Screening Positive for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies Increases Frequency of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Alters Clinical Management.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1002/pd.6776
Devika Chawla, D Claire Miller, Summer Pierson, Lyuba Popadic, Francesca Devine, Dallas Reed, Katherine Johansen Taber
{"title":"Screening Positive for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies Increases Frequency of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Alters Clinical Management.","authors":"Devika Chawla, D Claire Miller, Summer Pierson, Lyuba Popadic, Francesca Devine, Dallas Reed, Katherine Johansen Taber","doi":"10.1002/pd.6776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Outcomes in pregnancies with rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) are poorly characterized, with most studies having small sample sizes. Here, we describe outcomes and management in a large cohort of pregnancies that screened positive for an RAA (RAA+).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results of prenatal cell-free DNA screening were linked to de-identified insurance claims data. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to estimate pregnancy outcomes and management. Relevant covariates in comparative analyses were adjusted using propensity-score matching. Outcomes were statistically compared using Mantel-Haenszel and McNemar's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 682 RAA+ pregnancies, the rate of live birth was significantly lower (56.7% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.001), and the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were significantly higher (14.8% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001; 18.5% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001; respectively), compared to pregnancies with RAA- results. In pregnancies that screened positive for a rare autosomal trisomy (RAT+) and in which the RAT+ results were known, ultrasounds (mean: 3.7 vs. 2.5, p = 0.002), and pregnancy-specific visits (mean: 6.6 vs. 5.1; p = 0.007) were more frequent compared with pregnancies in which the RAT+ result was unknown.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancies with RAA+ results had higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with those with RAA- results, and awareness of RAA+ results was associated with more intensive monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Outcomes in pregnancies with rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) are poorly characterized, with most studies having small sample sizes. Here, we describe outcomes and management in a large cohort of pregnancies that screened positive for an RAA (RAA+).

Methods: Results of prenatal cell-free DNA screening were linked to de-identified insurance claims data. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to estimate pregnancy outcomes and management. Relevant covariates in comparative analyses were adjusted using propensity-score matching. Outcomes were statistically compared using Mantel-Haenszel and McNemar's tests.

Results: Among 682 RAA+ pregnancies, the rate of live birth was significantly lower (56.7% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.001), and the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were significantly higher (14.8% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001; 18.5% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001; respectively), compared to pregnancies with RAA- results. In pregnancies that screened positive for a rare autosomal trisomy (RAT+) and in which the RAT+ results were known, ultrasounds (mean: 3.7 vs. 2.5, p = 0.002), and pregnancy-specific visits (mean: 6.6 vs. 5.1; p = 0.007) were more frequent compared with pregnancies in which the RAT+ result was unknown.

Conclusion: Pregnancies with RAA+ results had higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with those with RAA- results, and awareness of RAA+ results was associated with more intensive monitoring.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信