Newly Graduated Nurses' Experiences Regarding Job Readiness and Their Development of Professional Authority: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251330041
Heidi Jerpseth, Kari Toverud Jensen
{"title":"Newly Graduated Nurses' Experiences Regarding Job Readiness and Their Development of Professional Authority: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Heidi Jerpseth, Kari Toverud Jensen","doi":"10.1177/23779608251330041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization has identified a shortfall of nurses. There is a risk that newly graduated nurses will leave the profession only a few years after completing their education. Little is known regarding the newly graduated nurses' experiences of practical readiness and development of professional authority during their first year of working.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore newly graduated nurses' experiences related to their practical readiness and their development of professional authority.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative design. Data was collected from March to April in 2022. The data consist of eight individual interviews with nurses who had been working for almost one year. The data was analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two themes were constructed: Ready or not, and being responsible with or without decision-making authority. The experience of preparedness was related to handling clinical judgement, clinical skills and nursing knowledge. The participants found their role in interdisciplinary cooperation challenging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nurses who felt prepared exhibited competence that integrated their personal abilities with clinical judgment, allowing them to apply their skills and knowledge across diverse situations. The participants revealed a discrepancy between perceived responsibility and the level of professional authority that resulted in frustration and a sense of being professionally overshadowed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251330041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251330041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization has identified a shortfall of nurses. There is a risk that newly graduated nurses will leave the profession only a few years after completing their education. Little is known regarding the newly graduated nurses' experiences of practical readiness and development of professional authority during their first year of working.

Objectives: To explore newly graduated nurses' experiences related to their practical readiness and their development of professional authority.

Methods: Qualitative design. Data was collected from March to April in 2022. The data consist of eight individual interviews with nurses who had been working for almost one year. The data was analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Two themes were constructed: Ready or not, and being responsible with or without decision-making authority. The experience of preparedness was related to handling clinical judgement, clinical skills and nursing knowledge. The participants found their role in interdisciplinary cooperation challenging.

Conclusion: The nurses who felt prepared exhibited competence that integrated their personal abilities with clinical judgment, allowing them to apply their skills and knowledge across diverse situations. The participants revealed a discrepancy between perceived responsibility and the level of professional authority that resulted in frustration and a sense of being professionally overshadowed.

新毕业护士职业准备与专业权威发展的质性研究。
导言:世界卫生组织已确定护士短缺。有一种风险是,刚毕业的护士在完成学业几年后就离开了这个行业。对于新毕业的护士在第一年工作期间的实际准备和专业权威发展的经验,人们知之甚少。目的:探讨新毕业护士在实践准备和专业权威发展方面的经验。方法:定性设计。数据收集于2022年3月至4月。数据包括对工作近一年的8名护士的个人访谈。使用Braun和Clarke的反身性主题分析来分析数据。结果:构建了准备与不准备、有决策权与无决策权负责两个主题。准备经验与处理临床判断、临床技能和护理知识有关。参与者发现他们在跨学科合作中的角色具有挑战性。结论:做好准备的护士表现出将个人能力与临床判断相结合的能力,使他们能够在不同的情况下应用他们的技能和知识。参与者表示,他们认为自己的责任与专业权威水平之间存在差异,这导致了挫折感和被专业人士掩盖的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信