Comparison and Optimization of DNA Extraction Methods for Human DNA from Dried Blood Spot Samples.

IF 1.4 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Natalja Van Biesen, Piet Cools, Eline Meyers
{"title":"Comparison and Optimization of DNA Extraction Methods for Human DNA from Dried Blood Spot Samples.","authors":"Natalja Van Biesen, Piet Cools, Eline Meyers","doi":"10.3390/pediatric17020030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>DNA extraction from dried blood spot (DBS) samples is often applied in neonatal screening programs. Although various methods to extract DNA from DBSs have been described, the optimal approach remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and optimize extraction methods to establish a reliable and efficient protocol for human DNA extraction from DBSs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a back-to-back comparison of five different DNA extraction methods on 20 DBS samples: three column-based kits (QIAamp DNA mini kit, High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit, DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit) and two in-house boiling methods (one using TE buffer, one using Chelex-100 resin). DNA recovery was measured with DeNovix DS-11 and <i>ACTB</i> qPCR. Further optimization of elution volumes and starting material was performed on the best-performing methods (sample size = 5). Additionally, T-cell receptor excision circle (TREC) DNA was assessed by qPCR as an application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chelex boiling method yielded significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) higher <i>ACTB</i> DNA concentrations compared to the other methods. Column-based methods showed low DNA recovery, except for Roche, which showed significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) higher DNA concentrations than the other column-based methods, as measured by DeNovix DS-11. Decreasing elution volumes (150 vs. 100 vs. 50 µL) increased <i>ACTB</i> DNA concentrations significantly, while increasing starting material (two vs. one 6 mm spot) did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified an easy and cost-effective optimized DNA extraction method using Chelex from DBSs, with an elution volume of 50 µL and 1 × 6 mm DBS punch, which is particularly advantageous for research in low-resource settings and large populations, such as neonatal screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45251,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Reports","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric17020030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: DNA extraction from dried blood spot (DBS) samples is often applied in neonatal screening programs. Although various methods to extract DNA from DBSs have been described, the optimal approach remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and optimize extraction methods to establish a reliable and efficient protocol for human DNA extraction from DBSs.

Methods: We conducted a back-to-back comparison of five different DNA extraction methods on 20 DBS samples: three column-based kits (QIAamp DNA mini kit, High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit, DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit) and two in-house boiling methods (one using TE buffer, one using Chelex-100 resin). DNA recovery was measured with DeNovix DS-11 and ACTB qPCR. Further optimization of elution volumes and starting material was performed on the best-performing methods (sample size = 5). Additionally, T-cell receptor excision circle (TREC) DNA was assessed by qPCR as an application.

Results: The Chelex boiling method yielded significantly (p < 0.0001) higher ACTB DNA concentrations compared to the other methods. Column-based methods showed low DNA recovery, except for Roche, which showed significantly (p < 0.0001) higher DNA concentrations than the other column-based methods, as measured by DeNovix DS-11. Decreasing elution volumes (150 vs. 100 vs. 50 µL) increased ACTB DNA concentrations significantly, while increasing starting material (two vs. one 6 mm spot) did not.

Conclusions: We identified an easy and cost-effective optimized DNA extraction method using Chelex from DBSs, with an elution volume of 50 µL and 1 × 6 mm DBS punch, which is particularly advantageous for research in low-resource settings and large populations, such as neonatal screening programs.

人干血斑DNA提取方法的比较与优化。
背景/目的:从干血斑(DBS)样本中提取DNA通常用于新生儿筛查项目。虽然从DBSs中提取DNA的方法多种多样,但最佳方法尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在比较和优化提取方法,建立一种可靠、高效的提取DBSs人DNA的方案。方法:对20份DBS样品进行5种不同的DNA提取方法:3种柱式试剂盒(QIAamp DNA mini试剂盒、High Pure PCR Template Preparation试剂盒、dnasy Blood & Tissue试剂盒)和2种内部煮沸方法(TE缓冲液和Chelex-100树脂)。采用DeNovix DS-11和ACTB qPCR检测DNA恢复。对效果最好的方法(样本量= 5)进行进一步优化洗脱体积和起始材料。此外,通过qPCR评估t细胞受体切除环(TREC) DNA作为应用。结果:Chelex煮沸法获得的ACTB DNA浓度显著高于其他方法(p < 0.0001)。通过DeNovix DS-11检测,柱式方法的DNA回收率较低,但Roche除外,其DNA浓度显著(p < 0.0001)高于其他柱式方法。减少洗脱体积(150µL vs 100µL vs 50µL)可显著提高ACTB DNA浓度,而增加起始材料(两个vs一个6 mm斑点)则无此作用。结论:我们确定了一种简单且具有成本效益的DNA提取方法,使用Chelex从DBS中提取DNA,洗脱量为50µL, 1 × 6 mm DBS冲孔,特别有利于在低资源环境和大人群中进行研究,例如新生儿筛查项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Reports
Pediatric Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信