49, 20.4%) were the most frequently cited barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some primary care programmes provide SOC dermatology didactic and clinical training opportunities, which are influenced by programme directors' willingness to incorporate such training into curricula, and present opportunities for dermatologists to educate primary care residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":74804,"journal":{"name":"Skin health and disease","volume":"5 1","pages":"9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin health and disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/skinhd/vzae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Physicians-in-training report inadequate education in skin of colour (SOC) dermatology during residency. Although dermatology programmes have made progress in teaching SOC dermatology, the status of SOC dermatology education in primary care residency programmes remains unclear.
Objectives: To characterize SOC didactic and clinical training opportunities available to primary care residents, laying the groundwork for future curriculum development of SOC dermatology.
Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of a nationwide 16-question survey disseminated by email between October 2022 and February 2023 to US primary care residency programmes identified using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database.
Results: Of responding programmes (n = 49/1224, 4.0%), 29/49 offered SOC didactic training, most often through integration of content within general dermatology lectures (n = 29/49, 59.2%) and board review sessions (n = 13/49, 26.5%). Over half of programmes (n = 35/49, 71.4%) offered SOC clinical training through rotation in a general dermatology clinic (n = 33/49, 67.3%) and skin-related chief concerns in primary care clinics (n = 29/49, 59.2%). Programmes with directors indicating that they planned to incorporate SOC education into future curricula (n = 20/49, 40.8%) were more likely to already have SOC didactic and clinical training opportunities (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). Regarding future directions, programme directors were most interested in integrating SOC topics within dermatology lectures (n = 31/49, 63.3%); identifying an expert (n = 31/49, 63.3%) and allocating lecture time (n = 10/49, 20.4%) were the most frequently cited barriers.
Conclusions: Some primary care programmes provide SOC dermatology didactic and clinical training opportunities, which are influenced by programme directors' willingness to incorporate such training into curricula, and present opportunities for dermatologists to educate primary care residents.