Eser Tüfekçi, Caroline K Carrico, Christina B Gordon, Steven J Lindauer
{"title":"How AI-Driven Root and Bone Predictions Can Assist Clear Aligner Treatment Planning.","authors":"Eser Tüfekçi, Caroline K Carrico, Christina B Gordon, Steven J Lindauer","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging has revolutionised dentistry by enhancing diagnostics and treatment planning. Advanced algorithms and machine-learning techniques may enable orthodontists to analyse complex cases and predict treatment outcomes accurately. This technology facilitates the creation of customised treatment plans that consider individual tooth morphology and periodontal health, optimising force application and minimising treatment time. Since their introduction, clear aligners have gained popularity, with over 17 million people treated by 2023. Compared with fixed appliances, clear aligners offer advantages, such as better aesthetics, comfort and oral hygiene. Treating patients with a compromised periodontium requires accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. This paper reviews how AI-driven treatment planning software predicting root movement and visualising bone structures may impact treatment decisions and, ultimately, treatment outcomes. The technology behind machine learning and AI in designing clear aligners is discussed. Research shows that when viewing the cases in 3D, clinicians are more comfortable when treating crowding cases with a non-extraction approach using interproximal reduction (IPR) only. However, it was interesting to note that clinicians with extensive experience treating clear aligner patients were more comfortable using IPR to address severe crowding cases when viewed in 2D, compared with those less experienced with clear aligners. However, when the cases were visualised in 3D, both groups showed equal comfort in using IPR, as the roots were within the bone. AI-driven treatment planning software, utilising machine learning in conjunction with 3D modelling, may enhance the predictability of orthodontic movements while reducing treatment time and increasing patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging has revolutionised dentistry by enhancing diagnostics and treatment planning. Advanced algorithms and machine-learning techniques may enable orthodontists to analyse complex cases and predict treatment outcomes accurately. This technology facilitates the creation of customised treatment plans that consider individual tooth morphology and periodontal health, optimising force application and minimising treatment time. Since their introduction, clear aligners have gained popularity, with over 17 million people treated by 2023. Compared with fixed appliances, clear aligners offer advantages, such as better aesthetics, comfort and oral hygiene. Treating patients with a compromised periodontium requires accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. This paper reviews how AI-driven treatment planning software predicting root movement and visualising bone structures may impact treatment decisions and, ultimately, treatment outcomes. The technology behind machine learning and AI in designing clear aligners is discussed. Research shows that when viewing the cases in 3D, clinicians are more comfortable when treating crowding cases with a non-extraction approach using interproximal reduction (IPR) only. However, it was interesting to note that clinicians with extensive experience treating clear aligner patients were more comfortable using IPR to address severe crowding cases when viewed in 2D, compared with those less experienced with clear aligners. However, when the cases were visualised in 3D, both groups showed equal comfort in using IPR, as the roots were within the bone. AI-driven treatment planning software, utilising machine learning in conjunction with 3D modelling, may enhance the predictability of orthodontic movements while reducing treatment time and increasing patient satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.