Legal principles of using special medical and psychiatric knowledge in criminal proceedings: Ukrainian context and international standards.

Q4 Medicine
Olena Makarova, Mykola Kolomoitsev, Ivan Iemets, Ivan Yatsenko, Iryna Shynkarenko
{"title":"Legal principles of using special medical and psychiatric knowledge in criminal proceedings: Ukrainian context and international standards.","authors":"Olena Makarova, Mykola Kolomoitsev, Ivan Iemets, Ivan Yatsenko, Iryna Shynkarenko","doi":"10.36740/WLek/197137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: This article aims to determine the standards of interaction of medical professionals, psychiatrists, and psychologists with participants in criminal proceedings during the implementation of various forms of use of special knowledge, as well as update their adherence in medical practice and criminal procedural activities.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: As empirical material, the decision of the ECHR, the practice of the Ukrainian courts, the results of scientific research by scientists, dedicated to the related subject of research, were used. In order to realize the set goal, the authors used a whole complex of general scientific and special methods of cognition, namely: system-structural method, method of generalization, dogmatic method, analysis and synthesis, methods of analysis of quantitative indicators, etc.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: The use of medical and psychiatric knowledge must be carried out in compliance with a number of legal principles. All participants in criminal proceedings are required to comply with them. The main criteria for the use of special knowledge include: the validity of the grounds for the implementation of certain forms, the impartiality and independence of the person entrusted with the examination or other form, the rule of law, the inadmissibility of disclosing the secret of the pre-trial investigation, the right to receive another independent opinion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"78 2","pages":"435-441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/197137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: This article aims to determine the standards of interaction of medical professionals, psychiatrists, and psychologists with participants in criminal proceedings during the implementation of various forms of use of special knowledge, as well as update their adherence in medical practice and criminal procedural activities.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: As empirical material, the decision of the ECHR, the practice of the Ukrainian courts, the results of scientific research by scientists, dedicated to the related subject of research, were used. In order to realize the set goal, the authors used a whole complex of general scientific and special methods of cognition, namely: system-structural method, method of generalization, dogmatic method, analysis and synthesis, methods of analysis of quantitative indicators, etc.

Conclusion: Conclusions: The use of medical and psychiatric knowledge must be carried out in compliance with a number of legal principles. All participants in criminal proceedings are required to comply with them. The main criteria for the use of special knowledge include: the validity of the grounds for the implementation of certain forms, the impartiality and independence of the person entrusted with the examination or other form, the rule of law, the inadmissibility of disclosing the secret of the pre-trial investigation, the right to receive another independent opinion.

在刑事诉讼中使用特殊医学和精神病学知识的法律原则:乌克兰情况和国际标准。
目的:目的:本文旨在确定医疗专业人员、精神科医生和心理学家在实施各种形式的专业知识使用过程中与刑事诉讼参与者互动的标准,并更新他们在医疗实践和刑事诉讼活动中的依从性。患者和方法:材料和方法:作为经验材料,使用了ECHR的决定、乌克兰法院的实践、致力于相关研究主题的科学家的科学研究结果。为了实现既定目标,作者运用了一整套科学的和特殊的认知方法,即:系统结构法、归纳法、教条法、分析综合法、定量指标分析法等。结论:医学和精神病学知识的运用必须遵循若干法律原则。刑事诉讼的所有参与人都必须遵守这些规定。使用专门知识的主要标准包括:实施某些形式的理由的有效性、受托审查人或其他形式的公正性和独立性、法治、披露审前调查秘密的不可接受性、接受另一种独立意见的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信