Minocycline and Omadacycline Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Molecular Characterization.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Richa Sinha, Jyoti Jyoti, Ashutosh Pathak, Chinmoy Sahu, Prabhaker Mishra, Rungmei S K Marak, Ujjala Ghoshal
{"title":"Minocycline and Omadacycline Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Molecular Characterization.","authors":"Richa Sinha, Jyoti Jyoti, Ashutosh Pathak, Chinmoy Sahu, Prabhaker Mishra, Rungmei S K Marak, Ujjala Ghoshal","doi":"10.1089/mdr.2024.0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant infections has rendered the healthcare systems ineffective in managing infectious diseases. Drugs of \"last resort\" like carbapenems and polymyxins are becoming less effective in the management of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, leaving the clinicians with limited choices. Evaluation of the efficacy of other available broad-spectrum antibiotics (belonging to a different class) is warranted as a treatment alternative. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the <i>in vitro</i> antibacterial activity of minocycline and a new drug, omadacycline among carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), isolated from clinical samples (pus and sputum) and to genotypically analyze them. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a 3,200-bedded tertiary care medical center, located in Lucknow in the northern part of India. All the clinical isolates recovered from pus and sputum samples of patients admitted in intensive care units were processed according to the standard protocols. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed, and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) showing resistance to minocycline were included in the study. Molecular screening of β-lactamase and tetracycline resistance genes was done by the conventional polymerase chain reaction method. Minimum inhibitory concentration analysis was performed using the broth microdilution technique. Among 700 CRGNB, 15.29% (<i>n</i> = 107/700) were minocycline resistant by disk diffusion method. Genetic analysis demonstrated the presence of tetracycline-resistant genes in about one-third isolates, among which the <i>tet</i>(B) gene was present in 41.12% (<i>n</i> = 44/107). Upon broth microdilution analysis, the overall minimum inhibitory concentration for minocycline was raised, wherein 4.76% (<i>n</i> = 5/107) of our clinical Gram-negative isolates were inhibited at ≤8 mg/L and 15.23% (<i>n</i> = 28/107) were inhibited at ≤16 mg/L. Omadacycline was able to inhibit 13.08% (<i>n</i> = 14/107) of the minocycline-resistant isolates at ≤4 mg/L (susceptible breakpoint for <i>Enterobacterales</i>). Based on the cut-off value proposed, 15.09% (<i>n</i> = 16/107) isolates resistant to minocycline were inhibited by omadacycline. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant bugs entails judicious use of minocycline and omadacycline. The presence of <i>tet</i> genes coexisting with <i>bla</i><sub>NDM</sub> and <i>bla</i><sub>OXA</sub> in our bacterial isolates shows that the resistance pattern in Gram-negative bacilli is regularly evolving, and a fully functional surveillance program across the health care system is needed to prevent the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18701,"journal":{"name":"Microbial drug resistance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial drug resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2024.0215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant infections has rendered the healthcare systems ineffective in managing infectious diseases. Drugs of "last resort" like carbapenems and polymyxins are becoming less effective in the management of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, leaving the clinicians with limited choices. Evaluation of the efficacy of other available broad-spectrum antibiotics (belonging to a different class) is warranted as a treatment alternative. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of minocycline and a new drug, omadacycline among carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), isolated from clinical samples (pus and sputum) and to genotypically analyze them. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a 3,200-bedded tertiary care medical center, located in Lucknow in the northern part of India. All the clinical isolates recovered from pus and sputum samples of patients admitted in intensive care units were processed according to the standard protocols. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed, and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) showing resistance to minocycline were included in the study. Molecular screening of β-lactamase and tetracycline resistance genes was done by the conventional polymerase chain reaction method. Minimum inhibitory concentration analysis was performed using the broth microdilution technique. Among 700 CRGNB, 15.29% (n = 107/700) were minocycline resistant by disk diffusion method. Genetic analysis demonstrated the presence of tetracycline-resistant genes in about one-third isolates, among which the tet(B) gene was present in 41.12% (n = 44/107). Upon broth microdilution analysis, the overall minimum inhibitory concentration for minocycline was raised, wherein 4.76% (n = 5/107) of our clinical Gram-negative isolates were inhibited at ≤8 mg/L and 15.23% (n = 28/107) were inhibited at ≤16 mg/L. Omadacycline was able to inhibit 13.08% (n = 14/107) of the minocycline-resistant isolates at ≤4 mg/L (susceptible breakpoint for Enterobacterales). Based on the cut-off value proposed, 15.09% (n = 16/107) isolates resistant to minocycline were inhibited by omadacycline. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant bugs entails judicious use of minocycline and omadacycline. The presence of tet genes coexisting with blaNDM and blaOXA in our bacterial isolates shows that the resistance pattern in Gram-negative bacilli is regularly evolving, and a fully functional surveillance program across the health care system is needed to prevent the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance.

耐碳青霉烯革兰氏阴性菌对米诺环素和奥马达环素的耐药性:药敏试验和分子表征。
耐多药感染的日益流行使卫生保健系统在管理传染病方面效率低下。碳青霉烯类和多粘菌素等“最后手段”药物在治疗耐药革兰氏阴性细菌感染方面的效果越来越差,这使得临床医生的选择有限。评估其他可用的广谱抗生素(属于不同类别)作为治疗替代方案的有效性是有必要的。本研究旨在评价米诺环素和一种新药奥马达环素对临床标本(脓液和痰液)中碳青霉烯耐药革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)的体外抗菌活性,并对其进行基因型分析。一项前瞻性横断面研究在位于印度北部勒克瑙的一个拥有3200个床位的三级保健医疗中心进行。从重症监护病房住院患者的脓和痰样本中分离得到的临床分离株均按标准方案处理。进行鉴定和药敏试验,纳入对米诺环素有耐药性的碳青霉烯耐药革兰氏阴性菌(CRGNB)。采用常规聚合酶链式反应法筛选β-内酰胺酶和四环素耐药基因。最小抑菌浓度分析采用肉汤微量稀释技术。圆盘扩散法检测的700株CRGNB中,15.29% (n = 107/700)对米诺环素耐药。遗传分析显示,约1 / 3的菌株存在四环素耐药基因,其中tet(B)基因占41.12% (n = 44/107)。通过肉汤微量稀释分析,提高了对米诺环素的总体最小抑制浓度,其中4.76% (n = 5/107)的临床革兰氏阴性菌株在≤8 mg/L时被抑制,15.23% (n = 28/107)的临床革兰氏阴性菌株在≤16 mg/L时被抑制。奥马达环素在≤4 mg/L(肠杆菌敏感断点)时对米诺环素耐药菌株的抑制率为13.08% (n = 14/107)。根据截断值,15.09% (n = 16/107)耐米诺环素菌株被奥马达环素抑制。多药耐药细菌的高流行率需要明智地使用米诺环素和奥马达环素。我们分离的细菌中存在tet基因与blaNDM和blaOXA共存,这表明革兰氏阴性杆菌的耐药模式是有规律地演变的,需要在整个卫生保健系统中建立一个功能齐全的监测计划,以防止抗菌素耐药性的出现和传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial drug resistance
Microbial drug resistance 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbial Drug Resistance (MDR) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers the global spread and threat of multi-drug resistant clones of major pathogens that are widely documented in hospitals and the scientific community. The Journal addresses the serious challenges of trying to decipher the molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. MDR provides a multidisciplinary forum for peer-reviewed original publications as well as topical reviews and special reports. MDR coverage includes: Molecular biology of resistance mechanisms Virulence genes and disease Molecular epidemiology Drug design Infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信