Running stiffness and spatiotemporal parameters are similar between non-runners and runners with different experience levels.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Rodrigo Rabello, Gauri A Desai, Chiarella Sforza, Allison H Gruber
{"title":"Running stiffness and spatiotemporal parameters are similar between non-runners and runners with different experience levels.","authors":"Rodrigo Rabello, Gauri A Desai, Chiarella Sforza, Allison H Gruber","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2025.2480094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spatiotemporal parameters and leg and joint stiffness are variables that represent the fundamental dynamics of running. Therefore, these variables may effectively differentiate between less-experienced and more-experienced runners' gait, possibly addressing differing injury rates between populations. We compared stiffness and spatiotemporal parameters between runners with different experience levels, including a group with no previous running experience. Healthy physically active participants (22.1 ± 3.6y) were divided into three groups, according to experience: experienced (running >1-year, 14-48 km/week; <i>n</i> = 23, 9F), novice (running <1-year, 5-21 km/week; <i>n</i> = 15, 4F) and non-runners (no running for the past 5 years; <i>n</i> = 17, 7F). Three-dimensional motion capture and force plates measured gait mechanics during overground running at 3.35 m·s<sup>-1</sup>. Knee, ankle and three-dimensional leg stiffness, contact time, flight time and step length were compared between groups using independent-measures ANCOVA (covariate = sex). No biomechanical variable was significantly different between the groups (leg: <i>p</i> = 0.652, Hedges' g = 0.09-0.17; ankle: <i>p</i> = 0.439, g = 0.07-0.19; knee: <i>p</i> = 0.153, g = 0.13-0.29; contact time: <i>p</i> = 0.592, g = 0.06-0.24; flight time: <i>p</i> = 0.513, g = 0.03-0.40; step length: <i>p</i> = 0.107, g = 0.26-0.61). Stiffness and spatiotemporal parameters were not different between runners with greater than 1-year of experience when compared to runners with less than 1-year experience and non-runners. Therefore, running gait may not differentially affect injury rates between experience levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2480094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatiotemporal parameters and leg and joint stiffness are variables that represent the fundamental dynamics of running. Therefore, these variables may effectively differentiate between less-experienced and more-experienced runners' gait, possibly addressing differing injury rates between populations. We compared stiffness and spatiotemporal parameters between runners with different experience levels, including a group with no previous running experience. Healthy physically active participants (22.1 ± 3.6y) were divided into three groups, according to experience: experienced (running >1-year, 14-48 km/week; n = 23, 9F), novice (running <1-year, 5-21 km/week; n = 15, 4F) and non-runners (no running for the past 5 years; n = 17, 7F). Three-dimensional motion capture and force plates measured gait mechanics during overground running at 3.35 m·s-1. Knee, ankle and three-dimensional leg stiffness, contact time, flight time and step length were compared between groups using independent-measures ANCOVA (covariate = sex). No biomechanical variable was significantly different between the groups (leg: p = 0.652, Hedges' g = 0.09-0.17; ankle: p = 0.439, g = 0.07-0.19; knee: p = 0.153, g = 0.13-0.29; contact time: p = 0.592, g = 0.06-0.24; flight time: p = 0.513, g = 0.03-0.40; step length: p = 0.107, g = 0.26-0.61). Stiffness and spatiotemporal parameters were not different between runners with greater than 1-year of experience when compared to runners with less than 1-year experience and non-runners. Therefore, running gait may not differentially affect injury rates between experience levels.

不同经验水平的跑步者和非跑步者的跑步刚度和时空参数相似。
时空参数和腿部和关节刚度是代表跑步基本动态的变量。因此,这些变量可以有效地区分经验不足和经验丰富的跑步者的步态,可能解决人群之间不同的受伤率。我们比较了不同经验水平的跑步者的僵硬度和时空参数,包括一组没有跑步经验的人。健康体力活动者(22.1±3.6岁)按经验分为三组:经验丰富者(跑步1年,14-48公里/周;n = 23,9f),新手(跑步者n = 15,4f)和非跑步者(过去5年没有跑步;n = 17,7f)。三维运动捕捉和力板测量了3.35 m·s-1地上跑步时的步态力学。采用独立测量ANCOVA(协变量=性别)比较两组间膝关节、踝关节和三维腿部僵硬度、接触时间、飞行时间和步长。各组间生物力学指标无显著差异(腿:p = 0.652, Hedges' g = 0.09-0.17;踝关节:p = 0.439, g = 0.07-0.19;膝关节:p = 0.153, g = 0.13-0.29;接触时间:p = 0.592, g = 0.06-0.24;飞行时间:p = 0.513, g = 0.03-0.40;步长:p = 0.107, g = 0.26-0.61)。与经验不足1年的跑步者和非跑步者相比,经验超过1年的跑步者的僵硬度和时空参数没有差异。因此,跑步步态可能不会影响不同经验水平的受伤率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Biomechanics
Sports Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic). Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly. Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信