Exploring Change Mechanisms in a Complex Intervention: Lessons Learned From a Longitudinal Constructivist Grounded Theory Study.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Global Qualitative Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333936251327360
Stephanie Kipfer, Cedric Mabire, Andrea Koppitz, Sandrine Pihet
{"title":"Exploring Change Mechanisms in a Complex Intervention: Lessons Learned From a Longitudinal Constructivist Grounded Theory Study.","authors":"Stephanie Kipfer, Cedric Mabire, Andrea Koppitz, Sandrine Pihet","doi":"10.1177/23333936251327360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To develop effective and implementable complex health interventions, we need to understand the mechanisms through which an intervention contributes to desired outcomes. This article provides a practical example of how nursing and other health researchers can qualitatively explore change mechanisms of complex interventions with a longitudinal constructivist grounded theory approach. It shares and discusses lessons learned when applying this approach to explore change mechanisms in the context of a psychoeducational intervention for family dementia caregivers. Important lessons learned included: (1) By comparing data from different time points, changes could be identified even when not explicitly mentioned by participants. (2) Participants exhibited more awareness of changes and related mechanisms in interviews conducted during the intervention compared to those executed after, where they had already integrated the new strategies into their daily lives. (3) Analyses conducted within and across participants for each time point and across all time points revealed time-specific mechanisms, shared patterns and journeys substantially differing from others. (4) Including participants' quantitative intervention outcomes as additional data in the qualitative analysis helped identify facilitators and barriers to change. In conclusion, our approach produced in-depth knowledge about the intervention's change mechanisms by considering the complexity and temporal dimensions of participants' experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":45940,"journal":{"name":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"23333936251327360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936251327360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To develop effective and implementable complex health interventions, we need to understand the mechanisms through which an intervention contributes to desired outcomes. This article provides a practical example of how nursing and other health researchers can qualitatively explore change mechanisms of complex interventions with a longitudinal constructivist grounded theory approach. It shares and discusses lessons learned when applying this approach to explore change mechanisms in the context of a psychoeducational intervention for family dementia caregivers. Important lessons learned included: (1) By comparing data from different time points, changes could be identified even when not explicitly mentioned by participants. (2) Participants exhibited more awareness of changes and related mechanisms in interviews conducted during the intervention compared to those executed after, where they had already integrated the new strategies into their daily lives. (3) Analyses conducted within and across participants for each time point and across all time points revealed time-specific mechanisms, shared patterns and journeys substantially differing from others. (4) Including participants' quantitative intervention outcomes as additional data in the qualitative analysis helped identify facilitators and barriers to change. In conclusion, our approach produced in-depth knowledge about the intervention's change mechanisms by considering the complexity and temporal dimensions of participants' experiences.

探索复杂干预措施的变革机制:从纵向建构主义基础理论研究中汲取的经验教训。
为了制定有效和可执行的复杂卫生干预措施,我们需要了解干预措施有助于产生预期结果的机制。这篇文章提供了一个实际的例子,护理和其他健康研究人员如何用纵向建构主义的理论方法定性地探索复杂干预措施的变化机制。它分享并讨论了在应用这种方法探索家庭痴呆症护理人员心理教育干预背景下的变化机制时所获得的经验教训。重要的经验教训包括:(1)通过比较不同时间点的数据,即使参与者没有明确提到变化,也可以识别变化。(2)与已将新策略融入日常生活的参与者相比,在干预期间进行的访谈中,参与者表现出更多的变化意识和相关机制。(3)在每个时间点和所有时间点的参与者内部和参与者之间进行的分析揭示了与其他时间点截然不同的特定时间机制、共享模式和旅程。(4)将参与者的定量干预结果作为定性分析的附加数据,有助于识别变革的促进因素和障碍。总之,我们的方法通过考虑参与者经历的复杂性和时间维度,对干预的变化机制产生了深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Qualitative Nursing Research (GQNR) is a ground breaking, international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on qualitative research in fields relevant to nursing and other health professionals world-wide. The journal specializes in topics related to nursing practice, responses to health and illness, health promotion, and health care delivery. GQNR will publish research articles using qualitative methods and qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs as well as meta-syntheses and articles focused on methodological development. Special sections include Ethics, Methodological Development, Advancing Theory/Metasynthesis, Establishing Evidence, and Application to Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信