Integrating ChatGPT as a Tool in Pharmacy Practice: A Cross-Sectional Exploration Among Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia.

IF 2.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IPRP.S500689
Abdulrahman Alghitran, Hind M AlOsaimi, Ahmad Albuluwi, Emad Omar Almalki, Abdullah Zohair Aldowayan, Rakan Alharthi, Jawad Mohammed Qattan, Fahd Alghamdi, Mohammed AlHalabi, Nawaf Ayed Almalki, Abdulaziz Alharthi, Asma Alshammari, Muhammad Kanan
{"title":"Integrating ChatGPT as a Tool in Pharmacy Practice: A Cross-Sectional Exploration Among Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Abdulrahman Alghitran, Hind M AlOsaimi, Ahmad Albuluwi, Emad Omar Almalki, Abdullah Zohair Aldowayan, Rakan Alharthi, Jawad Mohammed Qattan, Fahd Alghamdi, Mohammed AlHalabi, Nawaf Ayed Almalki, Abdulaziz Alharthi, Asma Alshammari, Muhammad Kanan","doi":"10.2147/IPRP.S500689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially ChatGPT, is rapidly assimilating into healthcare, providing significant advantages in pharmacy practice, such as improved clinical decision-making, patient counselling, and drug information management. The adoption of AI tools is heavily contingent upon pharmacy practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). This study sought to evaluate the knowledge and practices of pharmacists in Saudi Arabia concerning the utilization of ChatGPT in their daily activities.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed from May 2023 to July 2024 including pharmacists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. An online pre-validated KAP questionnaire was disseminated, collecting data on demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices about ChatGPT. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were conducted using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1022 respondents, 78.7% were familiar with AI in pharmacy, while 90.1% correctly identified ChatGPT as an advanced AI chatbot. Positive attitudes towards ChatGPT were reported by 64.1% of pharmacists, although only 24.3% used AI tools regularly. Significant predictors of positive attitudes and practices included academic/research roles (β=0.7, p=0.005) and 6-10 years of experience (β=0.9, p=0.05). Ethical concerns were raised by 64% of respondents, and 92% reported a lack of formal training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the majority of pharmacists held positive attitudes toward ChatGPT, practical implementation remains limited due to ethical concerns and inadequate training. Addressing these barriers is essential for successful AI integration in pharmacy, supporting Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 initiative.</p>","PeriodicalId":45655,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","volume":"14 ","pages":"31-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S500689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially ChatGPT, is rapidly assimilating into healthcare, providing significant advantages in pharmacy practice, such as improved clinical decision-making, patient counselling, and drug information management. The adoption of AI tools is heavily contingent upon pharmacy practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). This study sought to evaluate the knowledge and practices of pharmacists in Saudi Arabia concerning the utilization of ChatGPT in their daily activities.

Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study was performed from May 2023 to July 2024 including pharmacists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. An online pre-validated KAP questionnaire was disseminated, collecting data on demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices about ChatGPT. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were conducted using SPSS.

Results: Of 1022 respondents, 78.7% were familiar with AI in pharmacy, while 90.1% correctly identified ChatGPT as an advanced AI chatbot. Positive attitudes towards ChatGPT were reported by 64.1% of pharmacists, although only 24.3% used AI tools regularly. Significant predictors of positive attitudes and practices included academic/research roles (β=0.7, p=0.005) and 6-10 years of experience (β=0.9, p=0.05). Ethical concerns were raised by 64% of respondents, and 92% reported a lack of formal training.

Conclusion: While the majority of pharmacists held positive attitudes toward ChatGPT, practical implementation remains limited due to ethical concerns and inadequate training. Addressing these barriers is essential for successful AI integration in pharmacy, supporting Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 initiative.

将ChatGPT作为药学实践的工具:沙特阿拉伯药剂师的横断面探索。
目的:人工智能(AI),尤其是ChatGPT,正在迅速融入医疗保健领域,为药学实践提供了显著的优势,如改进临床决策、患者咨询和药物信息管理。人工智能工具的采用在很大程度上取决于药房从业人员的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯药剂师在日常活动中使用ChatGPT的知识和实践。患者和方法:从2023年5月到2024年7月,在沙特阿拉伯利雅得进行了一项横断面研究,包括药剂师。分发了一份在线预验证的KAP问卷,收集了关于ChatGPT的人口统计、知识、态度和实践方面的数据。采用SPSS进行描述性统计和回归分析。结果:在1022名受访者中,78.7%的人熟悉AI在药房的应用,90.1%的人正确识别出ChatGPT是一款先进的AI聊天机器人。64.1%的药剂师对ChatGPT持积极态度,尽管只有24.3%的药剂师定期使用人工智能工具。积极态度和行为的显著预测因子包括学术/研究角色(β=0.7, p=0.005)和6-10年的工作经验(β=0.9, p=0.05)。64%的受访者提出了道德问题,92%的受访者表示缺乏正式培训。结论:虽然大多数药师对ChatGPT持积极态度,但由于伦理问题和培训不足,实际实施仍然有限。解决这些障碍对于人工智能在制药领域的成功整合至关重要,这将支持沙特阿拉伯的2030年愿景倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信