Andre Zugman, Grace V Ringlein, Emily S Finn, Krystal M Lewis, Erin Berman, Wendy K Silverman, Eli R Lebowitz, Daniel S Pine, Anderson M Winkler
{"title":"Brain functional connectivity and anatomical features as predictors of cognitive behavioral therapy outcome for anxiety in youths.","authors":"Andre Zugman, Grace V Ringlein, Emily S Finn, Krystal M Lewis, Erin Berman, Wendy K Silverman, Eli R Lebowitz, Daniel S Pine, Anderson M Winkler","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724003131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because pediatric anxiety disorders precede the onset of many other problems, successful prediction of response to the first-line treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), could have a major impact. This study evaluates whether structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging can predict post-CBT anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two datasets were studied: (A) one consisted of <i>n</i> = 54 subjects with an anxiety diagnosis, who received 12 weeks of CBT, and (B) one consisted of <i>n</i> = 15 subjects treated for 8 weeks. Connectome predictive modeling (CPM) was used to predict treatment response, as assessed with the PARS. The main analysis included network edges positively correlated with treatment outcome and age, sex, and baseline anxiety severity as predictors. Results from alternative models and analyses are also presented. Model assessments utilized 1000 bootstraps, resulting in a 95% CI for <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, <i>r</i>, and mean absolute error (MAE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main model showed a MAE of approximately 3.5 (95% CI: [3.1-3.8]) points, an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.08 [-0.14-0.26], and an <i>r</i> of 0.38 [0.24-0.511]. When testing this model in the left-out sample (B), the results were similar, with an MAE of 3.4 [2.8-4.7], <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>-0.65 [-2.29-0.16], and <i>r</i> of 0.4 [0.24-0.54]. The anatomical metrics showed a similar pattern, where models rendered overall low <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis showed that models based on earlier promising results failed to predict clinical outcomes. Despite the small sample size, this study does not support the extensive use of CPM to predict outcomes in pediatric anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e91"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724003131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Because pediatric anxiety disorders precede the onset of many other problems, successful prediction of response to the first-line treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), could have a major impact. This study evaluates whether structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging can predict post-CBT anxiety symptoms.
Methods: Two datasets were studied: (A) one consisted of n = 54 subjects with an anxiety diagnosis, who received 12 weeks of CBT, and (B) one consisted of n = 15 subjects treated for 8 weeks. Connectome predictive modeling (CPM) was used to predict treatment response, as assessed with the PARS. The main analysis included network edges positively correlated with treatment outcome and age, sex, and baseline anxiety severity as predictors. Results from alternative models and analyses are also presented. Model assessments utilized 1000 bootstraps, resulting in a 95% CI for R2, r, and mean absolute error (MAE).
Results: The main model showed a MAE of approximately 3.5 (95% CI: [3.1-3.8]) points, an R2 of 0.08 [-0.14-0.26], and an r of 0.38 [0.24-0.511]. When testing this model in the left-out sample (B), the results were similar, with an MAE of 3.4 [2.8-4.7], R2-0.65 [-2.29-0.16], and r of 0.4 [0.24-0.54]. The anatomical metrics showed a similar pattern, where models rendered overall low R2.
Conclusions: The analysis showed that models based on earlier promising results failed to predict clinical outcomes. Despite the small sample size, this study does not support the extensive use of CPM to predict outcomes in pediatric anxiety.
期刊介绍:
Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.