Defensive Responses to Implicit Association Tests and Bias Awareness in an Implicit Bias Mitigation Training.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S492884
Janice Sabin, Eric Mick, Ethan Eisdorfer, Majid Yazdani, Maria M Garcia, Janet Fraser Hale, Jill Terrien, Geraldine Puerto, Vennesa Duodu, Valerie Zolezzi-Wyndham, Joshua Rumbut, Joanne Calista, Olga Valdman, Stacy Potts, Jeroan Allison, Michele Pugnaire, Jennifer Tjia
{"title":"Defensive Responses to Implicit Association Tests and Bias Awareness in an Implicit Bias Mitigation Training.","authors":"Janice Sabin, Eric Mick, Ethan Eisdorfer, Majid Yazdani, Maria M Garcia, Janet Fraser Hale, Jill Terrien, Geraldine Puerto, Vennesa Duodu, Valerie Zolezzi-Wyndham, Joshua Rumbut, Joanne Calista, Olga Valdman, Stacy Potts, Jeroan Allison, Michele Pugnaire, Jennifer Tjia","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S492884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implicit bias education that utilizes the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to raise self-awareness of bias can induce defensiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe clinical learners' bias awareness, self-perceptions of bias relative to colleagues (better-than-average), implicit and explicit biases and defensive response to the IATs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Internal medicine and family medicine residents, and Doctor of Nursing Practice students at a public medical and nursing school affiliated with a disproportionate share hospital and who completed an implicit bias recognition and mitigation educational program (including didactics, IATs, and communication skills training and practice with standardized patients) in 2018-2019.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>We measured implicit and explicit attitudes and stereotypes, reactions to IAT results (defensive or not defensive), better-than-average perceptions, bias awareness and participants' characteristics. We examined associations between defensive responses to the IAT and participant characteristics, self-reported explicit biases, bias awareness within self, society, and healthcare, and IAT scores.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of N=61 respondents, 57% were female and 59% White. We found moderate implicit bias favoring White people versus Black people, weak bias favoring White people versus Hispanic/Latinx people and moderate bias favoring White people on both race and ethnicity medical compliance stereotype IATs. Participants demonstrated awareness of bias in society and healthcare, but not within self. Eighteen percent were defensive regarding their IAT results. Perceptions of own bias (self) were always of their having less bias than their colleagues, and they were better-than-average. There were no statistically significant associations between IAT scores and participant demographics and no interaction effect between implicit bias, defensiveness and better-than-average scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical learners hold moderate implicit biases, believe they have less bias than others, and almost 1-in-5 have a defensive response to IAT feedback. It is important to design implicit bias educational interventions to include reflection on personal bias and provide a safe environment to minimize defensiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"419-430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S492884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implicit bias education that utilizes the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to raise self-awareness of bias can induce defensiveness.

Objective: To describe clinical learners' bias awareness, self-perceptions of bias relative to colleagues (better-than-average), implicit and explicit biases and defensive response to the IATs.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Participants: Internal medicine and family medicine residents, and Doctor of Nursing Practice students at a public medical and nursing school affiliated with a disproportionate share hospital and who completed an implicit bias recognition and mitigation educational program (including didactics, IATs, and communication skills training and practice with standardized patients) in 2018-2019.

Main measures: We measured implicit and explicit attitudes and stereotypes, reactions to IAT results (defensive or not defensive), better-than-average perceptions, bias awareness and participants' characteristics. We examined associations between defensive responses to the IAT and participant characteristics, self-reported explicit biases, bias awareness within self, society, and healthcare, and IAT scores.

Key results: Of N=61 respondents, 57% were female and 59% White. We found moderate implicit bias favoring White people versus Black people, weak bias favoring White people versus Hispanic/Latinx people and moderate bias favoring White people on both race and ethnicity medical compliance stereotype IATs. Participants demonstrated awareness of bias in society and healthcare, but not within self. Eighteen percent were defensive regarding their IAT results. Perceptions of own bias (self) were always of their having less bias than their colleagues, and they were better-than-average. There were no statistically significant associations between IAT scores and participant demographics and no interaction effect between implicit bias, defensiveness and better-than-average scores.

Conclusion: Clinical learners hold moderate implicit biases, believe they have less bias than others, and almost 1-in-5 have a defensive response to IAT feedback. It is important to design implicit bias educational interventions to include reflection on personal bias and provide a safe environment to minimize defensiveness.

对内隐联想测试的防御性反应和内隐偏见缓解培训中的偏见意识。
背景:利用内隐联想测验(IAT)来提高对偏见的自我意识的内隐偏见教育可能会引起防御性反应:描述临床学习者的偏见意识、相对于同事的自我偏见感知(优于平均水平)、隐性和显性偏见以及对 IAT 的防御性反应:设计:横断面研究:内科和全科住院医师,以及一所公立医护学校的护理实践博士生,他们隶属于一家比例失调医院,并在 2018-2019 年完成了一项隐性偏见识别和缓解教育计划(包括说教、IATs、沟通技巧培训以及与标准化患者的练习).主要测量指标:我们测量了内隐和外显的态度和刻板印象、对 IAT 结果的反应(防御性或非防御性)、优于平均水平的认知、偏见意识和参与者的特征。我们研究了对 IAT 的防御性反应与参与者特征、自我报告的显性偏见、对自我、社会和医疗保健的偏见意识以及 IAT 分数之间的关联:在 61 名受访者中,57% 为女性,59% 为白人。我们发现,在种族和民族医疗依从刻板印象 IAT 上,白人相对于黑人有中度的内隐偏见,白人相对于西班牙裔/拉丁裔有较弱的偏见,白人相对于西班牙裔/拉丁裔有中度的偏见。参与者表现出了对社会和医疗中的偏见的认识,但对自身的偏见认识不足。18%的人对自己的 IAT 结果持防御态度。对自身偏见的认知(自我)总是认为自己的偏见比同事少,而且好于平均水平。IAT 分数与参与者的人口统计学特征之间没有统计学意义上的关联,内隐偏见、防御性和优于平均分数之间也没有交互效应:临床学习者持有中等程度的内隐偏见,认为自己的偏见比其他人少,几乎五分之一的人对 IAT 反馈有防御性反应。在设计内隐偏见教育干预措施时,必须包括对个人偏见的反思,并提供一个安全的环境,以最大限度地减少防御性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信