{"title":"The Effectiveness of the Student-Centered Flipped Classroom Approach in Medical Anatomy Teaching: A Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"Qianyin Yao, Peiyi Zhu, Xintian Yu, Yatao Cheng, Weigang Cui, Qin Liu","doi":"10.1002/ca.24267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Anatomy, a cornerstone of medical education, is crucial for cultivating clinical skills among medical students. However, traditional anatomy teaching models face challenges such as insufficient learning outcomes and inadequate preparation for clinical application. Flipped Classroom teaching methods, which combine the flexibility of online learning with interactivity within groups, can offer new ways of addressing these challenges. In this quasi-experimental study, a convenience sample of first-year clinical medical students was recruited and divided into an experimental group (EG, <i>n</i> = 67) and a control group (CG, <i>n</i> = 59). The EG received the Flipped Classroom (FC) teaching method, while the CG received traditional Face-to-Face (F2F) teaching throughout an 18-week basic anatomy course. The study compared knowledge proficiency, self-directed learning ability, and classroom participation between the two groups. The results revealed no significant differences in knowledge proficiency scores (<i>t</i> = 0.938, <i>p</i> = 0.35), but students in the EG obtained significantly higher scores for self-directed learning ability (<i>t</i> = 3.078, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and classroom participation (<i>t</i> = 3.936, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than students in the CG. Although there were no significant differences in participants' knowledge levels, students who received the Flipped Classroom model improved significantly in self-directed learning ability and classroom participation. This study not only provides practical guidance for educational practice but also offers empirical support for research on educational theory.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"38 4","pages":"496-504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.24267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anatomy, a cornerstone of medical education, is crucial for cultivating clinical skills among medical students. However, traditional anatomy teaching models face challenges such as insufficient learning outcomes and inadequate preparation for clinical application. Flipped Classroom teaching methods, which combine the flexibility of online learning with interactivity within groups, can offer new ways of addressing these challenges. In this quasi-experimental study, a convenience sample of first-year clinical medical students was recruited and divided into an experimental group (EG, n = 67) and a control group (CG, n = 59). The EG received the Flipped Classroom (FC) teaching method, while the CG received traditional Face-to-Face (F2F) teaching throughout an 18-week basic anatomy course. The study compared knowledge proficiency, self-directed learning ability, and classroom participation between the two groups. The results revealed no significant differences in knowledge proficiency scores (t = 0.938, p = 0.35), but students in the EG obtained significantly higher scores for self-directed learning ability (t = 3.078, p < 0.05) and classroom participation (t = 3.936, p < 0.001) than students in the CG. Although there were no significant differences in participants' knowledge levels, students who received the Flipped Classroom model improved significantly in self-directed learning ability and classroom participation. This study not only provides practical guidance for educational practice but also offers empirical support for research on educational theory.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.