Assessment of Appearance-related Questions About Breast Reconstruction Generated by Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006625
Xiomara T Gonzalez, Margaret S Roubaud, Mark V Schaverien, Rene D Largo, Christopher S Parham, Ashleigh M Francis, Tzuan A Chen, Aubri S Hoffman, Ryan M Dickey, Mia K Markey, Gregory P Reece
{"title":"Assessment of Appearance-related Questions About Breast Reconstruction Generated by Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer.","authors":"Xiomara T Gonzalez, Margaret S Roubaud, Mark V Schaverien, Rene D Largo, Christopher S Parham, Ashleigh M Francis, Tzuan A Chen, Aubri S Hoffman, Ryan M Dickey, Mia K Markey, Gregory P Reece","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have explored the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on large language models, such as Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), to answer patient questions about breast reconstruction. In this study, we assessed the quality of questions generated by ChatGPT for breast reconstruction patients to ask their providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT was prompted to generate appearance-related questions representative of what patients might ask during breast reconstruction consultations. As a benchmark, a comparison group of questions from credible online sources was compiled. Blinded to the source, surgeons assessed the quality of questions in terms of their acceptability, contribution to the informed consent process, and contribution to the shared decision-making process. Surgeons were also asked to report their agreement on whether questions were generated by an AI tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experienced reconstructive surgeons rated ChatGPT-generated questions about appearance-related outcomes of breast reconstruction as acceptable (15 of 16), likely to positively contribute to the informed consent process (15 of 16), and likely to positively contribute to the shared decision-making process (16 of 16). These ratings were comparable to those for benchmark questions. Surgeons did not readily recognize questions as being AI-generated. Differences in surgeon assessments were most pronounced regarding the perceived potential for the questions to contribute to the informed consent process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of ChatGPT-generated questions related to appearance concerns is comparable to that of questions sourced from reputable online websites. Patients may benefit from discussion with their providers about best practices for using AI tools in preparation for consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 3","pages":"e6625"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have explored the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on large language models, such as Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), to answer patient questions about breast reconstruction. In this study, we assessed the quality of questions generated by ChatGPT for breast reconstruction patients to ask their providers.

Methods: ChatGPT was prompted to generate appearance-related questions representative of what patients might ask during breast reconstruction consultations. As a benchmark, a comparison group of questions from credible online sources was compiled. Blinded to the source, surgeons assessed the quality of questions in terms of their acceptability, contribution to the informed consent process, and contribution to the shared decision-making process. Surgeons were also asked to report their agreement on whether questions were generated by an AI tool.

Results: Experienced reconstructive surgeons rated ChatGPT-generated questions about appearance-related outcomes of breast reconstruction as acceptable (15 of 16), likely to positively contribute to the informed consent process (15 of 16), and likely to positively contribute to the shared decision-making process (16 of 16). These ratings were comparable to those for benchmark questions. Surgeons did not readily recognize questions as being AI-generated. Differences in surgeon assessments were most pronounced regarding the perceived potential for the questions to contribute to the informed consent process.

Conclusions: The quality of ChatGPT-generated questions related to appearance concerns is comparable to that of questions sourced from reputable online websites. Patients may benefit from discussion with their providers about best practices for using AI tools in preparation for consultations.

由聊天生成预训练转换器生成的乳房重建中外观相关问题的评估。
背景:之前的研究已经探索了基于大型语言模型的人工智能(AI)工具的能力,例如聊天生成预训练变压器(ChatGPT),以回答患者关于乳房重建的问题。在这项研究中,我们评估了ChatGPT为乳房重建患者向其提供者询问的问题的质量。方法:ChatGPT被提示生成与外观相关的问题,这些问题代表了患者在乳房重建咨询期间可能会提出的问题。作为基准,从可靠的在线资源中收集了一组比较问题。在对来源不知情的情况下,外科医生根据问题的可接受性、对知情同意过程的贡献以及对共同决策过程的贡献来评估问题的质量。外科医生还被要求报告他们是否同意问题是由人工智能工具产生的。结果:经验丰富的重建外科医生认为chatgpt生成的关于乳房重建外观相关结果的问题是可接受的(16分之15),可能对知情同意过程有积极的贡献(16分之15),可能对共同决策过程有积极的贡献(16分之16)。这些评分与基准问题的评分相当。外科医生并不容易识别出问题是由人工智能生成的。外科医生评估的差异最明显的是对问题有助于知情同意过程的感知潜力。结论:chatgpt生成的与外观相关的问题的质量与来自知名在线网站的问题相当。患者可能会从与医生讨论在会诊前使用人工智能工具的最佳做法中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信