Kamonwon Ienghong, Sukanya Khemtong, Lap Woon Cheung, Korakot Apiratwarakul
{"title":"Enhanced Diagnostic Precision in Revisited Emergency Patients via Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Tool for Emergency Department Quality Management.","authors":"Kamonwon Ienghong, Sukanya Khemtong, Lap Woon Cheung, Korakot Apiratwarakul","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S507075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department (ED) were categorized into physician-related, illness-related, and patient-related factors, which are associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including patient dissatisfaction, infections, hospitalization, transfer to another facility, and mortality. Individuals within 48-72 hours of the initial visit are deemed at elevated risk for diagnostic or management-related errors. The Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may serve as a bedside tool to reduce medical errors by enhancing diagnostic precision. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for detecting various illnesses in revisited patients in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on unplanned revisits by patients to the emergency department within 72 hours, spanning the period from January 2023 to September 2024. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were evaluated based on electronic emergency department medical records and ultrasound documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred seventy patients were included in this study. POCUS demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 75.61% (95% CI 71.87, 79.09), a sensitivity of 81.87% (95% CI 77.65, 85.58), a specificity of 62.50% (95% CI 55.08, 69.51), a positive likelihood ratio of 2.18 (95% CI 1.80, 2.65), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.29 (95% CI 0.23, 0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy, which may enhance diagnostic precision in revisited patients with various illnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"1549-1556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S507075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department (ED) were categorized into physician-related, illness-related, and patient-related factors, which are associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including patient dissatisfaction, infections, hospitalization, transfer to another facility, and mortality. Individuals within 48-72 hours of the initial visit are deemed at elevated risk for diagnostic or management-related errors. The Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may serve as a bedside tool to reduce medical errors by enhancing diagnostic precision. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for detecting various illnesses in revisited patients in the emergency department.
Patients and methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on unplanned revisits by patients to the emergency department within 72 hours, spanning the period from January 2023 to September 2024. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were evaluated based on electronic emergency department medical records and ultrasound documentation.
Results: Five hundred seventy patients were included in this study. POCUS demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 75.61% (95% CI 71.87, 79.09), a sensitivity of 81.87% (95% CI 77.65, 85.58), a specificity of 62.50% (95% CI 55.08, 69.51), a positive likelihood ratio of 2.18 (95% CI 1.80, 2.65), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.29 (95% CI 0.23, 0.37).
Conclusion: POCUS demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy, which may enhance diagnostic precision in revisited patients with various illnesses.
目的:将急诊(ED)的非计划回访分为与医生相关、与疾病相关和与患者相关的因素,这些因素与不良健康结果的风险增加相关,包括患者不满、感染、住院、转移到其他机构和死亡率。初次就诊后48-72小时内的个体被认为有较高的诊断或管理相关错误风险。即时超声(POCUS)可作为床边工具,通过提高诊断精度来减少医疗差错。本研究旨在探讨POCUS对急诊科复诊患者各种疾病的诊断准确性。患者和方法:对2023年1月至2024年9月期间急诊患者在72小时内的计划外复诊进行回顾性观察研究。敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比基于电子急诊科病历和超声文件进行评估。结果:570例患者纳入本研究。POCUS的诊断准确率为75.61% (95% CI 71.87, 79.09),敏感性为81.87% (95% CI 77.65, 85.58),特异性为62.50% (95% CI 55.08, 69.51),阳性似然比为2.18 (95% CI 1.80, 2.65),阴性似然比为0.29 (95% CI 0.23, 0.37)。结论:POCUS具有较高的诊断准确性,可提高各种疾病复诊的诊断精度。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.