Factors affecting outcomes of indirect decompression after oblique and lateral lumbar interbody fusions.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kyle M M Behrens, Hossein Elgafy
{"title":"Factors affecting outcomes of indirect decompression after oblique and lateral lumbar interbody fusions.","authors":"Kyle M M Behrens, Hossein Elgafy","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.100772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this editorial, the authors of this paper comment on the article by Bokov <i>et al</i> published in the recent issue of <i>World Journal of Orthopedics</i>. We reviewed a general overview of oblique lumbar interbody fusions (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF), their indications and complications as an increasingly popular minimally invasive technique to address several lumbar pathologies. This editorial thoroughly discusses and reviews the literature regarding factors affecting outcomes of indirect decompression utilized through OLIF and LLIF procedures. Several parameters play a critical role in patient outcomes including restoration of disc height, foraminal height, central canal squared, and foraminal area. The indirect decompression allows for unbuckling of the ligamentum flavum which can significantly decompress the neural elements as well as aid in reduction of spondylolisthesis. However, the authors further highlight the limitations of indirect decompression and factors that may predict unsuccessful outcomes including bony foraminal stenosis, severe central canal stenosis, and osteoporosis. As a result, failure of indirect decompression can lead to persistent pain, radiculopathy and unsatisfied patients. Spinal surgeons may be left to reimage patients and consider additional procedures with direct decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 3","pages":"100772"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.100772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this editorial, the authors of this paper comment on the article by Bokov et al published in the recent issue of World Journal of Orthopedics. We reviewed a general overview of oblique lumbar interbody fusions (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF), their indications and complications as an increasingly popular minimally invasive technique to address several lumbar pathologies. This editorial thoroughly discusses and reviews the literature regarding factors affecting outcomes of indirect decompression utilized through OLIF and LLIF procedures. Several parameters play a critical role in patient outcomes including restoration of disc height, foraminal height, central canal squared, and foraminal area. The indirect decompression allows for unbuckling of the ligamentum flavum which can significantly decompress the neural elements as well as aid in reduction of spondylolisthesis. However, the authors further highlight the limitations of indirect decompression and factors that may predict unsuccessful outcomes including bony foraminal stenosis, severe central canal stenosis, and osteoporosis. As a result, failure of indirect decompression can lead to persistent pain, radiculopathy and unsatisfied patients. Spinal surgeons may be left to reimage patients and consider additional procedures with direct decompression.

影响斜位和侧位腰椎椎间融合术后间接减压效果的因素。
在这篇社论中,这篇论文的作者对Bokov等人发表在最近一期《世界骨科杂志》上的文章进行了评论。我们回顾了斜腰椎椎体间融合术(OLIF)和侧腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)的总体概况,它们的适应症和并发症作为一种日益流行的微创技术来治疗几种腰椎疾病。这篇社论对影响通过OLIF和LLIF手术间接减压结果的因素进行了深入的讨论和回顾。几个参数在患者预后中起关键作用,包括椎间盘高度、椎间孔高度、中央椎管平方和椎间孔面积的恢复。间接减压允许解除黄韧带的屈曲,这可以显着减压神经元件,并有助于减少脊柱滑脱。然而,作者进一步强调了间接减压的局限性和可能预测不成功结果的因素,包括骨间孔狭窄、严重中央椎管狭窄和骨质疏松症。因此,间接减压失败可导致持续疼痛、神经根病和患者不满意。脊柱外科医生可能会对患者进行重新成像,并考虑直接减压的其他手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信