Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Handheld Robotic Needle Holder Versus Conventional Instrument in Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Positive Parallel Controlled, and Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Zhiyong Wen, Yonglian Guo, Ziqiang Dong, Kun Yang, Xinghuan Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Handheld Robotic Needle Holder Versus Conventional Instrument in Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Positive Parallel Controlled, and Noninferiority Clinical Trial.","authors":"Zhiyong Wen, Yonglian Guo, Ziqiang Dong, Kun Yang, Xinghuan Wang","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of the HTH-1 handheld robotic needle holder versus conventional instrument in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a noninferiority clinical trial conducted in three hospitals. Patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into the experimental or control group on whom laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed with the ureteral incision sutured using the HTH-1 and conventional needle holder, respectively. The average suture time per stitch (STPS) of ureter was calculated as the primary efficacy indicator. Postoperative drainage volumes were recorded, and the instruments' operating performance was subjectively evaluated and compared between groups. Adverse events occurred during the trial and interference of the instruments to the monitor were assessed as the safety indicators. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From April to September 2018, 50 patients were enrolled with 25 ones in each group. For the efficacy indicators, the noninferiority of the STPS was determined when the noninferiority margin was 40 seconds. The postoperative drainage volumes were not significantly different between groups. The instruments' operating performance was rated as smooth in all cases of both groups. For the safety indicators, no adverse events or interference of the instruments to the monitor occurred during surgery in any case. Clavien 1 complications occurred in 7 (4 in the experimental group versus 3 in the control group, <i>P</i> = 1.000) patients after surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The HTH-1 is effective and safe and noninferior to conventional needle holder in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Adequate training and skills assessment are needed before application on patients. <b><i>Clinical trial registration:</i></b> The clinical trial registration was completed in Jiangsu Provincial Drug Administration (record number: Suxielinbei 20180018).</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of the HTH-1 handheld robotic needle holder versus conventional instrument in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Methods: This is a noninferiority clinical trial conducted in three hospitals. Patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into the experimental or control group on whom laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed with the ureteral incision sutured using the HTH-1 and conventional needle holder, respectively. The average suture time per stitch (STPS) of ureter was calculated as the primary efficacy indicator. Postoperative drainage volumes were recorded, and the instruments' operating performance was subjectively evaluated and compared between groups. Adverse events occurred during the trial and interference of the instruments to the monitor were assessed as the safety indicators. Results: From April to September 2018, 50 patients were enrolled with 25 ones in each group. For the efficacy indicators, the noninferiority of the STPS was determined when the noninferiority margin was 40 seconds. The postoperative drainage volumes were not significantly different between groups. The instruments' operating performance was rated as smooth in all cases of both groups. For the safety indicators, no adverse events or interference of the instruments to the monitor occurred during surgery in any case. Clavien 1 complications occurred in 7 (4 in the experimental group versus 3 in the control group, P = 1.000) patients after surgery. Conclusions: The HTH-1 is effective and safe and noninferior to conventional needle holder in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Adequate training and skills assessment are needed before application on patients. Clinical trial registration: The clinical trial registration was completed in Jiangsu Provincial Drug Administration (record number: Suxielinbei 20180018).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信