In vitro assessment of needle and irrigant penetration when using different irrigation needle tips.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v12.42896
Hussain Saleha, Bjørndal Lars, Markvart Merete
{"title":"In vitro assessment of needle and irrigant penetration when using different irrigation needle tips.","authors":"Hussain Saleha, Bjørndal Lars, Markvart Merete","doi":"10.2340/biid.v12.42896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the needle and irrigant penetration depth of a newly developed multi-vented polymer needle (30G), with three established needle designs - an open-ended metal needle (30G), a side-vented polymer needle (30G), and a notched metal needle (27G) used as a reference control. The effect of manual dynamic activation (MDA) was also measured. The null hypotheses were that the irrigant penetration would be the same regardless of needle tip, and the addition of MDA would make no difference in terms of irrigant penetration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 120 mesial roots from mandibular molars were instrumented to a size 25/07, with reciprocating files. The maximum needle penetration depth was measured for each needle tip, using a rubber stop. Syringe irrigation was performed using a sodium diatrizoate solution, first with needle placement halfway down the root canal (working length subtracted from the canal length), and then 1 mm from the working length. MDA was performed. A digital radiograph was taken before the initial irrigation, after the initial irrigation, after the final irrigation, and after MDA. Digital subtraction was performed, and irrigant penetration was measured by a blinded operator. Non-parametric statistical tests were conducted using Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multi-vented polymer needle had a significantly deeper needle penetration (mean value: 99%), compared to other test needles. The deepest irrigant penetration was achieved using the multi-vented polymer needle (mean value: 98%) and the open-ended metal needle (mean value: 99%). A significantly deeper irrigant penetration, was achieved by adding MDA, regardless of needle tip.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multi-vented polymer needle and the open-ended metal needle showed superior performance in terms of irrigant penetration. However, the irrigant penetration only managed to reach the working length when MDA was added.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"12 ","pages":"42896"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.42896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the needle and irrigant penetration depth of a newly developed multi-vented polymer needle (30G), with three established needle designs - an open-ended metal needle (30G), a side-vented polymer needle (30G), and a notched metal needle (27G) used as a reference control. The effect of manual dynamic activation (MDA) was also measured. The null hypotheses were that the irrigant penetration would be the same regardless of needle tip, and the addition of MDA would make no difference in terms of irrigant penetration.

Materials and methods: A total of 120 mesial roots from mandibular molars were instrumented to a size 25/07, with reciprocating files. The maximum needle penetration depth was measured for each needle tip, using a rubber stop. Syringe irrigation was performed using a sodium diatrizoate solution, first with needle placement halfway down the root canal (working length subtracted from the canal length), and then 1 mm from the working length. MDA was performed. A digital radiograph was taken before the initial irrigation, after the initial irrigation, after the final irrigation, and after MDA. Digital subtraction was performed, and irrigant penetration was measured by a blinded operator. Non-parametric statistical tests were conducted using Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: The multi-vented polymer needle had a significantly deeper needle penetration (mean value: 99%), compared to other test needles. The deepest irrigant penetration was achieved using the multi-vented polymer needle (mean value: 98%) and the open-ended metal needle (mean value: 99%). A significantly deeper irrigant penetration, was achieved by adding MDA, regardless of needle tip.

Conclusions: The multi-vented polymer needle and the open-ended metal needle showed superior performance in terms of irrigant penetration. However, the irrigant penetration only managed to reach the working length when MDA was added.

用不同的冲洗针尖对针和冲洗液穿入的体外评价。
目的:本研究的目的是比较新开发的多通气聚合物针头(30G)与三种已建立的针头设计-开放式金属针头(30G),侧通气聚合物针头(30G)和缺口金属针头(27G)作为对照的针头和冲洗深度。测定了人工动态活化(MDA)的效果。零假设是,无论针尖如何,冲洗剂的穿透性都是相同的,并且MDA的添加对冲洗剂的穿透性没有影响。材料和方法:使用往复锉,将120根下颌磨牙近中根矫治至25/07尺寸。使用橡胶止点测量每个针尖的最大针入深度。使用游离钠溶液进行注射器冲洗,首先将针头放置在根管的一半位置(工作长度减去根管长度),然后从工作长度中减去1mm。进行MDA检测。在初始灌溉前、初始灌溉后、最终灌溉后和MDA后分别拍摄数字x线片。进行数字减法,并由盲操作人员测量灌溉水渗透。非参数统计检验采用Mann-Whitney u检验和Wilcoxon sign -rank检验。结果:与其他测试针头相比,多通气聚合物针头的针头穿透力明显更深(平均值:99%)。使用多通气聚合物针(平均值:98%)和开放式金属针(平均值:99%)实现了最深的冲洗穿透。通过添加MDA,无论针尖如何,都可以获得明显更深的灌溉水穿透。结论:多孔聚合物针与开口金属针在灌洗穿入方面表现优越。然而,只有在添加MDA时,灌水穿透才达到工作长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信