Nasser M Meazher, Haider Nadum Obaid, Osama Abdul-Razaq Twayej, Fadhil Abbas Al-Janabi, Samer Makki Mohamed Al Hakkak, Alaa Abood Al Wadees
{"title":"Modified radical mastectomy under local anesthesia using Tumescent Technique experience of Teaching Hospitals in Iraq.","authors":"Nasser M Meazher, Haider Nadum Obaid, Osama Abdul-Razaq Twayej, Fadhil Abbas Al-Janabi, Samer Makki Mohamed Al Hakkak, Alaa Abood Al Wadees","doi":"10.36740/WLek/197197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: To evaluate the advantages, disadvantages, safety, and restrictions of local anaesthetic against general anesthesia for mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, which was carried out at Al-Sader teaching hospital from October 2020 to September 2023, 25 patients (LA group) with a mean age of 64.0±6.3 years (range 55-76 years) underwent a unilateral total mastectomy for breast cancer under local anesthesia using tumescent technique (by manual infiltration technique), and an additional 25 patients (GA group) as a control group with a mean age of 64.9±6.9 years (range 55-75 years) underwent a unilateral mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: With use of light sedation for 6 patients, anesthetic is sufficient for all 25 patients. The amount of blood loss intraoperatively measured by number of gauze used during the procedure, approximately 3 gauze, 20 cc of blood for each gauze was significantly lower in LA group than GA group, 2.7±0.4, 5.4±0.4 gauze respectively P<0.001. More than 8 hours after surgery, patients are pain-free. No postoperative complications like necrosis of skin flap, wound infection, or hematoma, when compared to GA group, surgery took substantially longer in LA group 48.9±14.3 minutes than in GA group 38.2±2.9 minutes; P<0.001. The day after the surgery, the patient was discharged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: The use of tumescent anesthesia (which is safe and effective) is an attractive alternative method for general anesthesia in properly selected candidates (class IV according to American society of anesthesia).</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"78 2","pages":"311-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/197197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Aim: To evaluate the advantages, disadvantages, safety, and restrictions of local anaesthetic against general anesthesia for mastectomy.
Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, which was carried out at Al-Sader teaching hospital from October 2020 to September 2023, 25 patients (LA group) with a mean age of 64.0±6.3 years (range 55-76 years) underwent a unilateral total mastectomy for breast cancer under local anesthesia using tumescent technique (by manual infiltration technique), and an additional 25 patients (GA group) as a control group with a mean age of 64.9±6.9 years (range 55-75 years) underwent a unilateral mastectomy.
Results: Results: With use of light sedation for 6 patients, anesthetic is sufficient for all 25 patients. The amount of blood loss intraoperatively measured by number of gauze used during the procedure, approximately 3 gauze, 20 cc of blood for each gauze was significantly lower in LA group than GA group, 2.7±0.4, 5.4±0.4 gauze respectively P<0.001. More than 8 hours after surgery, patients are pain-free. No postoperative complications like necrosis of skin flap, wound infection, or hematoma, when compared to GA group, surgery took substantially longer in LA group 48.9±14.3 minutes than in GA group 38.2±2.9 minutes; P<0.001. The day after the surgery, the patient was discharged.
Conclusion: Conclusions: The use of tumescent anesthesia (which is safe and effective) is an attractive alternative method for general anesthesia in properly selected candidates (class IV according to American society of anesthesia).