Talking about desire to die: Talking past each other? A framework analysis of interview triads with patients, informal caregivers, and health professionals.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kathleen Boström, Thomas Dojan, Thessa Thölking, Leonie Gehrke, Carolin Rosendahl, Raymond Voltz, Kerstin Kremeike
{"title":"Talking about desire to die: Talking past each other? A framework analysis of interview triads with patients, informal caregivers, and health professionals.","authors":"Kathleen Boström, Thomas Dojan, Thessa Thölking, Leonie Gehrke, Carolin Rosendahl, Raymond Voltz, Kerstin Kremeike","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524002104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Up to 40% of seriously ill patients develop a (temporary) desire to die which can lead to requests for assisted dying. Health professionals often feel uncertain about addressing these topics, while informal caregivers may feel guilty and left out. Open and respectful communication proves beneficial. It remains unclear how this communication ideal realizes within the lived experience of all 3 parties. Therefore, we conducted in-depth analysis of communication strategies about desire to die from triangulated perspectives of patients, informal caregivers, and health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with purposefully sampled triads consisting of seriously ill patients, their respective informal caregivers and health professionals. Interviews were part of the qualitative evaluation of a 3-phase mixed-methods study on the effects of communication about desire to die on seriously ill patients. We followed a framework analysis approach to build communication types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the <i>N</i> = 13 patients, 54% suffered from oncological diseases. Health professionals (<i>N</i> = 13) were multiprofessional. Informal caregivers (<i>N</i> = 13) were partners, children, or another relation. All in all, we conducted <i>N</i> = 14 interview triads (<i>n</i> = 3 incomplete; <i>N</i> = 39 individual interviews).Four key themes emerged from analysis: (a) how open communication was perceived, (b) whether participants reported shared reality, (c) how they talked about death, and (d) their communication strategies.Ultimately, 3 communication types were inductively derived at from these key themes. Type 1 \"Between the Lines,\" type 2 \"Past each Other\" and type 3 \"Matter of Fact\" show differing expressions on the key themes, especially on (b) shared reality. Specific type characteristics produce suggestions for health professionals' communicative practice.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Awareness of typical communication strategies is necessary to foresee potential pitfalls such as loss of information or acting on unchecked assumptions. To reduce distress and increase information flow, health professionals should actively approach informal caregivers for desire to die conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524002104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Up to 40% of seriously ill patients develop a (temporary) desire to die which can lead to requests for assisted dying. Health professionals often feel uncertain about addressing these topics, while informal caregivers may feel guilty and left out. Open and respectful communication proves beneficial. It remains unclear how this communication ideal realizes within the lived experience of all 3 parties. Therefore, we conducted in-depth analysis of communication strategies about desire to die from triangulated perspectives of patients, informal caregivers, and health professionals.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with purposefully sampled triads consisting of seriously ill patients, their respective informal caregivers and health professionals. Interviews were part of the qualitative evaluation of a 3-phase mixed-methods study on the effects of communication about desire to die on seriously ill patients. We followed a framework analysis approach to build communication types.

Results: From the N = 13 patients, 54% suffered from oncological diseases. Health professionals (N = 13) were multiprofessional. Informal caregivers (N = 13) were partners, children, or another relation. All in all, we conducted N = 14 interview triads (n = 3 incomplete; N = 39 individual interviews).Four key themes emerged from analysis: (a) how open communication was perceived, (b) whether participants reported shared reality, (c) how they talked about death, and (d) their communication strategies.Ultimately, 3 communication types were inductively derived at from these key themes. Type 1 "Between the Lines," type 2 "Past each Other" and type 3 "Matter of Fact" show differing expressions on the key themes, especially on (b) shared reality. Specific type characteristics produce suggestions for health professionals' communicative practice.

Significance of results: Awareness of typical communication strategies is necessary to foresee potential pitfalls such as loss of information or acting on unchecked assumptions. To reduce distress and increase information flow, health professionals should actively approach informal caregivers for desire to die conversations.

谈论对死亡的渴望:各执一词?病人、非正式照护者和卫生专业人员访谈三位一体的框架分析。
目的:高达40%的重病患者会产生一种(暂时的)死亡欲望,这可能导致请求协助死亡。卫生专业人员经常对解决这些问题感到不确定,而非正式护理人员可能感到内疚和被忽视。事实证明,开放和尊重的沟通是有益的。目前尚不清楚这种沟通理想如何在所有三方的生活经验中实现。因此,我们从患者、非正式护理人员和卫生专业人员的三角角度对死亡愿望的沟通策略进行了深入分析。方法:我们进行了半结构化访谈,有目的地抽样了由重症患者、他们各自的非正式护理人员和卫生专业人员组成的三合会。访谈是一项三阶段混合方法研究的定性评估的一部分,该研究旨在研究关于死亡愿望的沟通对重病患者的影响。我们遵循框架分析方法来构建通信类型。结果:13例患者中,54%的患者有肿瘤病变。卫生专业人员(N = 13)为多专业人员。非正式照顾者(N = 13)是伴侣、孩子或其他亲属。总的来说,我们进行了N = 14个访谈三位一体(N = 3个不完整;N = 39个个体访谈)。分析产生了四个关键主题:(a)如何看待开放的沟通,(b)参与者是否报告了共同的现实,(c)他们如何谈论死亡,以及(d)他们的沟通策略。最终,从这些关键主题归纳出3种交流类型。类型1“字里行间”,类型2“彼此过去”和类型3“事实”在关键主题上表现出不同的表达,特别是在(b)共同的现实。特定的类型特征为卫生专业人员的交际实践提供了建议。结果的重要性:了解典型的沟通策略是必要的,以预见潜在的陷阱,如信息丢失或未经检查的假设行事。为了减少痛苦和增加信息流,卫生专业人员应该积极接近非正式护理人员,进行渴望死亡的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信