Outcome after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by Warshaw technique for pancreatic body cancer.

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-31 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.14701/ahbps.24-202
Endi Zhou, Guodong Shi, Hongyuan Shi, Kai Zhang, Jishu Wei, Min Tu, Zipeng Lu, Feng Guo, Jianmin Chen, Kuirong Jiang, Wentao Gao
{"title":"Outcome after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by Warshaw technique for pancreatic body cancer.","authors":"Endi Zhou, Guodong Shi, Hongyuan Shi, Kai Zhang, Jishu Wei, Min Tu, Zipeng Lu, Feng Guo, Jianmin Chen, Kuirong Jiang, Wentao Gao","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) is a common surgical procedure for pancreatic body cancer. However, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) utilizing the Warshaw technique (WT) in malignancies is generally not favored due to concerns about inadequate resection. This study aims to assess the feasibility and oncologic outcomes of employing SPDP with WT in pancreatic body cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing 21 SPDP patients with 63 DPS patients matched by propensity score from January 2018 to November 2022. Clinical outcomes and follow-up data were analyzed using R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited similar demographic, intraoperative, and pathological characteristics, with the exception of a reduced number of total lymph nodes (<i>p</i> = 0.006) in the SPDP group. There were no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications, recurrence, or metastasis. Local recurrence predominantly occurred in the central region as opposed to the spleen region. There were no cases of isolated recurrences in the splenic region. Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival times were 51.5 months for SPDP vs 30.5 months for DPS and 18.7 months vs 16.8 months, respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The incidence of partial splenic infarction and left-side portal hypertension in the SPDP group was 28.6% (6/21) and 9.5% (2/21), respectively, without necessitating splenic abscess puncture, splenectomy, or causing bleeding from perigastric varices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPDP did not negatively impact local recurrence or survival rates in selected pancreatic body cancer patients. Further studies are necessary for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"177-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) is a common surgical procedure for pancreatic body cancer. However, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) utilizing the Warshaw technique (WT) in malignancies is generally not favored due to concerns about inadequate resection. This study aims to assess the feasibility and oncologic outcomes of employing SPDP with WT in pancreatic body cancer.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing 21 SPDP patients with 63 DPS patients matched by propensity score from January 2018 to November 2022. Clinical outcomes and follow-up data were analyzed using R.

Results: Both groups exhibited similar demographic, intraoperative, and pathological characteristics, with the exception of a reduced number of total lymph nodes (p = 0.006) in the SPDP group. There were no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications, recurrence, or metastasis. Local recurrence predominantly occurred in the central region as opposed to the spleen region. There were no cases of isolated recurrences in the splenic region. Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival times were 51.5 months for SPDP vs 30.5 months for DPS and 18.7 months vs 16.8 months, respectively (p > 0.05). The incidence of partial splenic infarction and left-side portal hypertension in the SPDP group was 28.6% (6/21) and 9.5% (2/21), respectively, without necessitating splenic abscess puncture, splenectomy, or causing bleeding from perigastric varices.

Conclusions: SPDP did not negatively impact local recurrence or survival rates in selected pancreatic body cancer patients. Further studies are necessary for validation.

Warshaw技术保脾胰远端切除术治疗胰小体癌的疗效观察。
背景/目的:远端胰腺切除术联合脾切除术(DPS)是治疗胰腺体癌的常用手术方式。然而,由于担心切除不充分,在恶性肿瘤中使用Warshaw技术(WT)的保脾远端胰腺切除术(SPDP)通常不受欢迎。本研究旨在评估应用SPDP联合WT治疗胰腺体癌的可行性和肿瘤学结果。方法:我们对2018年1月至2022年11月期间21例SPDP患者和63例DPS患者进行回顾性分析,并进行倾向评分匹配。结果:两组患者的人口学特征、术中特征和病理特征相似,但SPDP组总淋巴结数减少(p = 0.006)。两组在术后并发症、复发或转移率方面无显著差异。局部复发主要发生在中央区域,而不是脾脏区域。脾区无孤立性复发病例。SPDP患者的中位总生存期和无复发生存期分别为51.5个月和30.5个月,分别为18.7个月和16.8个月(p < 0.05)。SPDP组部分性脾梗死和左侧门静脉高压症的发生率分别为28.6%(6/21)和9.5%(2/21),不需要脾脓肿穿刺、脾切除术或引起胃周静脉曲张出血。结论:在选定的胰腺体癌患者中,SPDP对局部复发率或生存率没有负面影响。需要进一步的研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信