Emotional Responses to Music Are Diminished in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Isaac L Alter, Alexander Chern, Megan E Kuhlmey, Meghan A Despotidis, Scott Kelly, Michael W Denham, Alexis S Leiderman, Anil K Lalwani
{"title":"Emotional Responses to Music Are Diminished in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.","authors":"Isaac L Alter, Alexander Chern, Megan E Kuhlmey, Meghan A Despotidis, Scott Kelly, Michael W Denham, Alexis S Leiderman, Anil K Lalwani","doi":"10.1159/000543299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emotional response to music, though a central facet of music listening, remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the emotional responses to music among bilateral cochlear implantees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bilateral CI users and normal-hearing (NH) controls were recruited from a tertiary academic center and community hearing loss groups. Participants listened (via an online survey) to ten previously validated 15-second musical clips representing multiple genres and wide range of valence (happiness vs. sadness) and arousal (excitement vs. calm), and rated the musical clips on validated nine-point visual analog scales of valence and arousal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 25 bilateral CI users and 18 NH controls completed the study. Compared to NH controls, CI users demonstrated significantly increased error in valence identification (mean (SD) 1.75 (0.61) vs. 1.16 (0.29), p<0.001), but equivalent arousal error. There were significant differences for eight of 20 total ratings between NH and CI groups. Additionally, CI users demonstrated a significantly constricted range of arousal (4.69 (1.39) vs. 6.04 (1.33), p=0.0025), but a preserved range of valence (4.99 (1.57) vs. 5.62 (1.13), p=0.13). Implantees reported significantly lower music enjoyment (5.78 (3.57) vs. 8.57 (1.17), p=0.0016) than NH controls, and enjoyment was significantly associated with both valence and arousal range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral CI users' emotional response to music is significantly constricted compared to NH controls. Blunted appreciation of emotional content likely contributes to reduced music enjoyment among cochlear implantees and is a critical target for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emotional response to music, though a central facet of music listening, remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the emotional responses to music among bilateral cochlear implantees.

Methods: Bilateral CI users and normal-hearing (NH) controls were recruited from a tertiary academic center and community hearing loss groups. Participants listened (via an online survey) to ten previously validated 15-second musical clips representing multiple genres and wide range of valence (happiness vs. sadness) and arousal (excitement vs. calm), and rated the musical clips on validated nine-point visual analog scales of valence and arousal.

Results: In total, 25 bilateral CI users and 18 NH controls completed the study. Compared to NH controls, CI users demonstrated significantly increased error in valence identification (mean (SD) 1.75 (0.61) vs. 1.16 (0.29), p<0.001), but equivalent arousal error. There were significant differences for eight of 20 total ratings between NH and CI groups. Additionally, CI users demonstrated a significantly constricted range of arousal (4.69 (1.39) vs. 6.04 (1.33), p=0.0025), but a preserved range of valence (4.99 (1.57) vs. 5.62 (1.13), p=0.13). Implantees reported significantly lower music enjoyment (5.78 (3.57) vs. 8.57 (1.17), p=0.0016) than NH controls, and enjoyment was significantly associated with both valence and arousal range.

Conclusions: Bilateral CI users' emotional response to music is significantly constricted compared to NH controls. Blunted appreciation of emotional content likely contributes to reduced music enjoyment among cochlear implantees and is a critical target for improvement.

双侧人工耳蜗使用者对音乐的情绪反应减弱。
对音乐的情感反应,虽然是音乐聆听的一个核心方面,但仍然知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们研究了双侧耳蜗植入者对音乐的情绪反应。方法:从某三级学术中心和社区听力损失人群中招募双侧CI使用者和正常听力(NH)对照组。参与者(通过在线调查)听了10个先前经过验证的15秒音乐片段,这些音乐片段代表了多种类型和广泛的效价(快乐vs悲伤)和唤醒(兴奋vs平静),并根据效价和唤醒的9分视觉模拟量表对音乐片段进行了评分。结果:共有25名双侧CI使用者和18名NH对照组完成了研究。与NH对照组相比,CI使用者在效价识别上的误差显著增加(平均(SD) 1.75(0.61)比1.16(0.29))。结论:与NH对照组相比,双侧CI使用者对音乐的情绪反应明显受到限制。对情感内容的迟钝欣赏可能会导致耳蜗植入者对音乐的享受减少,这是改善的关键目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信