Histological and morphometrical evaluation of non-critical bone defects after treatment with biomaterial and bisphosphonates.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
G-V Fernandes, B-G Martins, A Heboyan, R-M Castilho, J-C Fernandes
{"title":"Histological and morphometrical evaluation of non-critical bone defects after treatment with biomaterial and bisphosphonates.","authors":"G-V Fernandes, B-G Martins, A Heboyan, R-M Castilho, J-C Fernandes","doi":"10.4317/medoral.27033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary goal of this in vivo study was to ascertain if systemic bisphosphonates (BPs) positively affect bone repair in non-critical defects when assisted with a carbonated hydroxyapatite graft biomaterial (Biomat).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-six female rats were allocated into two control groups (blood clot [BC] and alloplastic biomaterial); two groups with zoledronate (third-generation BPs): Zol.BP and Zol.BP+Biomat; and two groups with clodronate (first-generation BPs): Clod.BP and the Clod.BP+Biomat. The experimental groups started the application of BP 60 days before surgery. Then, a 2 mm non-critical defect was performed in the rats' femur and filled according to the group. All animals were euthanized 30 days after surgery, and the samples were collected for histological and histomorphometry analysis, respectively, for descriptive and quantitative analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zol.BP+Biomat had greater new bone formation, whereas clodronate presented high osteogenic potential, significantly increasing the observed levels of newly formed bone even in the absence of the biomaterial. Histomorphometrically, BC had 2% bone formation compared to the biomaterial group (5%). Zol.BP and Col.BP achieved bone formation of 6-fold (12%, p>0.05) and 9.5-fold (19%, p<0.05), respectively, when compared with BC. Zol.BP+Biomat group presented the highest value found for newly formed bone (24%), 12-fold more than BC (p<0.001) and 4.8-fold more than the biomaterial group (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible to conclude that the systemic use of BP positively affected non-critical bone defects when associated with biomaterials, mainly when the third generation of BPs was used in this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":49016,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.27033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary goal of this in vivo study was to ascertain if systemic bisphosphonates (BPs) positively affect bone repair in non-critical defects when assisted with a carbonated hydroxyapatite graft biomaterial (Biomat).

Material and methods: Thirty-six female rats were allocated into two control groups (blood clot [BC] and alloplastic biomaterial); two groups with zoledronate (third-generation BPs): Zol.BP and Zol.BP+Biomat; and two groups with clodronate (first-generation BPs): Clod.BP and the Clod.BP+Biomat. The experimental groups started the application of BP 60 days before surgery. Then, a 2 mm non-critical defect was performed in the rats' femur and filled according to the group. All animals were euthanized 30 days after surgery, and the samples were collected for histological and histomorphometry analysis, respectively, for descriptive and quantitative analyses.

Results: Zol.BP+Biomat had greater new bone formation, whereas clodronate presented high osteogenic potential, significantly increasing the observed levels of newly formed bone even in the absence of the biomaterial. Histomorphometrically, BC had 2% bone formation compared to the biomaterial group (5%). Zol.BP and Col.BP achieved bone formation of 6-fold (12%, p>0.05) and 9.5-fold (19%, p<0.05), respectively, when compared with BC. Zol.BP+Biomat group presented the highest value found for newly formed bone (24%), 12-fold more than BC (p<0.001) and 4.8-fold more than the biomaterial group (p<0.01).

Conclusions: It is possible to conclude that the systemic use of BP positively affected non-critical bone defects when associated with biomaterials, mainly when the third generation of BPs was used in this association.

使用生物材料和双膦酸盐治疗非临界骨缺损后的组织学和形态学评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: 1. Oral Medicine and Pathology: Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on the oral cavity. 2. Oral Surgery: Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management of diseases affecting head and neck areas. 3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry: Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients. 4. Implantology 5. Periodontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信