Application Effectiveness of a Pre-Analytical Quality Management Pathway Based on the Structure-Process-Outcome Model.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S486258
Liping Cui, Wanling Li, Yueqin Li, Xiaofang Feng, Yue Wang, Pei Gao
{"title":"Application Effectiveness of a Pre-Analytical Quality Management Pathway Based on the Structure-Process-Outcome Model.","authors":"Liping Cui, Wanling Li, Yueqin Li, Xiaofang Feng, Yue Wang, Pei Gao","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S486258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This single-center, before-and-after study applied the structure-process-outcome (SPO) model to pre-analytical quality control to investigate its effect on laboratory testing quality, nursing practices, patient satisfaction, and clinician trust in test results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A before-and-after design was conducted in a provincial Class A tertiary hospital. The control group (April-September 2022) and observation group (April-September 2023) each included all laboratory specimens and 550 clinical nurses (from the same wards). The SPO-guided pre-analytical quality management pathway involved forming a multidisciplinary team, establishing a grid management system, implementing a non-punitive reporting system, standardizing specimen collection, and developing a quality management information system. Groups were compared on non-compliant test sample rates, nurses' knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors, operational standardization, patient satisfaction, and clinical doctors' trust. Data were analyzed using t-tests (with effect sizes) and <i>χ²</i>-tests; confidence intervals and multiple-comparison corrections were also applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group showed significantly lower rates of non-compliance in sample type, collection container, volume, contaminated blood cultures, and coagulated samples (all p < 0.01, with 95% confidence intervals). Nurses' knowledge (Cohen's d = 0.44) and behaviors (Cohen's d = 1.56) improved significantly. Operational standardization (92.5 ± 3.2 vs 85.7 ± 4.1), patient satisfaction (93.8% vs 87.2%), and clinical doctors' trust (91.2% vs 84.5%) also increased significantly (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SPO-based pre-analytical quality management pathway significantly improved non-compliant sample rates, nurses' knowledge and behavior, operational standardization, patient satisfaction, and clinical trust in test results. This approach may serve as a reference for other institutions aiming to enhance pre-analytical quality management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"1571-1579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S486258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This single-center, before-and-after study applied the structure-process-outcome (SPO) model to pre-analytical quality control to investigate its effect on laboratory testing quality, nursing practices, patient satisfaction, and clinician trust in test results.

Methods: A before-and-after design was conducted in a provincial Class A tertiary hospital. The control group (April-September 2022) and observation group (April-September 2023) each included all laboratory specimens and 550 clinical nurses (from the same wards). The SPO-guided pre-analytical quality management pathway involved forming a multidisciplinary team, establishing a grid management system, implementing a non-punitive reporting system, standardizing specimen collection, and developing a quality management information system. Groups were compared on non-compliant test sample rates, nurses' knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors, operational standardization, patient satisfaction, and clinical doctors' trust. Data were analyzed using t-tests (with effect sizes) and χ²-tests; confidence intervals and multiple-comparison corrections were also applied.

Results: The observation group showed significantly lower rates of non-compliance in sample type, collection container, volume, contaminated blood cultures, and coagulated samples (all p < 0.01, with 95% confidence intervals). Nurses' knowledge (Cohen's d = 0.44) and behaviors (Cohen's d = 1.56) improved significantly. Operational standardization (92.5 ± 3.2 vs 85.7 ± 4.1), patient satisfaction (93.8% vs 87.2%), and clinical doctors' trust (91.2% vs 84.5%) also increased significantly (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The SPO-based pre-analytical quality management pathway significantly improved non-compliant sample rates, nurses' knowledge and behavior, operational standardization, patient satisfaction, and clinical trust in test results. This approach may serve as a reference for other institutions aiming to enhance pre-analytical quality management.

基于结构-过程-结果模型的分析前质量管理途径的应用效果。
目的:本研究采用结构-过程-结果(SPO)模型进行分析前质量控制,探讨分析前质量控制对实验室检测质量、护理实践、患者满意度和临床医生对检测结果的信任的影响。方法:在某省级三甲医院进行前后设计。对照组(2022年4月- 9月)和观察组(2023年4月- 9月)包括所有实验室标本和550名临床护士(来自同一病房)。spo指导的分析前质量管理路径包括组建多学科团队、建立网格化管理体系、实施非惩罚性报告制度、规范标本采集、建立质量管理信息系统。比较各组不符合检测样本率、护士知识、信念和行为、操作规范化、患者满意度和临床医生信任度。数据分析采用t检验(带效应量)和χ 2检验;置信区间和多重比较校正也被应用。结果:观察组在标本种类、采集容器、体积、污染血培养物、凝固标本不合规率均显著低于对照组(p < 0.01,有95%可信区间)。护士的知识(Cohen’s d = 0.44)和行为(Cohen’s d = 1.56)均有显著改善。操作规范化(92.5±3.2比85.7±4.1)、患者满意度(93.8%比87.2%)、临床医生信任度(91.2%比84.5%)也显著提高(p < 0.01)。结论:基于spo的分析前质量管理路径显著提高了不合规样本率、护士知识和行为、操作规范化、患者满意度和临床对检测结果的信任度。该方法可为其他旨在加强分析前质量管理的机构提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信