Ivermectin as a Treatment Modality in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Up-To-Date RCTs.

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of Ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 disease. Literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and google scholar. Clinical trial registries (clinical trail.gov) and preprint servers (Medrxiv) were also searched for registered and preprint data respectively. Mortality, Clinical recovery, Clinical worsening, duration of hospital stay, and adverse events were considered as primary outcomes while viral clearance is considered as a secondary outcome. Revised Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Random effect meta-analysis was carried out for all the outcomes. GRADE was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A total of 19 RCTs with 1111 patients were included in the analysis. Ivermectin use did was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of mortality, duration of hospitalization, clinical worsening, and incidence of adverse events nor it was associated with an increase in clinical improvement compared to either placebo or standard of care. Ivermectin also did not show any reduction in viral clearance compared to both placebo or standard of care and this was associated with substantial inconsistency. The overall certainty of the evidence was very low to low. Based on the very low to low certainty of the evidence, we consider Ivermectin ineffective in the management of COVID-19 disease, both as treatment and prophylaxis.