Considerations When Accounting for Race and Ethnicity in Studies of Poverty and Neurodevelopment.

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Clementine Semanaz, Akhgar Ghassabian, Scott Delaney, Fang Fang, David R Williams, Henning Tiemeier
{"title":"Considerations When Accounting for Race and Ethnicity in Studies of Poverty and Neurodevelopment.","authors":"Clementine Semanaz, Akhgar Ghassabian, Scott Delaney, Fang Fang, David R Williams, Henning Tiemeier","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poverty and systemic racism are intertwined. Children of marginalized racial and ethnic identities experience higher levels of poverty and adverse psychiatric outcomes. Thus, in models of poverty and neurodevelopment, race and ethnicity, as proxies for exposure to systemic disadvantage, are regularly considered confounders. Recently, however, some researchers have claimed that using race and ethnicity as confounders is statistically dubious, and potentially socially damaging. Instead, they argue for the use of variables measuring other social determinants of health (SDoH). We explore this approach herein.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data are from 7,836 children 10 years of age in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study). We fit mixed regression models for the association of household poverty measures with psychiatric symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived cortical measures, and cognition with and without (1) race and ethnicity adjustment, (2) poverty-by-race and ethnicity interaction terms, and (3) alternative SDoH variables. Propensity-based weights were used to calibrate the sample to key US demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For psychiatric and cognitive outcomes, poverty-outcome relationships differed across racial and ethnic groups (interaction of poverty by race and ethnicity, p < .05). For MRI-derived outcomes, adjusting for race and ethnicity changed the estimate of the impact of poverty. Alternative SDoH adjustment could not fully account for the impact of race and ethnicity on the associations explored.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poverty and both race and ethnicity combine to influence neurodevelopment. Results suggest that the effects of poverty are generally inconsistent across race and ethnicity, which supports prior research demonstrating the nonequivalence of SDoH indicators by race and ethnicity. Studies exploring these relationships should assess the interaction between poverty and race and ethnicity and/or should stratify when appropriate. Replacing race and ethnicity with alternative SDoH may induce bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.03.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Poverty and systemic racism are intertwined. Children of marginalized racial and ethnic identities experience higher levels of poverty and adverse psychiatric outcomes. Thus, in models of poverty and neurodevelopment, race and ethnicity, as proxies for exposure to systemic disadvantage, are regularly considered confounders. Recently, however, some researchers have claimed that using race and ethnicity as confounders is statistically dubious, and potentially socially damaging. Instead, they argue for the use of variables measuring other social determinants of health (SDoH). We explore this approach herein.

Method: Data are from 7,836 children 10 years of age in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study). We fit mixed regression models for the association of household poverty measures with psychiatric symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived cortical measures, and cognition with and without (1) race and ethnicity adjustment, (2) poverty-by-race and ethnicity interaction terms, and (3) alternative SDoH variables. Propensity-based weights were used to calibrate the sample to key US demographics.

Results: For psychiatric and cognitive outcomes, poverty-outcome relationships differed across racial and ethnic groups (interaction of poverty by race and ethnicity, p < .05). For MRI-derived outcomes, adjusting for race and ethnicity changed the estimate of the impact of poverty. Alternative SDoH adjustment could not fully account for the impact of race and ethnicity on the associations explored.

Conclusion: Poverty and both race and ethnicity combine to influence neurodevelopment. Results suggest that the effects of poverty are generally inconsistent across race and ethnicity, which supports prior research demonstrating the nonequivalence of SDoH indicators by race and ethnicity. Studies exploring these relationships should assess the interaction between poverty and race and ethnicity and/or should stratify when appropriate. Replacing race and ethnicity with alternative SDoH may induce bias.

在贫困和神经发育研究中考虑种族和民族因素时的考虑。
目的:贫困与体制内罕见的种族主义交织在一起。被边缘化的种族和民族身份的儿童经历了更高程度的贫困和不良的精神后果。因此,在贫困和神经发育的模型中,种族和民族——作为暴露于系统性劣势的代理——通常被认为是混杂因素。然而,最近一些研究人员声称,使用种族和民族作为混杂因素在统计上是可疑的,并且可能对社会造成损害。相反,他们主张使用变量来衡量健康的其他社会决定因素(SDoH)。我们探索这种方法。方法:数据来自7836名参加青少年大脑和认知发展研究的10岁儿童。我们拟合混合回归模型,将家庭贫困指标与精神症状、磁共振成像(MRI)皮质指标以及有或没有(1)种族和民族调整的认知指标相关联;(2);种族和民族贫困相互作用项和(3)替代SDoH变量。使用基于倾向的权重来校准样本以符合美国关键人口统计数据。结果:在精神病学和认知结果方面,不同种族和民族群体的贫困-结局关系不同(种族-民族贫困相互作用)。结论:贫困和种族-民族共同影响神经发育。结果表明,贫困的影响在种族和民族之间普遍不一致,这支持了先前的研究,即种族和民族之间的SDoH指标不相等。探索这些关系的研究应评估贫穷与种族和民族之间的相互作用,并/或酌情分层。用替代的SDoH代替种族和民族可能会引起偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信