Postpartum remote blood pressure monitoring and risk of hypertensive-related readmission: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fabrizio Zullo, Daniele Di Mascio, Farah H Amro, Sara Sorrenti, Elena D'Alberti, Antonella Giancotti, Giuseppe Rizzo, Suneet P Chauhan
{"title":"Postpartum remote blood pressure monitoring and risk of hypertensive-related readmission: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Fabrizio Zullo, Daniele Di Mascio, Farah H Amro, Sara Sorrenti, Elena D'Alberti, Antonella Giancotti, Giuseppe Rizzo, Suneet P Chauhan","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy of remote blood pressure monitoring to prevent readmission due to complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web-of-Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID and Cochrane-Library as electronic databases from the inception of each database to November 2023. Selection criteria included randomized controlled trials of postpartum individuals randomized to remote blood pressure monitoring or telehealth strategies vs. routine-care. The primary outcome was postpartum readmission, defined as postpartum hospital admission after discharge. Secondary maternal outcomes included stroke, eclampsia, ICU-admission, maternal death, emergency department visit, ascertainment of a blood pressure measurement within 7-10 days after delivery, attendance of the 4-6-week postpartum visit. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) or as mean difference (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs including 714 individuals randomized to either telematic reporting of blood pressure measurements (n=356, 49.8 %) or standard postpartum care (n=358, 50.1 %). There were no significant differences in the rate of hospital readmission due to hypertensive related causes (5.3 % vs. 11.8 %). However, emergency department visit rate differed significantly among the two groups (9.0 % vs. 4.4 %). With regards to postpartum follow up, blood pressure assessment at 10 days postpartum and 4-6-week postpartum visit attendance rate were similar. No included RCT provided data on maternal secondary outcome like pulmonary edema, stroke, maternal death, and ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote blood pressure monitoring is not superior to standard care to prevent hypertensive related readmission and increases emergency department visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of remote blood pressure monitoring to prevent readmission due to complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Methods: The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web-of-Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID and Cochrane-Library as electronic databases from the inception of each database to November 2023. Selection criteria included randomized controlled trials of postpartum individuals randomized to remote blood pressure monitoring or telehealth strategies vs. routine-care. The primary outcome was postpartum readmission, defined as postpartum hospital admission after discharge. Secondary maternal outcomes included stroke, eclampsia, ICU-admission, maternal death, emergency department visit, ascertainment of a blood pressure measurement within 7-10 days after delivery, attendance of the 4-6-week postpartum visit. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) or as mean difference (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Four RCTs including 714 individuals randomized to either telematic reporting of blood pressure measurements (n=356, 49.8 %) or standard postpartum care (n=358, 50.1 %). There were no significant differences in the rate of hospital readmission due to hypertensive related causes (5.3 % vs. 11.8 %). However, emergency department visit rate differed significantly among the two groups (9.0 % vs. 4.4 %). With regards to postpartum follow up, blood pressure assessment at 10 days postpartum and 4-6-week postpartum visit attendance rate were similar. No included RCT provided data on maternal secondary outcome like pulmonary edema, stroke, maternal death, and ICU admission.

Conclusions: Remote blood pressure monitoring is not superior to standard care to prevent hypertensive related readmission and increases emergency department visits.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信