Kamonwon Ienghong, Sukanya Khemtong, Lap Woon Cheung, Korakot Apiratwarakul
{"title":"Enhanced Diagnostic Precision in Revisited Emergency Patients via Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Tool for Emergency Department Quality Management.","authors":"Kamonwon Ienghong, Sukanya Khemtong, Lap Woon Cheung, Korakot Apiratwarakul","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S507075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department (ED) were categorized into physician-related, illness-related, and patient-related factors, which are associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including patient dissatisfaction, infections, hospitalization, transfer to another facility, and mortality. Individuals within 48-72 hours of the initial visit are deemed at elevated risk for diagnostic or management-related errors. The Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may serve as a bedside tool to reduce medical errors by enhancing diagnostic precision. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for detecting various illnesses in revisited patients in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on unplanned revisits by patients to the emergency department within 72 hours, spanning the period from January 2023 to September 2024. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were evaluated based on electronic emergency department medical records and ultrasound documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred seventy patients were included in this study. POCUS demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 75.61% (95% CI 71.87, 79.09), a sensitivity of 81.87% (95% CI 77.65, 85.58), a specificity of 62.50% (95% CI 55.08, 69.51), a positive likelihood ratio of 2.18 (95% CI 1.80, 2.65), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.29 (95% CI 0.23, 0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy, which may enhance diagnostic precision in revisited patients with various illnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"1549-1556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S507075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department (ED) were categorized into physician-related, illness-related, and patient-related factors, which are associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including patient dissatisfaction, infections, hospitalization, transfer to another facility, and mortality. Individuals within 48-72 hours of the initial visit are deemed at elevated risk for diagnostic or management-related errors. The Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may serve as a bedside tool to reduce medical errors by enhancing diagnostic precision. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for detecting various illnesses in revisited patients in the emergency department.
Patients and methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on unplanned revisits by patients to the emergency department within 72 hours, spanning the period from January 2023 to September 2024. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were evaluated based on electronic emergency department medical records and ultrasound documentation.
Results: Five hundred seventy patients were included in this study. POCUS demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 75.61% (95% CI 71.87, 79.09), a sensitivity of 81.87% (95% CI 77.65, 85.58), a specificity of 62.50% (95% CI 55.08, 69.51), a positive likelihood ratio of 2.18 (95% CI 1.80, 2.65), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.29 (95% CI 0.23, 0.37).
Conclusion: POCUS demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy, which may enhance diagnostic precision in revisited patients with various illnesses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.