Contextual Adaptation of a Complex Intervention for the Management of Cancer Pain in Oncology Outpatient Services: A Case Study Example of Applying the ADAPT Guidelines.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Olivia C Robinson, Suzanne H Richards, Emily Shoesmith, Simon Pini, Marie Fallon, Matthew R Mulvey
{"title":"Contextual Adaptation of a Complex Intervention for the Management of Cancer Pain in Oncology Outpatient Services: A Case Study Example of Applying the ADAPT Guidelines.","authors":"Olivia C Robinson, Suzanne H Richards, Emily Shoesmith, Simon Pini, Marie Fallon, Matthew R Mulvey","doi":"10.1002/pon.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Standardising pain assessment in oncology outpatient services (OOS) leads to improvements in patients' pain and quality of life. The Edinburgh Pain Assessment Tool (EPAT) is a standardised cancer pain management tool that has been implemented on inpatient oncology wards (the original setting). Routine use of EPAT reduced post-surgical pain in cancer patients (the original scenario) and led to more appropriate analgesic prescribing. We describe here a case study of adapting the EPAT intervention for use in tertiary OOS in the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Services (NHS), using the ADAPT guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The adaptation process followed Moore et al.'s ADAPT guidance: Step 1: We assessed rationale for adapting EPAT by reviewing existing literature of pain management in OOS. Step 2: Semi-structured interviews with 20-healthcare professionals (HCPs) to understand current practice and how the intervention might fit the new context (OOS). Step 3: Identified the 'core' and 'peripheral' components of EPAT, undertook four co-design workshops with 7-HCPs to reconfigure EPAT to fit OOS (adapted version is referred to as EPAT+). Four HCPs trialled the EPAT+ intervention in practice to refine the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combining qualitative data from interviews with feedback from the co-design workshops and preliminary testing the prototype intervention highlighted several key adaptation goals for EPAT+. These included: (1) reduce length/time to complete EPAT+ due to time constraints in outpatient appointments, (2) the importance of pain re-assessment and using EPAT to facilitate patients to self-monitor their pain at home, and (3) the creation of new peripheral components to support communication with primary care providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a theoretical driven conceptual guidance provided important learning on how to adapt an existing cancer pain management tool to a new setting (OOS). The result is a novel complex theory- and evidence-based intervention that will be formally tested in a cluster randomised pilot trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 3","pages":"e70132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Standardising pain assessment in oncology outpatient services (OOS) leads to improvements in patients' pain and quality of life. The Edinburgh Pain Assessment Tool (EPAT) is a standardised cancer pain management tool that has been implemented on inpatient oncology wards (the original setting). Routine use of EPAT reduced post-surgical pain in cancer patients (the original scenario) and led to more appropriate analgesic prescribing. We describe here a case study of adapting the EPAT intervention for use in tertiary OOS in the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Services (NHS), using the ADAPT guidelines.

Methods: The adaptation process followed Moore et al.'s ADAPT guidance: Step 1: We assessed rationale for adapting EPAT by reviewing existing literature of pain management in OOS. Step 2: Semi-structured interviews with 20-healthcare professionals (HCPs) to understand current practice and how the intervention might fit the new context (OOS). Step 3: Identified the 'core' and 'peripheral' components of EPAT, undertook four co-design workshops with 7-HCPs to reconfigure EPAT to fit OOS (adapted version is referred to as EPAT+). Four HCPs trialled the EPAT+ intervention in practice to refine the intervention.

Results: Combining qualitative data from interviews with feedback from the co-design workshops and preliminary testing the prototype intervention highlighted several key adaptation goals for EPAT+. These included: (1) reduce length/time to complete EPAT+ due to time constraints in outpatient appointments, (2) the importance of pain re-assessment and using EPAT to facilitate patients to self-monitor their pain at home, and (3) the creation of new peripheral components to support communication with primary care providers.

Conclusions: Using a theoretical driven conceptual guidance provided important learning on how to adapt an existing cancer pain management tool to a new setting (OOS). The result is a novel complex theory- and evidence-based intervention that will be formally tested in a cluster randomised pilot trial.

目的:在肿瘤门诊服务(OOS)中实现疼痛评估标准化可改善患者的疼痛和生活质量。爱丁堡疼痛评估工具(EPAT)是一种标准化的癌症疼痛管理工具,已在肿瘤科住院病房(原始环境)实施。爱丁堡疼痛评估工具的常规使用减少了癌症患者手术后的疼痛(原始场景),并促成了更适当的镇痛处方。我们在此介绍一项案例研究,该研究利用 ADAPT 指南,将 EPAT 干预方法调整用于英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)的三级手术室:改编过程遵循 Moore 等人的 ADAPT 指南:第 1 步:通过回顾现有的 OOS 疼痛管理文献,评估改编 EPAT 的合理性。第 2 步:对 20 名医疗保健专业人员(HCP)进行半结构式访谈,以了解当前的实践以及干预措施如何适应新的环境(OOS)。第 3 步:确定 EPAT 的 "核心 "和 "外围 "部分,与 7 名保健专业人员开展四次共同设计研讨会,以重新配置 EPAT,使其适合 OOS(改编版本称为 EPAT+)。四名保健医生在实践中试用了 EPAT+ 干预方案,以完善该干预方案:将访谈中的定性数据与共同设计研讨会和干预原型初步测试中的反馈相结合,突出了 EPAT+ 的几个关键调整目标。这些目标包括(这些目标包括:(1)由于门诊预约的时间限制,缩短完成 EPAT+ 的长度/时间;(2)疼痛再评估的重要性,以及使用 EPAT 促进患者在家自我监测疼痛;(3)创建新的外围组件,支持与初级保健提供者的沟通:结论:使用理论驱动的概念指导为如何将现有的癌症疼痛管理工具应用于新的环境(OOS)提供了重要的借鉴。其结果是一种新颖的复杂理论和循证干预措施,将在群组随机试点试验中进行正式测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信