Xiomara T Gonzalez, Margaret S Roubaud, Mark V Schaverien, Rene D Largo, Christopher S Parham, Ashleigh M Francis, Tzuan A Chen, Aubri S Hoffman, Ryan M Dickey, Mia K Markey, Gregory P Reece
{"title":"Assessment of Appearance-related Questions About Breast Reconstruction Generated by Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer.","authors":"Xiomara T Gonzalez, Margaret S Roubaud, Mark V Schaverien, Rene D Largo, Christopher S Parham, Ashleigh M Francis, Tzuan A Chen, Aubri S Hoffman, Ryan M Dickey, Mia K Markey, Gregory P Reece","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have explored the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on large language models, such as Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), to answer patient questions about breast reconstruction. In this study, we assessed the quality of questions generated by ChatGPT for breast reconstruction patients to ask their providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT was prompted to generate appearance-related questions representative of what patients might ask during breast reconstruction consultations. As a benchmark, a comparison group of questions from credible online sources was compiled. Blinded to the source, surgeons assessed the quality of questions in terms of their acceptability, contribution to the informed consent process, and contribution to the shared decision-making process. Surgeons were also asked to report their agreement on whether questions were generated by an AI tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experienced reconstructive surgeons rated ChatGPT-generated questions about appearance-related outcomes of breast reconstruction as acceptable (15 of 16), likely to positively contribute to the informed consent process (15 of 16), and likely to positively contribute to the shared decision-making process (16 of 16). These ratings were comparable to those for benchmark questions. Surgeons did not readily recognize questions as being AI-generated. Differences in surgeon assessments were most pronounced regarding the perceived potential for the questions to contribute to the informed consent process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of ChatGPT-generated questions related to appearance concerns is comparable to that of questions sourced from reputable online websites. Patients may benefit from discussion with their providers about best practices for using AI tools in preparation for consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 3","pages":"e6625"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have explored the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on large language models, such as Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), to answer patient questions about breast reconstruction. In this study, we assessed the quality of questions generated by ChatGPT for breast reconstruction patients to ask their providers.
Methods: ChatGPT was prompted to generate appearance-related questions representative of what patients might ask during breast reconstruction consultations. As a benchmark, a comparison group of questions from credible online sources was compiled. Blinded to the source, surgeons assessed the quality of questions in terms of their acceptability, contribution to the informed consent process, and contribution to the shared decision-making process. Surgeons were also asked to report their agreement on whether questions were generated by an AI tool.
Results: Experienced reconstructive surgeons rated ChatGPT-generated questions about appearance-related outcomes of breast reconstruction as acceptable (15 of 16), likely to positively contribute to the informed consent process (15 of 16), and likely to positively contribute to the shared decision-making process (16 of 16). These ratings were comparable to those for benchmark questions. Surgeons did not readily recognize questions as being AI-generated. Differences in surgeon assessments were most pronounced regarding the perceived potential for the questions to contribute to the informed consent process.
Conclusions: The quality of ChatGPT-generated questions related to appearance concerns is comparable to that of questions sourced from reputable online websites. Patients may benefit from discussion with their providers about best practices for using AI tools in preparation for consultations.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.