Current Care and Barriers to Optimal Care of People With Hip Fracture: A Survey of Hospitals in New South Wales, Australia.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593251327551
Danielle Ní Chróinín, Zsolt J Balogh, Jennifer Smith, Glen Pang, Jessica Wragg, Magnolia Cardona
{"title":"Current Care and Barriers to Optimal Care of People With Hip Fracture: A Survey of Hospitals in New South Wales, Australia.","authors":"Danielle Ní Chróinín, Zsolt J Balogh, Jennifer Smith, Glen Pang, Jessica Wragg, Magnolia Cardona","doi":"10.1177/21514593251327551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fragility hip fractures are a common and often devastating event, and a shared care approach between orthopaedics and geriatrics can improve patient, health service and quality of care outcomes. The aim of this cross-sectional survey, administered to all hospitals caring for patients with acute hip fracture, in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, was to establish current models of care (e.g. shared care or other), and barriers and facilitators of best care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A combination of quantitative and free-text data was collected. In total, 30/36 (83%) hospitals responded, with representation from all 15 state local health districts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 21/30 had a formal orthopedic surgery/geriatric medicine shared care model; orthopaedic surgery admission with routine (ortho)geriatrician input was commonest (13/21). Multiple barriers to optimal hip fracture care were identified along the various stages of the national guideline-recommended care pathway. Common barriers reported included staffing deficits (for pain assessment, fascia iliaca block administration) and gaps in service structure (lack of specialist services for refracture prevention). Multidisciplinary meetings were in place to enable best care and to promote team communication, but were impeded by absence of relevant team members (8/16). Free-text themes of enablers of good practice included clear escalation and hand-over processes, multidisciplinary communication strategies, and guideline-aligned clinical pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moving forward, addressing common barriers such as staffing and knowledge deficits, and harnessing enablers of good practice such as multidisciplinary communication and support, combined with effective implementation strategies, are likely to optimize care for patients with hip fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"16 ","pages":"21514593251327551"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593251327551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fragility hip fractures are a common and often devastating event, and a shared care approach between orthopaedics and geriatrics can improve patient, health service and quality of care outcomes. The aim of this cross-sectional survey, administered to all hospitals caring for patients with acute hip fracture, in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, was to establish current models of care (e.g. shared care or other), and barriers and facilitators of best care.

Methods: A combination of quantitative and free-text data was collected. In total, 30/36 (83%) hospitals responded, with representation from all 15 state local health districts.

Results: Overall, 21/30 had a formal orthopedic surgery/geriatric medicine shared care model; orthopaedic surgery admission with routine (ortho)geriatrician input was commonest (13/21). Multiple barriers to optimal hip fracture care were identified along the various stages of the national guideline-recommended care pathway. Common barriers reported included staffing deficits (for pain assessment, fascia iliaca block administration) and gaps in service structure (lack of specialist services for refracture prevention). Multidisciplinary meetings were in place to enable best care and to promote team communication, but were impeded by absence of relevant team members (8/16). Free-text themes of enablers of good practice included clear escalation and hand-over processes, multidisciplinary communication strategies, and guideline-aligned clinical pathways.

Conclusion: Moving forward, addressing common barriers such as staffing and knowledge deficits, and harnessing enablers of good practice such as multidisciplinary communication and support, combined with effective implementation strategies, are likely to optimize care for patients with hip fracture.

髋部骨折患者目前的护理和最佳护理障碍:澳大利亚新南威尔士州医院的调查。
背景:脆性髋部骨折是一种常见且往往具有破坏性的事件,骨科和老年医学之间的共享护理方法可以改善患者、卫生服务和护理结果的质量。这项横断面调查在澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)所有治疗急性髋部骨折患者的医院进行,目的是建立当前的护理模式(例如,共享护理或其他),以及最佳护理的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用定量资料和自由文本资料相结合的方法。总共有30/36(83%)家医院作出了答复,这些医院代表来自所有15个州地方卫生区。结果:总体而言,21/30的患者有正式的骨科/老年医学共享护理模式;常规(骨科)老年病专家输入的骨科手术住院最常见(13/21)。在国家指南推荐的护理路径的不同阶段,确定了最佳髋部骨折护理的多重障碍。常见的障碍包括人员短缺(疼痛评估、髂筋膜阻滞管理)和服务结构的差距(缺乏预防再骨折的专业服务)。多学科会议的召开是为了提供最好的照顾和促进团队沟通,但由于相关团队成员的缺席而受到阻碍(8/16)。促进良好实践的自由文本主题包括明确的升级和移交过程、多学科沟通策略和与指南一致的临床途径。结论:向前迈进,解决人员配备和知识不足等常见障碍,利用多学科沟通和支持等良好实践的推动因素,结合有效的实施策略,有可能优化髋部骨折患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信