Laurie E Davies, David R Sinclair, Christopher Todd, Barbara Hanratty, Fiona E Matthews, Andrew Kingston
{"title":"Area-level socioeconomic inequalities in activities of daily living disability-free life expectancy in England: a modelling study.","authors":"Laurie E Davies, David R Sinclair, Christopher Todd, Barbara Hanratty, Fiona E Matthews, Andrew Kingston","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More evidence of socioeconomic inequalities in disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) is needed to help develop approaches to narrow the gap between the most and least socioeconomically deprived people. Activities of daily living (ADL) disability represents the most severe and expensive disablement stage. Using combined longitudinal data, we aimed to quantify area-level socioeconomic inequalities in ADL-DFLE and the total person-years lived with ADL disability, in older men and women in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this modelling study, we harmonised data on ADL disability, area deprivation, age, and self-reported gender for individuals aged 50 years or older from three longitudinal studies in England: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n=11 337), the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study II (n=7469), and the Newcastle 85+ Study (n=847). We used multistate modelling, and calculated the remaining life expectancy with and without ADL disability by gender and area-level socioeconomic status (<20%, 20-80%, and >80% of Index of Multiple Deprivation). From these data and Office for National Statistics population figures for the year 2024, we estimated the extra person-years lived with ADL disability by those aged 65 years from the most socioeconomically deprived areas.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Those living in the least deprived areas had a reduced risk of ADL disability compared with those in the most deprived areas (hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·55-0·69]; p<0·0001), as did those in the middle area-level socioeconomic group (HR 0·76 [0·69-0·84]; p<0·0001). Increasing area-level socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with reduced life expectancy and more time spent with ADL disability, particularly for women. Living in the most disadvantaged areas was associated with people having ADL disability 11·0 years earlier for men and 12·0 years earlier for women, compared with living in the least deprived areas. An extra 59 000 person-years for men and 88 000 person-years for women were lived with ADL disability by those in the most deprived areas, at the population level, compared with the least deprived areas.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Targeted policies to address underlying socioeconomic inequalities in health are likely to be the long-term definitive solution.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing.</p>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":" ","pages":"100700"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: More evidence of socioeconomic inequalities in disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) is needed to help develop approaches to narrow the gap between the most and least socioeconomically deprived people. Activities of daily living (ADL) disability represents the most severe and expensive disablement stage. Using combined longitudinal data, we aimed to quantify area-level socioeconomic inequalities in ADL-DFLE and the total person-years lived with ADL disability, in older men and women in England.
Methods: In this modelling study, we harmonised data on ADL disability, area deprivation, age, and self-reported gender for individuals aged 50 years or older from three longitudinal studies in England: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n=11 337), the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study II (n=7469), and the Newcastle 85+ Study (n=847). We used multistate modelling, and calculated the remaining life expectancy with and without ADL disability by gender and area-level socioeconomic status (<20%, 20-80%, and >80% of Index of Multiple Deprivation). From these data and Office for National Statistics population figures for the year 2024, we estimated the extra person-years lived with ADL disability by those aged 65 years from the most socioeconomically deprived areas.
Findings: Those living in the least deprived areas had a reduced risk of ADL disability compared with those in the most deprived areas (hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·55-0·69]; p<0·0001), as did those in the middle area-level socioeconomic group (HR 0·76 [0·69-0·84]; p<0·0001). Increasing area-level socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with reduced life expectancy and more time spent with ADL disability, particularly for women. Living in the most disadvantaged areas was associated with people having ADL disability 11·0 years earlier for men and 12·0 years earlier for women, compared with living in the least deprived areas. An extra 59 000 person-years for men and 88 000 person-years for women were lived with ADL disability by those in the most deprived areas, at the population level, compared with the least deprived areas.
Interpretation: Targeted policies to address underlying socioeconomic inequalities in health are likely to be the long-term definitive solution.
Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing.
期刊介绍：
The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
