Enhanced Diagnostic Precision in Revisited Emergency Patients via Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Tool for Emergency Department Quality Management.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S507075
Kamonwon Ienghong, Sukanya Khemtong, Lap Woon Cheung, Korakot Apiratwarakul
{"title":"Enhanced Diagnostic Precision in Revisited Emergency Patients via Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Tool for Emergency Department Quality Management.","authors":"Kamonwon Ienghong, Sukanya Khemtong, Lap Woon Cheung, Korakot Apiratwarakul","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S507075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department (ED) were categorized into physician-related, illness-related, and patient-related factors, which are associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including patient dissatisfaction, infections, hospitalization, transfer to another facility, and mortality. Individuals within 48-72 hours of the initial visit are deemed at elevated risk for diagnostic or management-related errors. The Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may serve as a bedside tool to reduce medical errors by enhancing diagnostic precision. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for detecting various illnesses in revisited patients in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on unplanned revisits by patients to the emergency department within 72 hours, spanning the period from January 2023 to September 2024. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were evaluated based on electronic emergency department medical records and ultrasound documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred seventy patients were included in this study. POCUS demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 75.61% (95% CI 71.87, 79.09), a sensitivity of 81.87% (95% CI 77.65, 85.58), a specificity of 62.50% (95% CI 55.08, 69.51), a positive likelihood ratio of 2.18 (95% CI 1.80, 2.65), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.29 (95% CI 0.23, 0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy, which may enhance diagnostic precision in revisited patients with various illnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"1549-1556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S507075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department (ED) were categorized into physician-related, illness-related, and patient-related factors, which are associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including patient dissatisfaction, infections, hospitalization, transfer to another facility, and mortality. Individuals within 48-72 hours of the initial visit are deemed at elevated risk for diagnostic or management-related errors. The Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may serve as a bedside tool to reduce medical errors by enhancing diagnostic precision. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for detecting various illnesses in revisited patients in the emergency department.

Patients and methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on unplanned revisits by patients to the emergency department within 72 hours, spanning the period from January 2023 to September 2024. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were evaluated based on electronic emergency department medical records and ultrasound documentation.

Results: Five hundred seventy patients were included in this study. POCUS demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 75.61% (95% CI 71.87, 79.09), a sensitivity of 81.87% (95% CI 77.65, 85.58), a specificity of 62.50% (95% CI 55.08, 69.51), a positive likelihood ratio of 2.18 (95% CI 1.80, 2.65), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.29 (95% CI 0.23, 0.37).

Conclusion: POCUS demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy, which may enhance diagnostic precision in revisited patients with various illnesses.

通过护理点超声波提高急诊重症患者的诊断精确度:急诊科质量管理工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信