Assessment of central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in myopes using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity.

Q3 Medicine
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ojo.ojo_271_23
Parul Ichhpujani, Uday Pratap Singh Parmar, Rohan Bir Singh, Suresh Kumar
{"title":"Assessment of central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in myopes using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity.","authors":"Parul Ichhpujani, Uday Pratap Singh Parmar, Rohan Bir Singh, Suresh Kumar","doi":"10.4103/ojo.ojo_271_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing central and peripheral contrast sensitivity (CS) in myopic patients with varying degrees of refractive error using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS) and compared it with emmetropic individuals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CS of 50 consecutive myopic individuals of varying severity was matched with emmetropes using an online CS test, SPARCS, and Pelli-Robson test. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when comparing the groups. A <i>post hoc</i> analysis was also done to compare pairs of each group. SPARCS scores were correlated with age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 126 eyes, 96 eyes from 50 myopes and 30 eyes from 15 emmetropes, were analyzed. The total SPARCS scores of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 75.15 ± 9.59, 76.48 ± 7.74, 74.55 ± 7.48, and 86.43 + 5.3, respectively. Univariate ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in total SPARCS score distribution in the three subgroups with myopia (<i>P</i> = 0.048) and between all the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.000). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups when comparing the individual SPARCS scores with either age or gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that there is a significant difference in the CS in patients with varying severity of myopia and assessing peripheral CS is an important adjunct to central CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19461,"journal":{"name":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"18 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_271_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessing central and peripheral contrast sensitivity (CS) in myopic patients with varying degrees of refractive error using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS) and compared it with emmetropic individuals.

Materials and methods: CS of 50 consecutive myopic individuals of varying severity was matched with emmetropes using an online CS test, SPARCS, and Pelli-Robson test. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when comparing the groups. A post hoc analysis was also done to compare pairs of each group. SPARCS scores were correlated with age and gender.

Results: Data of 126 eyes, 96 eyes from 50 myopes and 30 eyes from 15 emmetropes, were analyzed. The total SPARCS scores of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 75.15 ± 9.59, 76.48 ± 7.74, 74.55 ± 7.48, and 86.43 + 5.3, respectively. Univariate ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in total SPARCS score distribution in the three subgroups with myopia (P = 0.048) and between all the groups (P = 0.000). No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups when comparing the individual SPARCS scores with either age or gender.

Conclusion: The study concludes that there is a significant difference in the CS in patients with varying severity of myopia and assessing peripheral CS is an important adjunct to central CS.

使用Spaeth/Richman对比敏感度评估近视的中央和外周对比敏感度。
背景:应用speth /Richman对比敏感度试验(SPARCS)评估不同程度屈光不正近视患者的中枢和外周对比敏感度(CS),并与屈光不正个体进行比较。材料与方法:采用在线CS测试、SPARCS测试和Pelli-Robson测试对50例不同严重程度的连续近视患者的CS与emmetropes进行匹配。连续分布数据的组间比较在组间比较时采用方差分析(ANOVA)。还进行了事后分析以比较各组的配对。SPARCS评分与年龄、性别相关。结果:对126只眼的资料进行分析,其中近视50只96只眼,近视眼15只30只眼。1、2、3、4组患者SPARCS总分分别为75.15±9.59、76.48±7.74、74.55±7.48、86.43 + 5.3。单因素方差分析显示,3个近视亚组的SPARCS总分分布差异有统计学意义(P = 0.048),组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。当比较个体SPARCS评分与年龄或性别时,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:不同程度近视患者的CS存在显著差异,评估周围CS是中心CS的重要辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a platform for scientific expression of the Oman Ophthalmic Society and the international Ophthalmic community and to provide opportunities for free exchange of ideas and information. To serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists, eye-care providers including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信