Jefferson Nascimento Dos Santos, Shamyr Sulyvan Castro, Juliana Arcanjo Lino, Camila Ferreira Leite
{"title":"Use of the biopsychosocial model of functioning in physiotherapeutic evaluation of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a survey-based study.","authors":"Jefferson Nascimento Dos Santos, Shamyr Sulyvan Castro, Juliana Arcanjo Lino, Camila Ferreira Leite","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03306-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to analyze the use of the biopsychosocial model of functioning in the physiotherapeutic evaluation of patients with obstructive sleep apnea in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Physiotherapists working with sleep-related breathing disorders were included. They completed an electronic questionnaire with items related to physiotherapeutic evaluations and sociodemographic characteristics. Data were reported in descriptive statistics, and the Wilcoxon test compared the codes of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) included in the evaluation and therapeutic objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample (n = 72) had a mean age of 41.4 ± 8.3 years, and most (n = 40) worked in the Southeast region. About 43.1% of the physiotherapists held sleep therapy certifications, 87.5% worked in clinical care, and most (62.5%) only with sleep disorders. Regarding the evaluation of sleep functions, 98.6% of the physiotherapists evaluated excessive sleepiness, and sleep quality was investigated using subjective questioning (80.3%). The components considered very relevant for evaluation were activity (73.6%), followed by body functions (72.2%), environmental factors (70.8%), body structure (65.3%), and participation (63.9%). Some components were evaluated but were not often included among the therapeutic objectives, such as recreational activity (p = 0.016) and intimate relationships (p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physiotherapists reported collecting information on all functioning components; most were activity and body function components. However, standardized evaluation tools for investigating functioning are not often applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 2","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03306-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Our study aimed to analyze the use of the biopsychosocial model of functioning in the physiotherapeutic evaluation of patients with obstructive sleep apnea in Brazil.
Methods: Physiotherapists working with sleep-related breathing disorders were included. They completed an electronic questionnaire with items related to physiotherapeutic evaluations and sociodemographic characteristics. Data were reported in descriptive statistics, and the Wilcoxon test compared the codes of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) included in the evaluation and therapeutic objectives.
Results: The sample (n = 72) had a mean age of 41.4 ± 8.3 years, and most (n = 40) worked in the Southeast region. About 43.1% of the physiotherapists held sleep therapy certifications, 87.5% worked in clinical care, and most (62.5%) only with sleep disorders. Regarding the evaluation of sleep functions, 98.6% of the physiotherapists evaluated excessive sleepiness, and sleep quality was investigated using subjective questioning (80.3%). The components considered very relevant for evaluation were activity (73.6%), followed by body functions (72.2%), environmental factors (70.8%), body structure (65.3%), and participation (63.9%). Some components were evaluated but were not often included among the therapeutic objectives, such as recreational activity (p = 0.016) and intimate relationships (p = 0.035).
Conclusions: Physiotherapists reported collecting information on all functioning components; most were activity and body function components. However, standardized evaluation tools for investigating functioning are not often applied.
期刊介绍：
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
