Efficacy of methylene blue-assisted tract visualization in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a salvage technique for failed renal access.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Amir Hossein Hassani, Hooman Kamran, Abdolreza Haghpanah
{"title":"Efficacy of methylene blue-assisted tract visualization in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a salvage technique for failed renal access.","authors":"Amir Hossein Hassani, Hooman Kamran, Abdolreza Haghpanah","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01728-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We propose using methylene blue with ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (US-PCNL) as a salvage method when ultrasonography access is challenging, to prevent the necessity of creating a new tract or access failure. We retrospectively evaluated adult patients who underwent US-PCNL over two years by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups based on methylene blue usage. In cases with challenging renal access, diluted methylene blue was injected via the ureteral catheter, and the nephroscope was used to locate the parenchymal defect by visualizing the blue area. Among 120 patients, 34 (28.3%) required methylene blue for renal access. Recurrent stones (70.6% vs. 47.7%; p-value: 0.023) and previous PCNL (41.2% vs. 18.6%; p-value: 0.010) were more common in these patients. All achieved successful access with a single tract. Although access time (median: 235 vs. 160 s; p-value: < 0.001) and operative duration (median: 90 vs. 85 min; p-value: 0.023) were statistically longer when methylene blue was used, the differences were not clinically significant. Analgesic use, hospital stay, hemoglobin drop, and creatinine rise were similar between groups. Stone-free rates after the first session were 50.0% with methylene blue and 57.0% without it (p-value: 0.489). Residual stone rates requiring ancillary procedures were higher when methylene blue was needed (20.6% vs. 9.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p-value: 0.126). Complication rates were similar between the groups. Methylene blue injection into the ureteral catheter is a safe and effective procedure for US-PCNL, reducing access failure and the need for new tracts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01728-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose using methylene blue with ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (US-PCNL) as a salvage method when ultrasonography access is challenging, to prevent the necessity of creating a new tract or access failure. We retrospectively evaluated adult patients who underwent US-PCNL over two years by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups based on methylene blue usage. In cases with challenging renal access, diluted methylene blue was injected via the ureteral catheter, and the nephroscope was used to locate the parenchymal defect by visualizing the blue area. Among 120 patients, 34 (28.3%) required methylene blue for renal access. Recurrent stones (70.6% vs. 47.7%; p-value: 0.023) and previous PCNL (41.2% vs. 18.6%; p-value: 0.010) were more common in these patients. All achieved successful access with a single tract. Although access time (median: 235 vs. 160 s; p-value: < 0.001) and operative duration (median: 90 vs. 85 min; p-value: 0.023) were statistically longer when methylene blue was used, the differences were not clinically significant. Analgesic use, hospital stay, hemoglobin drop, and creatinine rise were similar between groups. Stone-free rates after the first session were 50.0% with methylene blue and 57.0% without it (p-value: 0.489). Residual stone rates requiring ancillary procedures were higher when methylene blue was needed (20.6% vs. 9.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p-value: 0.126). Complication rates were similar between the groups. Methylene blue injection into the ureteral catheter is a safe and effective procedure for US-PCNL, reducing access failure and the need for new tracts.

亚甲基蓝辅助肾道显像在超声引导下经皮肾镜取石术中的疗效:一种肾通道失败的抢救技术。
我们建议使用亚甲基蓝与超声引导下的经皮肾镜取石术(US-PCNL)作为一种抢救方法,当超声检查具有挑战性时,以防止创建新的通道或通道失败的必要性。我们回顾性地评估了由一名外科医生在两年内接受US-PCNL的成年患者。根据亚甲蓝的使用情况将患者分为两组。对于肾脏通路困难的病例,通过输尿管导管注射稀释亚甲基蓝,并通过可见蓝色区域使用肾镜定位实质缺损。在120例患者中,34例(28.3%)需要亚甲基蓝进行肾脏通路。复发性结石(70.6% vs. 47.7%;p值:0.023)和既往PCNL (41.2% vs. 18.6%;p值:0.010)在这些患者中更为常见。所有患者均通过单通道成功进入。虽然访问时间(中位数:235 vs. 160 s;假定值:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信