Efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled, open-labelled, multicenter clinical study.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled, open-labelled, multicenter clinical study.","authors":"Zhen Tong, Zhihong Yang, Baijun Dong, Benkang Shi, Qianyuan Zhuang, Yuanwei Li, Min Gong, Xiaoming Xu, Shengcai Zhou, Xulai Tao, Xinxing Du, Yanhao Dong, Haifeng Wang, Jian Huang, Wei Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation for ablation of benign prostatic hyperplasia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>160 subjects were randomly assigned to the test group to receive ablation and the control group to receive 0.2 mg/day tamsulosin. The maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), prostate volume and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function 5-item (IIEF-5) score were evaluated before treatment and 1, 3, and 12 months after treatment. Differences inter-group and changes intra-group over different follow-up periods were evaluated, and adverse events were recorded. At the same time, patients were divided into three groups according to tertile method of the baseline prostate volume, and the above indicators were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qmax improvement in the test group and control group at 1, 3 and 12 months were 1.22±5.50 mL/s and 1.75±4.29 mL/s, 8.41±8.23 mL/s and 2.61±5.53 mL/s, 7.67±7.63 ml/s and 4.31±6.76 ml/s, respectively. IPSS improvement in the test group at 3 and 12 months were significantly higher than that in the control group, except for 1 month. Similarly, the reduction in prostate volume at 3 months was also observed. The incidences of adverse events were low in both groups. Subgroup analysis showed that there were no statistical differences in key indicators among subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Qmax, prostate volume, IPSS were improved in the test group during 12-month follow-up, and the safety profile was favorable. H-FIRE ablation demonstrated significant efficacy and safety for all patients with large, medium and small prostate volumes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation for ablation of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Materials and methods: 160 subjects were randomly assigned to the test group to receive ablation and the control group to receive 0.2 mg/day tamsulosin. The maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), prostate volume and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function 5-item (IIEF-5) score were evaluated before treatment and 1, 3, and 12 months after treatment. Differences inter-group and changes intra-group over different follow-up periods were evaluated, and adverse events were recorded. At the same time, patients were divided into three groups according to tertile method of the baseline prostate volume, and the above indicators were also analyzed.
Results: Qmax improvement in the test group and control group at 1, 3 and 12 months were 1.22±5.50 mL/s and 1.75±4.29 mL/s, 8.41±8.23 mL/s and 2.61±5.53 mL/s, 7.67±7.63 ml/s and 4.31±6.76 ml/s, respectively. IPSS improvement in the test group at 3 and 12 months were significantly higher than that in the control group, except for 1 month. Similarly, the reduction in prostate volume at 3 months was also observed. The incidences of adverse events were low in both groups. Subgroup analysis showed that there were no statistical differences in key indicators among subgroups.
Conclusions: Qmax, prostate volume, IPSS were improved in the test group during 12-month follow-up, and the safety profile was favorable. H-FIRE ablation demonstrated significant efficacy and safety for all patients with large, medium and small prostate volumes.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.