Nurses' and midwives' job satisfaction and retention during COVID-19: a scoping review.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Laura Hynes, Sadie Geraghty, Sheena McChlery, Aisling Smyth, Reeti Brar, Karen Clark-Burg
{"title":"Nurses' and midwives' job satisfaction and retention during COVID-19: a scoping review.","authors":"Laura Hynes, Sadie Geraghty, Sheena McChlery, Aisling Smyth, Reeti Brar, Karen Clark-Burg","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02908-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic focused attention on the previously well-documented world-wide shortage of nurses and midwives. The pandemic accentuated this crisis, which resulted in nurses and midwives questioning their roles and their careers. The impact of the pandemic on job satisfaction and the intention of nurses and midwives to stay has not been adequately explored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to identify and map the literature that describes the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influenced nurses' and midwives' job satisfaction and intent to stay or leave their employment or profession during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Studies written in English and published between 2019 and December 2023 were included, and consisted of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were the key information sources. The search terms for this review were developed using the PCC mnemonic: Population, Concept and Context. The JBI approach to sources selection, data extraction and presentation of data was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1833 relevant articles were identified. Of these, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. Ten factors were identified as impacting on nurses and midwives job satisfaction and retention during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings reveal key factors, such as patient acuity, staffing dynamics, leadership quality, and resource availability, have significantly shaped the professional experiences of nurses and midwives during the pandemic. These insights can inform targeted policies and interventions to improve job satisfaction and retention, while future research should address gaps, particularly the unique challenges faced by midwives, to strengthen the healthcare workforce for future crises.</p><p><strong>Problem: </strong>Little is known about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on job satisfaction and intention to stay among nurses and midwives.</p><p><strong>What is already known: </strong>The pandemic resulted in unprecedented and demanding working environments for nurses and midwives.</p><p><strong>What this paper adds: </strong>This scoping review maps the intrinsic and extrinsic factors regarding nurses' and midwives' job satisfaction and intent to stay in their professions during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were multifaceted challenges and adaptations in the nursing and midwifery work environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. More research is required, especially about the effects of the pandemic on midwives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02908-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic focused attention on the previously well-documented world-wide shortage of nurses and midwives. The pandemic accentuated this crisis, which resulted in nurses and midwives questioning their roles and their careers. The impact of the pandemic on job satisfaction and the intention of nurses and midwives to stay has not been adequately explored.

Aim: The aim of this scoping review was to identify and map the literature that describes the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influenced nurses' and midwives' job satisfaction and intent to stay or leave their employment or profession during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method: This scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Studies written in English and published between 2019 and December 2023 were included, and consisted of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were the key information sources. The search terms for this review were developed using the PCC mnemonic: Population, Concept and Context. The JBI approach to sources selection, data extraction and presentation of data was used.

Results: A total of 1833 relevant articles were identified. Of these, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. Ten factors were identified as impacting on nurses and midwives job satisfaction and retention during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion: The findings reveal key factors, such as patient acuity, staffing dynamics, leadership quality, and resource availability, have significantly shaped the professional experiences of nurses and midwives during the pandemic. These insights can inform targeted policies and interventions to improve job satisfaction and retention, while future research should address gaps, particularly the unique challenges faced by midwives, to strengthen the healthcare workforce for future crises.

Problem: Little is known about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on job satisfaction and intention to stay among nurses and midwives.

What is already known: The pandemic resulted in unprecedented and demanding working environments for nurses and midwives.

What this paper adds: This scoping review maps the intrinsic and extrinsic factors regarding nurses' and midwives' job satisfaction and intent to stay in their professions during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were multifaceted challenges and adaptations in the nursing and midwifery work environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. More research is required, especially about the effects of the pandemic on midwives.

COVID-19期间护士和助产士的工作满意度和留任率:范围审查
背景:COVID-19大流行将注意力集中在以前有充分记录的全球护士和助产士短缺问题上。大流行加剧了这一危机,导致护士和助产士质疑自己的角色和职业。大流行对工作满意度和护士和助产士留下来的意愿的影响尚未得到充分探讨。目的:本范围综述的目的是识别和绘制描述在COVID-19大流行期间影响护士和助产士工作满意度以及留在或离开其工作或职业意向的内在和外在因素的文献。方法:根据范围审查的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)和乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)指南进行范围审查。纳入了2019年至2023年12月期间发表的英文研究,包括定量、定性和混合方法研究。MEDLINE、CINAHL和PsychINFO是主要信息源。本综述的搜索词是使用PCC助记符开发的:人口、概念和上下文。使用JBI方法进行源选择、数据提取和数据表示。结果:共检出相关文献1833篇。其中,17篇文章符合纳入标准。在COVID-19大流行期间,确定了影响护士和助产士工作满意度和留任率的十个因素。结论:调查结果显示,在大流行期间,患者敏锐度、人员配备动态、领导质量和资源可用性等关键因素显著影响了护士和助产士的专业经验。这些见解可以为有针对性的政策和干预措施提供信息,以提高工作满意度和保留率,而未来的研究应该解决差距,特别是助产士面临的独特挑战,以加强未来危机的医疗保健劳动力。问题:COVID-19大流行对护士和助产士的工作满意度和留任意愿的影响知之甚少。已知情况:大流行给护士和助产士带来了前所未有的严苛工作环境。本文补充的内容:本范围审查描绘了在COVID-19大流行期间护士和助产士的工作满意度和留在其职业中的意图的内在和外在因素。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,护理和助产工作环境面临多方面的挑战和调整。需要更多的研究,特别是关于大流行对助产士的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信