Establishing and popularizing a standard pathological diagnostic model of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens in China.

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Chun Xu, Ling Chen, An-Ning Feng, Ling Nie, Yao Fu, Lin Li, Wei Li, Qi Sun
{"title":"Establishing and popularizing a standard pathological diagnostic model of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens in China.","authors":"Chun Xu, Ling Chen, An-Ning Feng, Ling Nie, Yao Fu, Lin Li, Wei Li, Qi Sun","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v17.i3.101525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized therapeutic approach for early carcinoma of the digestive tracts. In this regard, the process of histopathological diagnosis requires standardization. However, the uneven development of healthcare in China, especially in eastern and western China, creates challenges for sharing a standardized diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To optimize the process of ESD specimen sampling, embedding and slide production, and to provide complete and accurate pathological reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We established a practical process of specimen sampling, created standardized reporting templates, and trained pathologists from neighboring hospitals and those in the western region. A training effectiveness survey was conducted, and the collected data were assessed by the corresponding percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 valid feedback forms have been received, among which 58% of the participants obtained photographs during specimen collection, whereas the percentage increased to 79% after training. Only 58% and 62% of the respondents ensured the mucosal tissue strips were flat and their order remained unchanged; after training, these two proportions increased to 95% and 92%, respectively. Approximately half the participants measured the depth of the submucosal infiltration, which significantly increased to 95% after training. The percentage of pathologists who did not evaluate lymphovascular invasion effectively reduced. Only 22% of the participants had fixed clinic-pathological meetings before training, which increased to 49% after training. The number of participants who had a thorough understanding of endoscopic diagnosis also significantly increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There have been significant improvements in the process of specimen collection, section quality, and pathology reporting in trained hospitals. Therefore, our study provides valuable insights for others facing similar challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 3","pages":"101525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i3.101525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized therapeutic approach for early carcinoma of the digestive tracts. In this regard, the process of histopathological diagnosis requires standardization. However, the uneven development of healthcare in China, especially in eastern and western China, creates challenges for sharing a standardized diagnostic process.

Aim: To optimize the process of ESD specimen sampling, embedding and slide production, and to provide complete and accurate pathological reports.

Methods: We established a practical process of specimen sampling, created standardized reporting templates, and trained pathologists from neighboring hospitals and those in the western region. A training effectiveness survey was conducted, and the collected data were assessed by the corresponding percentages.

Results: A total of 111 valid feedback forms have been received, among which 58% of the participants obtained photographs during specimen collection, whereas the percentage increased to 79% after training. Only 58% and 62% of the respondents ensured the mucosal tissue strips were flat and their order remained unchanged; after training, these two proportions increased to 95% and 92%, respectively. Approximately half the participants measured the depth of the submucosal infiltration, which significantly increased to 95% after training. The percentage of pathologists who did not evaluate lymphovascular invasion effectively reduced. Only 22% of the participants had fixed clinic-pathological meetings before training, which increased to 49% after training. The number of participants who had a thorough understanding of endoscopic diagnosis also significantly increased.

Conclusion: There have been significant improvements in the process of specimen collection, section quality, and pathology reporting in trained hospitals. Therefore, our study provides valuable insights for others facing similar challenges.

建立并推广内镜下粘膜夹层标本病理诊断标准模型。
背景:内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)是早期消化道癌的标准化治疗方法。在这方面,组织病理学诊断的过程需要标准化。然而,中国医疗保健发展的不平衡,特别是在中国东部和西部,为共享标准化诊断过程带来了挑战。目的:优化静电放电标本的采集、包埋和载玻片制作工艺,提供完整、准确的病理报告。方法:建立实用的标本采集流程,创建标准化的报告模板,并对周边医院和西部地区的病理学家进行培训。进行培训效果调查,并对收集到的数据进行相应的百分比评估。结果:共收到111份有效反馈表,其中58%的参与者在采集标本时获得了照片,培训后这一比例提高到79%。只有58%和62%的受访者确保粘膜组织条平整且顺序保持不变;训练后,这两个比例分别提高到95%和92%。大约一半的参与者测量了粘膜下浸润的深度,训练后显著增加到95%。病理学家没有有效评估淋巴血管侵犯的百分比降低了。只有22%的参与者在训练前有固定的临床病理会议,训练后增加到49%。深入了解内窥镜诊断的参与者人数也显著增加。结论:经过培训的医院在标本采集流程、切片质量和病理报告方面都有了明显的改进。因此,我们的研究为其他面临类似挑战的人提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信